WotB Message Board
- Typical Redmond effort then... (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 11, 21:15:24
- One reason he should play on the right (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Feb 11, 21:16:13
- Lucky it wasnt Ricky that missed that (NCFC) - Under soil heating, Feb 11, 21:11:51
- hoopers scored a few tho (n/m) (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Feb 11, 21:14:01
- yep. should get off Ricky's back, no one can finish (n/m) (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Feb 11, 21:13:43
- Are you pants? (n/m) (NCFC) - Dandy Highburyman, Feb 11, 21:13:41
- Just what I thought (n/m) (NCFC) - earlydoors, Feb 11, 21:14:42
- Rikayyyyyy. Would love him to bust the back of the net. (n/m) (NCFC) - ghost of hucks, Feb 11, 21:13:35
- ? He has been shit so far. What do you expect. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 11, 21:12:32
- How do keepers have outstanding game against us? (n/m) (NCFC) - bullsch, Feb 11, 21:11:31
- because we dont shoot either side of where the keeper is (n/m) (NCFC) - robotbear, Feb 11, 21:14:44
- a poor finish... (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 11, 21:12:54
- We make it easy for them (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Feb 11, 21:12:29
- What a chance for Hooper!! (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 11, 21:11:21
- It's a pretty shit game now, isn't it? (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Feb 11, 21:08:51
- scrapissimo (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Man, Feb 11, 21:10:31
- yep. (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Feb 11, 21:10:04
- awful 2nd half. Still having the better of it. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 11, 21:09:48
- We look toothless up front.... But better than West Ham's attack (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 11, 21:05:29
- Harsh Yellow there (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 11, 21:02:01
- stooped yellow really - too slow (n/m) (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Feb 11, 21:02:45
- Yes it was, considering what's gone unpunished before (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Man, Feb 11, 21:02:24
- Chelski 1-0 Baggies. Good. Keep it up. (n/m) (Other Football) - Old Man, Feb 11, 20:50:19
- great stuff (n/m) (Other Football) - phrankin, Feb 11, 20:53:19
- Lucky Carlton Cole was rolling around on the floor instead of playing then (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 11, 20:25:23
- Johnson Johnson FFS SHOOT! (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 11, 20:07:41
- Oh, Snod Snod Snod. How can you not score there? (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Man, Feb 11, 20:03:10
- Pilkington would have scored that, don't get Snods (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Feb 11, 20:05:55
- I wonder if Pilks would have put that away? (n/m) (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Feb 11, 20:05:51
- easier to score then! (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 11, 20:03:33
- should be 1 up (n/m) (NCFC) - loveshack, Feb 11, 20:04:58
- Fer will be the key (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 11, 19:42:14
- gets dragged too deep... or indeed is ordered to play too deep (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 11, 19:49:58
- I'm sure normal for norway will have an opinion on this. (n/m) (NCFC) - South stand corner, Feb 11, 19:48:48
- Deano Ashton's is talking about us on Talkysports right now. (n/m) (NCFC) - I Am Hoot, Feb 11, 08:51:36
- I don't like him (NCFC) - Darren Eadie, Feb 11, 09:54:26
- Really? Don't recall that... I've never had much time for Sutton for the same reason (n/m) (NCFC) - Adster, Feb 11, 10:06:24
- I was told at the time (and I have no reason to disbelieve it) (NCFC) - Darren Eadie, Feb 11, 10:13:17
- Oof. Probably happens reasonably often unfortunately (n/m) (NCFC) - Adster, Feb 11, 10:17:08
- Player wants to move to a bigger club to better themselves.... (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 11, 10:41:36
- That's not the point (NCFC) - Darren Eadie, Feb 11, 11:15:33
- I support the striking tube workers, I'd find it harder to support striking (NCFC) - Adster, Feb 11, 10:50:21
- Player wants to move to a bigger club to better themselves.... (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 11, 10:41:36
- Oof. Probably happens reasonably often unfortunately (n/m) (NCFC) - Adster, Feb 11, 10:17:08
- I was told at the time (and I have no reason to disbelieve it) (NCFC) - Darren Eadie, Feb 11, 10:13:17
- Really? Don't recall that... I've never had much time for Sutton for the same reason (n/m) (NCFC) - Adster, Feb 11, 10:06:24
- He reckons West Hammers are going to do a win, (NCFC) - I Am Hoot, Feb 11, 09:00:11
- People who rave over Ashton never saw Sutton, Fleck or Reeves (NCFC) - Hulk Rules, Feb 11, 09:27:42
- I saw them all and for my money (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 11, 10:13:32
- Agree 100% (n/m) (NCFC) - Adster, Feb 11, 10:17:59
- Sutton scored 28 Premier League ghouls (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 11, 09:53:34
- his brother used to tell me that Chris was a better cricketer than footballer, (NCFC) - I Am Hoot, Feb 11, 11:58:15
- a few more than that, IIRC (n/m) (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 11, 11:37:58
- In one season (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 11, 12:32:19
- nope. Not that either. (n/m) (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 11, 14:31:48
- In one season (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 11, 12:32:19
- ...decent for a centre half! (n/m) (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Feb 11, 09:55:39
- He was no Gary Doherty (n/m) (NCFC) - Adster, Feb 11, 10:00:12
- Well, you will (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Feb 11, 09:43:17
- Haha! Agreed. Flecky was marvellous (n/m) (NCFC) - I Am Hoot, Feb 11, 09:31:49
- I saw them all and for my money (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 11, 10:13:32
- not really a traitor, played for them too (NCFC) - robotbear, Feb 11, 09:19:26
- Obviously.. (n/m) (NCFC) - I Am Hoot, Feb 11, 09:25:23
- he's doing a Dubbs reverse psychology - he loves us! (n/m) (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Feb 11, 09:05:14
- or... (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Feb 11, 09:07:23
- tonight we will blow that stat out of the water - 0.4 to the Nodge (n/m) (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Feb 11, 09:14:41
- wow! (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Feb 11, 09:47:33
- now you're just being ridikerlus! (n/m) (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Feb 11, 11:11:35
- wow! (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Feb 11, 09:47:33
- tonight we will blow that stat out of the water - 0.4 to the Nodge (n/m) (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Feb 11, 09:14:41
- or... (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Feb 11, 09:07:23
- he's not wrong tho, about us not scoring goals....and he should know, (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Feb 11, 09:03:54
- People who rave over Ashton never saw Sutton, Fleck or Reeves (NCFC) - Hulk Rules, Feb 11, 09:27:42
- I don't like him (NCFC) - Darren Eadie, Feb 11, 09:54:26
- "If he is not suspended the message is clear - you can do what you want," said Mourinho. (NCFC) - Lager top, Feb 10, 17:29:53
- good decision for us (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 10, 17:49:42
- a late late soup entry: Clam chowder (General Chat) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 10, 17:25:02
- Big soup..that is all (n/m) (General Chat) - Mickdundee, Feb 10, 17:52:32
- Asparagus. All the way, man. (General Chat) - APB, Feb 10, 17:38:02
- french onion with cheesy crutons, crusty white bread and a large glass of red (n/m) (General Chat) - Hendrikos, Feb 10, 17:40:29
- tres bonne (n/m) (General Chat) - Jumbo1, Feb 10, 17:41:13
- Yep, very good choice (n/m) (General Chat) - phrankin, Feb 10, 18:11:12
- tres bonne (n/m) (General Chat) - Jumbo1, Feb 10, 17:41:13
- Asparagus, Pretty Boring (n/m) (General Chat) - Jumbo1, Feb 10, 17:39:14
- I like ut. Good solid choice (n/m) (General Chat) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 10, 17:41:01
- whoosh (General Chat) - Jumbo1, Feb 10, 17:42:52
- ha, missed that. And I was just thinking yesterday that no one does that anymore (n/m) (General Chat) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 10, 17:44:36
- x (n/m) (General Chat) - Jumbo1, Feb 10, 17:56:43
- appropriate and pleasing bantz (n/m) (General Chat) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 10, 17:57:56
- AAPB (n/m) (General Chat) - Jumbo1, Feb 10, 19:30:24
- na, you never include 'and' in an acronym innit (n/m) (General Chat) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 10, 19:42:09
- AAPB (n/m) (General Chat) - Jumbo1, Feb 10, 19:30:24
- appropriate and pleasing bantz (n/m) (General Chat) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 10, 17:57:56
- x (n/m) (General Chat) - Jumbo1, Feb 10, 17:56:43
- ha, missed that. And I was just thinking yesterday that no one does that anymore (n/m) (General Chat) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 10, 17:44:36
- whoosh (General Chat) - Jumbo1, Feb 10, 17:42:52
- I like ut. Good solid choice (n/m) (General Chat) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 10, 17:41:01
- french onion with cheesy crutons, crusty white bread and a large glass of red (n/m) (General Chat) - Hendrikos, Feb 10, 17:40:29
- West ham have lost every game they have gone behind in this season..... (NCFC) - Kirrie, Feb 10, 15:35:43
- Palace had that record (NCFC) - Duck, Feb 10, 15:38:46
- I'd take a 0-0 (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 10, 15:36:58
- Is there some ralationship between you and Hoot we should know about..... (NCFC) - Kirrie, Feb 10, 16:11:35
- LOL (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 10, 15:48:40
- ^ ffs! and here lays the root of most of our problems! (n/m) (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Feb 10, 15:45:06
- the root of our problems is that I wouldn't be disappointed with a draw tomorrow? (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 10, 15:45:44
- maybe not, but wouldnt you rather an exciting 3-3 with an RvW hat-trick (cough!) than (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Feb 10, 15:49:03
- 3-0 down, 15 to go, RvW comes on (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 10, 15:50:22
- Loz will be after you for that (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 10, 16:02:20
- I was asked to "show some respect" when I suggested he was a lemon a few weeks back.... (n/m) (NCFC) - Pit, Feb 10, 16:05:06
- loz gets very angry (NCFC) - norway, Feb 10, 16:22:56
- Agree. He continously offers us a "Mecagoenti" defence of RvWs failings. (n/m) (NCFC) - Pit, Feb 10, 16:25:20
- And when he finally scores we'll all have to apologise (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 10, 16:32:02
- At the point loz would offer up the "Everton goal" scenario to the jury. (n/m) (NCFC) - Pit, Feb 10, 16:34:06
- Yes but that was 6 months ago (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 10, 16:37:10
- At the point loz would offer up the "Everton goal" scenario to the jury. (n/m) (NCFC) - Pit, Feb 10, 16:34:06
- This will one day be known as a legal saying (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 10, 16:29:54
- I prefer to see it as an opening chess gambit (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 10, 16:33:21
- I see it as a dogmatic self-belief in one's opinions. (n/m) (NCFC) - Pit, Feb 10, 16:35:30
- that would be unique on the wrath (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 10, 16:36:38
- Oh God yes. You're the most un-fickle poster on here. ;-) (n/m) (NCFC) - Pit, Feb 10, 16:49:01
- that would be unique on the wrath (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 10, 16:36:38
- I see it as a dogmatic self-belief in one's opinions. (n/m) (NCFC) - Pit, Feb 10, 16:35:30
- I prefer to see it as an opening chess gambit (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 10, 16:33:21
- And when he finally scores we'll all have to apologise (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 10, 16:32:02
- Agree. He continously offers us a "Mecagoenti" defence of RvWs failings. (n/m) (NCFC) - Pit, Feb 10, 16:25:20
- Not sure how we respect his lack of goals and air kicks (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 10, 16:08:21
- Agree. He may come good yet. But not this season. (n/m) (NCFC) - Pit, Feb 10, 16:10:26
- loz gets very angry (NCFC) - norway, Feb 10, 16:22:56
- I was asked to "show some respect" when I suggested he was a lemon a few weeks back.... (n/m) (NCFC) - Pit, Feb 10, 16:05:06
- lol! (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Feb 10, 15:51:29
- Loz will be after you for that (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 10, 16:02:20
- of course I would prefer that (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 10, 15:49:59
- it does if our hapless dutch striker comes on and misses a fucking sitter. (n/m) (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Feb 10, 15:50:57
- so predicatble that it went through his legs in the 90th min on the goal line. (NCFC) - Pit, Feb 10, 16:04:05
- don't think RvW will come on if it's 0-0 late on (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 10, 15:54:16
- "brilliant!" - how many more seasons of this shit do we have to endure? (n/m) (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Feb 10, 15:58:06
- tbf, Whittaker could be seen as a more potent attacking option than RvW (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 10, 15:58:52
- so could mark bunn tbf. (n/m) (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Feb 10, 16:00:12
- lol (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 10, 16:53:30
- so could mark bunn tbf. (n/m) (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Feb 10, 16:00:12
- tbf, Whittaker could be seen as a more potent attacking option than RvW (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 10, 15:58:52
- "brilliant!" - how many more seasons of this shit do we have to endure? (n/m) (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Feb 10, 15:58:06
- it does if our hapless dutch striker comes on and misses a fucking sitter. (n/m) (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Feb 10, 15:50:57
- 3-0 down, 15 to go, RvW comes on (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 10, 15:50:22
- maybe not, but wouldnt you rather an exciting 3-3 with an RvW hat-trick (cough!) than (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Feb 10, 15:49:03
- the root of our problems is that I wouldn't be disappointed with a draw tomorrow? (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 10, 15:45:44
- That's the problems 0-0's won't be enough, cos we won't get enough of them! (n/m) (NCFC) - Kirrie, Feb 10, 15:39:44
- we'll be lucky to get "nil" again! (n/m) (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Feb 10, 15:45:32
- I think it probably will (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 10, 15:43:02
- Norway'll have you for breach of copyright! (n/m) (NCFC) - Kirrie, Feb 10, 16:12:51
- Hr should just bask in the glory of sharing my view (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 10, 16:15:28
- I'm merely basking in the glory of your need to copy me to make your point. (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Feb 10, 16:22:02
- Yep like the Beatles plagiarizing your music (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 10, 16:39:12
- I think you're more Oasis to my Beatles to be fair. (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Feb 10, 16:39:54
- That odd nor. I had you down as a Milli Vanilli. (n/m) (NCFC) - Pit, Feb 10, 16:50:37
- lol (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 10, 16:45:13
- I think you're more Oasis to my Beatles to be fair. (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Feb 10, 16:39:54
- Yep like the Beatles plagiarizing your music (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 10, 16:39:12
- I'm merely basking in the glory of your need to copy me to make your point. (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Feb 10, 16:22:02
- Hr should just bask in the glory of sharing my view (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 10, 16:15:28
- You're welcome (NCFC) - norway, Feb 10, 15:51:16
- Norway'll have you for breach of copyright! (n/m) (NCFC) - Kirrie, Feb 10, 16:12:51
- I agree, but I think in this one game it would be a decent result (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 10, 15:41:20
- You are Chris Hughton, and I claim my ?5 (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Feb 10, 15:37:37
- I've backed 0-0, with a small saver wager on only 1 goal in total. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Feb 10, 15:46:32
- how did we end up with the most boring manager since Howard Wilkinson (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 10, 15:39:16
- Latest final table prediction (NCFC) - norway, Feb 10, 13:38:00
- I told you you were too negative about West Ham last week (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Feb 10, 13:51:42
- WBA have replaced us with Cardiff and Fulham for me (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 10, 13:49:11
- Sunderland are going down as well (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 10, 13:55:24
- Sunderland's next three Premier League fixtures: (NCFC) - norway, Feb 10, 14:00:23
- And then a fuckload of winnable home games (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 10, 14:09:47
- exactly - their race is run (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 10, 14:03:31
- Yeah they might as well give up (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 10, 14:16:30
- They will probably go into the Palace game on the back of (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 10, 14:18:49
- They've beaten Chelsea, Man City and Man United this season (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 10, 14:36:48
- correct (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 10, 14:38:43
- So they're not rubbish and are not "gone"? (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 10, 14:46:18
- they're not rubbish - or at least haven't been recently or in the cup (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 10, 14:48:23
- "Too much to do"... (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 10, 14:56:59
- I just think they will go down (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 10, 15:00:34
- It's your reasons why that are weird (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 10, 15:04:42
- not really - my reasons are that what look like relatively easy home games on paper (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 10, 15:09:02
- lucky they have only lost 2 in the last god knows how many (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 10, 15:14:16
- their home form hasn't been very good (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 10, 15:15:57
- Their home form may be poor (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 10, 15:18:00
- I've just told you the teams they played against (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 10, 15:19:57
- They beat Stoke; drew with Norwich (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 10, 15:23:26
- yes, so five points from five winnable home games (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 10, 15:24:30
- They will be fine if they keep picking up points as they have been (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 10, 15:27:45
- the point is they won't pick up points as they have been doing (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 10, 15:29:46
- You are right, 3 very tough games, then the easiest run-in out of everyone (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 10, 15:33:36
- the point is they won't pick up points as they have been doing (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 10, 15:29:46
- Of course you don't. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 10, 15:26:18
- They will be fine if they keep picking up points as they have been (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 10, 15:27:45
- yes, so five points from five winnable home games (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 10, 15:24:30
- They beat Stoke; drew with Norwich (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 10, 15:23:26
- I've just told you the teams they played against (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 10, 15:19:57
- Their home form may be poor (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 10, 15:18:00
- their home form hasn't been very good (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 10, 15:15:57
- You're assuming other teams pick up (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 10, 15:13:51
- Sunderland don't have an easier run in though (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 10, 15:19:18
- All at home so yeah they do (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 10, 15:20:54
- incorrect (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 10, 15:22:50
- Swansea are level on points in 10th (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 10, 15:26:01
- Sunderland have scored once in five games at home to bottom half sides (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 10, 15:28:28
- In that case why the fuck aren't they bottom 3? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 10, 15:32:29
- they've done well against the better teams at home (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 10, 15:35:06
- Oh you mean like us last season! (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 10, 15:38:30
- similar to us yes - but because of their awful start (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 10, 15:40:37
- We had a bad start and finished ELEVENTH (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 10, 15:48:23
- similar to us yes - but because of their awful start (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 10, 15:40:37
- Oh you mean like us last season! (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 10, 15:38:30
- they've done well against the better teams at home (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 10, 15:35:06
- There scoring has improved of late (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 10, 15:31:35
- In that case why the fuck aren't they bottom 3? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 10, 15:32:29
- Sunderland have scored once in five games at home to bottom half sides (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 10, 15:28:28
- Swansea are level on points in 10th (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 10, 15:26:01
- incorrect (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 10, 15:22:50
- All at home so yeah they do (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 10, 15:20:54
- Cardiff and Fulham look in real trouble.... (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 10, 15:16:35
- Sunderland don't have an easier run in though (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 10, 15:19:18
- lucky they have only lost 2 in the last god knows how many (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 10, 15:14:16
- not really - my reasons are that what look like relatively easy home games on paper (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 10, 15:09:02
- They might (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 10, 15:04:05
- It's your reasons why that are weird (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 10, 15:04:42
- I just think they will go down (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 10, 15:00:34
- "Too much to do"... (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 10, 14:56:59
- they're not rubbish - or at least haven't been recently or in the cup (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 10, 14:48:23
- So they're not rubbish and are not "gone"? (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 10, 14:46:18
- correct (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 10, 14:38:43
- Freak (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 10, 14:26:18
- They may well go down (NCFC) - norway, Feb 10, 14:20:46
- Of course I'm exaggerating a bit (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 10, 14:23:39
- Well that's true, yes. (NCFC) - norway, Feb 10, 14:26:13
- Exactly he seems to think everyone else will just hit form (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 10, 14:29:01
- we'll see - I think unless they can scrape a result in one of their next three they (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 10, 14:33:00
- Yeah the dire early momentum really destroyed them (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 10, 14:48:52
- agreed - looks like that will ultimately send them down (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 10, 14:54:13
- Yeah the dire early momentum really destroyed them (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 10, 14:48:52
- we'll see - I think unless they can scrape a result in one of their next three they (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 10, 14:33:00
- Exactly he seems to think everyone else will just hit form (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 10, 14:29:01
- Well that's true, yes. (NCFC) - norway, Feb 10, 14:26:13
- Of course I'm exaggerating a bit (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 10, 14:23:39
- They've beaten Chelsea, Man City and Man United this season (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 10, 14:36:48
- They will probably go into the Palace game on the back of (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 10, 14:18:49
- Yeah they might as well give up (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 10, 14:16:30
- Sunderland's next three Premier League fixtures: (NCFC) - norway, Feb 10, 14:00:23
- Sunderland are going down as well (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 10, 13:55:24
- people who moan about fans with nicknames for other clubs, ie 'phallace', 'vile' etc (General Chat) - Cheltenham_Canary, Feb 10, 13:13:04
- Bell (n/m) (General Chat) - MIKEWALKER, Feb 10, 13:28:25
- "Striiiiiiiiiiiiiike" - hook, line and sinker. Reeeesult (n/m) (General Chat) - CB41, Feb 10, 13:25:45
- We're the morecambe and wise of trolling bastards (n/m) (General Chat) - SCC 28, Feb 10, 13:31:38
- Get in! - speaking of documentaries, you been watching the Paxman WW1 series? (n/m) (General Chat) - CB41, Feb 10, 13:37:30
- Yes but annoyed I missed the first episode (General Chat) - SCC 28, Feb 10, 13:46:38
- "sense of humour"..... (n/m) (General Chat) - Only1Doherty, Feb 10, 14:01:23
- wrong place sorry (n/m) (General Chat) - Only1Doherty, Feb 10, 14:01:42
- "sense of humour"..... (n/m) (General Chat) - Only1Doherty, Feb 10, 14:01:23
- Yes but annoyed I missed the first episode (General Chat) - SCC 28, Feb 10, 13:46:38
- Get in! - speaking of documentaries, you been watching the Paxman WW1 series? (n/m) (General Chat) - CB41, Feb 10, 13:37:30
- We're the morecambe and wise of trolling bastards (n/m) (General Chat) - SCC 28, Feb 10, 13:31:38
- Oh, they're meant to be 'funny'? I see... (n/m) (General Chat) - Yellalee, Feb 10, 13:14:47
- Isn't just the wrath thing to do? (General Chat) - strap_on sally, Feb 10, 13:22:52
- I like 'em (n/m) (General Chat) - phrankin, Feb 10, 13:16:58
- When I heard that England women's captain felt she had to announce her sexuality (General Chat) - norway, Feb 10, 13:20:16
- New post fail. (n/m) (General Chat) - norway, Feb 10, 13:20:42
- Nicely contexts this thread though (n/m) (General Chat) - Yellalee, Feb 10, 13:24:39
- Is Chelts a lesbian then? (n/m) (General Chat) - CB41, Feb 10, 13:26:26
- He Looks like one (n/m) (General Chat) - phrankin, Feb 10, 13:29:12
- Agreed - and his favourite drink is Baileys (n/m) (General Chat) - CB41, Feb 10, 13:29:55
- i'd LOVE to be a lesbian. I'd be a BLOODY good one too! (n/m) (General Chat) - Cheltenham_Canary, Feb 10, 15:47:43
- you'd be the ugly butch one in dungarees and DM's (General Chat) - Jumbo1, Feb 10, 16:13:32
- great!!!! (General Chat) - Cheltenham_Canary, Feb 10, 16:17:52
- yep - that would be me! (n/m) (General Chat) - Jumbo1, Feb 10, 16:22:21
- great!!!! (General Chat) - Cheltenham_Canary, Feb 10, 16:17:52
- you'd be the ugly butch one in dungarees and DM's (General Chat) - Jumbo1, Feb 10, 16:13:32
- i'd LOVE to be a lesbian. I'd be a BLOODY good one too! (n/m) (General Chat) - Cheltenham_Canary, Feb 10, 15:47:43
- Agreed - and his favourite drink is Baileys (n/m) (General Chat) - CB41, Feb 10, 13:29:55
- He Looks like one (n/m) (General Chat) - phrankin, Feb 10, 13:29:12
- Is Chelts a lesbian then? (n/m) (General Chat) - CB41, Feb 10, 13:26:26
- Nicely contexts this thread though (n/m) (General Chat) - Yellalee, Feb 10, 13:24:39
- New post fail. (n/m) (General Chat) - norway, Feb 10, 13:20:42
- When I heard that England women's captain felt she had to announce her sexuality (General Chat) - norway, Feb 10, 13:20:16
- Do we need to be more bold to stay in the Prem and if so, can we be more bold - discuss?? (n/m) (NCFC) - Kirrie, Feb 10, 12:32:41
- Wish I was as confident that we can keep all these clean sheets! (n/m) (NCFC) - Kirrie, Feb 10, 13:30:25
- Stoke have proven you can be tedious and stay up (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 10, 12:45:41
- Didn't Arsenal used to be very, very tedious? I seem to remeber them (NCFC) - CB41, Feb 10, 12:48:21
- The George Graham years - very successful in the main (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 10, 12:52:37
- Well yes but at the expense of tedium (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Feb 10, 12:53:28
- That's not right is it. I think I mean at the expense of excitement (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Feb 10, 12:54:11
- Well yes but at the expense of tedium (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Feb 10, 12:53:28
- The George Graham years - very successful in the main (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 10, 12:52:37
- Didn't Arsenal used to be very, very tedious? I seem to remeber them (NCFC) - CB41, Feb 10, 12:48:21
- 1-0 wins against West Brom and Stoke (NCFC) - norway, Feb 10, 12:38:40
- Nope we can be boring and stay up (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 10, 12:35:41
- ... (NCFC) - Nelsons final flanel, Feb 10, 12:35:12
- One thing Saturday must have done is put an end to this 4-4-2 bollox. (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Feb 10, 10:50:49
- Why (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Feb 10, 11:53:39
- You'd hope so... (NCFC) - munchen, Feb 10, 11:17:31
- well it was 4411, but don't let that get in the way of the truth, one eye. (n/m) (NCFC) - protheroe fitzgibbon, Feb 10, 11:43:00
- I'd have to disagree when Elmander plays yes its more 4-4-1-1 just..but (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Feb 10, 11:51:04
- it was deffo 4-5-1 against Man City, with Redmond the out ball (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 10, 12:49:51
- I'd have to disagree when Elmander plays yes its more 4-4-1-1 just..but (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Feb 10, 11:51:04
- well it was 4411, but don't let that get in the way of the truth, one eye. (n/m) (NCFC) - protheroe fitzgibbon, Feb 10, 11:43:00
- Perhaps being a little unfair, but you do the get the sense Hoots *hates* not playing Snod (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Feb 10, 08:13:57
- not unfair, he has played snod every game when fit regardless of form. (n/m) (NCFC) - fal5taff, Feb 10, 08:25:15
- I hope he starts with the same line up on Tuesday (n/m) (NCFC) - BSE Canary, Feb 10, 08:16:54
- You know Snoddy will be back in the XI as soon as he's fit. (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Feb 10, 08:29:53
- He's a decent footballer, but really slows down our attacks to a snails pace (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 10, 08:52:34
- Wonder if he could play behind the main striker in a Wes type role (n/m) (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Feb 10, 08:55:14
- We really should try him there (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Man, Feb 10, 09:18:22
- Has played there in pre season games (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 10, 09:19:20
- Oh, OK. Didn't he do well there for Scotland? (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Man, Feb 10, 09:22:19
- Played up front for Scotland as an out and out striker (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 10, 09:24:31
- Ah. No. Just no. (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Man, Feb 10, 09:40:25
- Played up front for Scotland as an out and out striker (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 10, 09:24:31
- Oh, OK. Didn't he do well there for Scotland? (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Man, Feb 10, 09:22:19
- Has played there in pre season games (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 10, 09:19:20
- We really should try him there (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Man, Feb 10, 09:18:22
- Wonder if he could play behind the main striker in a Wes type role (n/m) (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Feb 10, 08:55:14
- He's a decent footballer, but really slows down our attacks to a snails pace (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 10, 08:52:34
- You know Snoddy will be back in the XI as soon as he's fit. (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Feb 10, 08:29:53
- I hope he starts with the same line up on Tuesday (n/m) (NCFC) - BSE Canary, Feb 10, 08:16:32
- Yes, me too. (n/m) (NCFC) - bird table, Feb 10, 09:39:52
- +1 (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Man, Feb 10, 09:18:36
- Anyone have the stats for most fouls committed? (n/m) (NCFC) - Hootenanny, Feb 9, 18:55:15
- Mick Phelan and Carragher said that stats are often useless (NCFC) - Huge Small, Feb 9, 19:40:01
- Oops! Hit the enter button too sonn, meant to add (NCFC) - Hootenanny, Feb 9, 18:56:57
- He does get angry quite easily. (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Feb 9, 18:58:19
- worst in the premiership after his 7 starts early in the season (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 9, 19:36:44
- interesting stat... Leroy Fer committed the 2nd most fouls in the Premiership this term (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 9, 19:37:55
- worst in the premiership after his 7 starts early in the season (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 9, 19:36:44
- He does get angry quite easily. (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Feb 9, 18:58:19
- Since records began? (n/m) (NCFC) - Upperjarroldmiddle, Feb 9, 18:55:51
- Fulham presumably scored in time added on for their own timewasting (n/m) (Other Football) - mr carra, Feb 9, 17:57:52
- New rules needed (Other Football) - Kar1, Feb 9, 18:21:51
- Time wasting should be added on no matter what. (Other Football) - phrankin, Feb 9, 18:41:53
- New rules needed (Other Football) - Kar1, Feb 9, 18:21:51
- In the car Man U 0 Fulham 1 ..... Switch on the laptop 2-1 Fantastic! (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 9, 17:42:52
- FAO Yeller Lee (NCFC) - mike_the_sphinx, Feb 9, 08:15:55
- A 9 game unbeaten run... Wow (n/m) (NCFC) - Drinklebells, Feb 9, 08:27:26
- 10 games last season. We're due something decent. (n/m) (NCFC) - mike_the_sphinx, Feb 9, 09:08:32
- 1 win in 12 games right now (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 9, 09:18:57
- 10 games last season. We're due something decent. (n/m) (NCFC) - mike_the_sphinx, Feb 9, 09:08:32
- A 9 game unbeaten run... Wow (n/m) (NCFC) - Drinklebells, Feb 9, 08:27:26
- No cheating. What is our home goal difference? (n/m) (NCFC) - Hendrikos, Feb 8, 21:17:31
- 9 (n/m) (NCFC) - Bristol Graham, Feb 8, 21:42:01
- 0? (n/m) (NCFC) - bird table, Feb 8, 21:28:37
- Yes. Only 11 goals conceded at home all season! We are massive!!! (n/m) (NCFC) - Hendrikos, Feb 8, 21:39:32
- ^^ cheated (n/m) (NCFC) - Klobo04, Feb 8, 21:29:56
- Oi! I know nuffin stats wise. (n/m) (NCFC) - bird table, Feb 8, 21:44:37
- 9 (n/m) (NCFC) - Graham Nine, Feb 8, 21:27:17
- 9 (n/m) (NCFC) - Klobo04, Feb 8, 21:25:13
- +3 (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 8, 21:24:32
- Can't possibly be that high... -2 (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 8, 21:26:33
- My worry is that... (NCFC) - ghost of hucks, Feb 8, 20:54:05
- don't agree (NCFC) - earthleakage, Feb 8, 21:09:38
- Remind me of how many games Becchio gets? (n/m) (NCFC) - ghost of hucks, Feb 8, 21:14:41
- I guess I'm wrong then and talking rot. Sorry bout that. (n/m) (NCFC) - ghost of hucks, Feb 8, 21:32:16
- 33 minutes this season, more than enough to prove himself (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 8, 21:29:49
- 9 (n/m) (NCFC) - Bristol Graham, Feb 8, 21:17:43
- Remind me of how many games Becchio gets? (n/m) (NCFC) - ghost of hucks, Feb 8, 21:14:41
- If you mean if Hoops is injured then definitely (NCFC) - Tonypowellshandbag, Feb 8, 21:01:38
- Spot on (NCFC) - LowestoftBoy, Feb 8, 20:57:33
- RVW is a better player... (NCFC) - loz, Feb 8, 20:56:08
- I agree with your sentiment. Typical negative 'normal' approach to what might happen (NCFC) - Upperjarroldmiddle, Feb 8, 20:59:52
- I like the Dutch, my niece and nephew are Dutch. (n/m) (NCFC) - ghost of hucks, Feb 8, 21:02:00
- The Wolfie Witch Hunt continues (NCFC) - Under soil heating, Feb 8, 20:59:46
- his confidence is shot completely (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 8, 21:04:14
- He's awful at the moment. Becchio looked sharp during his 10 minute cameo against Hull (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 8, 20:58:37
- Ha ha 10 min cameo (n/m) (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Feb 8, 21:24:13
- He is, and he did. (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Man, Feb 8, 20:59:14
- I agree with your sentiment. Typical negative 'normal' approach to what might happen (NCFC) - Upperjarroldmiddle, Feb 8, 20:59:52
- don't agree (NCFC) - earthleakage, Feb 8, 21:09:38
- How good is it to feel so upbeat about a superb performance today (NCFC) - Tonypowellshandbag, Feb 8, 20:49:36
- I didn't think we were superb. Man City didn't turn up (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Feb 8, 20:57:56
- Vet (n/m) (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Feb 8, 21:19:07
- Ha ha vmt (n/m) (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Feb 8, 21:19:45
- Vet (n/m) (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Feb 8, 21:19:07
- We've played well in the last 2 games (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 8, 20:56:54
- We have, and it is, but this feels so much better than a couple of weeks ago... (NCFC) - Old Man, Feb 8, 21:02:01
- I didn't think we were superb. Man City didn't turn up (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Feb 8, 20:57:56
- Will Hoots bring back Jonas and Snod for the Wet Spam game (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Feb 8, 20:18:10
- I think Snod will be back for sure (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 8, 20:20:07
- Sadly, I think you will be right (NCFC) - Kev, Feb 8, 20:56:26
- He shouldnt change the best looking set up we've had for months.. (NCFC) - Tonypowellshandbag, Feb 8, 20:34:00
- Redmond looked far better on the right (NCFC) - LowestoftBoy, Feb 8, 20:45:10
- I'd like to see the team that finished against Cardiff (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 8, 20:38:21
- It will be an interesting one.... West Ham have found some form (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 8, 20:24:26
- I think Snod will be back for sure (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 8, 20:20:07
- A foo thoughts (NCFC) - Jim, Feb 8, 20:04:02
- Re Redders, have to remember that's it's taken Lennon and Walcott (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 8, 20:05:38
- Yes but pace is the key in the premier to beat defenders and provide (NCFC) - Tonypowellshandbag, Feb 8, 20:40:57
- It took Ronaldo a year or two before he really became world class at United (NCFC) - Klobo04, Feb 8, 20:21:40
- the fear I have with Redmond (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 8, 20:24:52
- I think its composure (NCFC) - Klobo04, Feb 8, 20:27:24
- yeah, you could be right (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 8, 20:32:24
- Ruel Fox was the same when he broke in (NCFC) - NJ_Canary, Feb 8, 21:55:00
- yeah, you could be right (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 8, 20:32:24
- even today he stretched them not often but they couldn't handle him (NCFC) - lovely old job, Feb 8, 20:26:57
- Where he shoots from doesn't help him much (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 8, 20:26:40
- Spot on (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 8, 20:26:19
- I think its composure (NCFC) - Klobo04, Feb 8, 20:27:24
- he needs a tap in, he just needs a break, but overall today we saw a team who cares (NCFC) - lovely old job, Feb 8, 20:24:01
- the fear I have with Redmond (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 8, 20:24:52
- His does seem amazingly bad though (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 8, 20:10:18
- I agree and we've got a hell of a player on our hands when he does! (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Feb 8, 20:09:42
- Re Redders, have to remember that's it's taken Lennon and Walcott (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 8, 20:05:38
- Sunderland could still be in trouble I reckon... (NCFC) - loz, Feb 8, 17:49:37
- vmt - would be amazed if they didn't go down. (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 8, 17:52:16
- everyone is still in trouble (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 8, 17:51:33
- Yea but popular opinion seems to be Sunderland safe after their run (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Feb 8, 17:52:08
- dumb opinion.... they are 1 point off the drop zone. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 8, 17:55:16
- Hoping they have "peaked" too soon (n/m) (NCFC) - derbyshire canary, Feb 8, 17:55:05
- this is the porblem for them (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 8, 17:56:55
- Sunderland will not go down. Today was purely a result of Brown's sending off (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Feb 8, 17:58:56
- no chance - they're going down (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 8, 17:59:20
- Sunderland will not go down. Today was purely a result of Brown's sending off (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Feb 8, 17:58:56
- this is the porblem for them (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 8, 17:56:55
- Yea but popular opinion seems to be Sunderland safe after their run (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Feb 8, 17:52:08
- Really enjoyed that (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 8, 17:48:20
- back to the games vs Man Utd and Arsenal last season..... (NCFC) - usacanary, Feb 8, 18:00:57
- I think we've tried that away from home as well (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 8, 18:02:32
- V and M and bloody absolutely T (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim Nasium, Feb 8, 17:57:02
- agreed, Olsson was excellent I thought (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 8, 17:51:26
- agree, Yobo looked great after the early error (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 8, 17:53:43
- He really did took a lot of unfair stick before even playing looks a great signing (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Feb 8, 17:54:28
- yes, a great boost by the looks of it (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 8, 17:57:02
- who from? I thought the resounding opinion, was he was a good signing (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 8, 17:56:55
- saw a lot of comment saying otherwise (NCFC) - matt in london, Feb 8, 18:02:45
- He was excellent. Bennett will only come in to replace Bertie (who still looks shaky) (n/m) (NCFC) - bobble, Feb 8, 18:21:26
- saw a lot of comment saying otherwise (NCFC) - matt in london, Feb 8, 18:02:45
- He really did took a lot of unfair stick before even playing looks a great signing (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Feb 8, 17:54:28
- agree, Yobo looked great after the early error (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 8, 17:53:43
- Could be an epic day (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 8, 17:50:01
- Lucky loser? (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 8, 17:51:33
- back to the games vs Man Utd and Arsenal last season..... (NCFC) - usacanary, Feb 8, 18:00:57
- Hoots rested Snod (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Feb 8, 17:41:51
- Thats not what he said......... (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Feb 8, 17:43:55
- He was being diplomatic (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Feb 8, 17:46:05
- FFS Larry..... even Snoddy has said he has been playing injured. (NCFC) - usacanary, Feb 8, 17:54:24
- Could have played but Hoots wanted to rest him for Tues (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Feb 8, 18:00:27
- Because he said he was slightly injured and didn't want to risk him (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Feb 8, 18:06:51
- So Hoots rested him (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Feb 8, 19:31:14
- I'd put him in for Pilks and keep Redders in (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 8, 18:23:14
- Because he said he was slightly injured and didn't want to risk him (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Feb 8, 18:06:51
- Could have played but Hoots wanted to rest him for Tues (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Feb 8, 18:00:27
- FFS Larry..... even Snoddy has said he has been playing injured. (NCFC) - usacanary, Feb 8, 17:54:24
- He was being diplomatic (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Feb 8, 17:46:05
- Good decision. Use the pace today to play on the break (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 8, 17:43:13
- Guile? Snodgrass? (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Feb 8, 17:49:05
- Jeez you were far more enjoyable when you were banging out essays on shite Scottish teams. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, Feb 8, 17:55:03
- I don't like him. I never have. Your "Iwan was shite in his first season here, so Ricky's (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Feb 8, 17:57:49
- That's not what I said, as I believe you well know. (NCFC) - Arganth, Feb 8, 18:14:54
- No, I've never liked Snodgrass. On RVW: would you be saying this about anyone who hadn't (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Feb 8, 18:19:22
- That's not what I said, as I believe you well know. (NCFC) - Arganth, Feb 8, 18:14:54
- I don't like him. I never have. Your "Iwan was shite in his first season here, so Ricky's (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Feb 8, 17:57:49
- Jeez you were far more enjoyable when you were banging out essays on shite Scottish teams. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, Feb 8, 17:55:03
- well, if he did it was an excellent decision from the manager (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 8, 17:47:48
- i would keep todays team for west Ham (n/m) (NCFC) - Kar1, Feb 8, 17:44:10
- I think I'd bring in Snodgrass for Pilkington (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 8, 17:49:37
- Guile? Snodgrass? (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Feb 8, 17:49:05
- Thats not what he said......... (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Feb 8, 17:43:55
- Wolfie witch hunt (NCFC) - Under soil heating, Feb 8, 17:34:24
- Disaster of a signing (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 8, 17:44:51
- Im guessing you hate his backhand.......... (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Feb 8, 17:59:11
- disagree... he looked frustrated from the moment he entered the fray (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 8, 17:40:19
- it wasn't a sitter at all (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 8, 17:42:25
- As for Bassong, he is a defender. (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 8, 17:44:10
- doesn't matter (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 8, 17:45:15
- Bassong is a defender!! If we are relying on them for goals we are doomed. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 8, 17:45:47
- i think it's fair to expect your centre backs to score 3 or 4 a season from set pieces (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 8, 17:46:59
- each or between them.... (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 8, 17:53:08
- i think it's fair to expect your centre backs to score 3 or 4 a season from set pieces (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 8, 17:46:59
- Bassong is a defender!! If we are relying on them for goals we are doomed. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 8, 17:45:47
- doesn't matter (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 8, 17:45:15
- it went through his legs... how easy a chance do you want in this league? (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 8, 17:43:04
- Bassong's chance (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 8, 17:44:34
- The chance fell to a defender who failed to convert (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 8, 17:46:35
- Bassong's chance (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 8, 17:44:34
- As for Bassong, he is a defender. (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 8, 17:44:10
- it wasn't a sitter at all (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 8, 17:42:25
- I agree. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, Feb 8, 17:39:23
- Agree - ridiculous amount of dissin' him on the WotB. I still think he'll come good. (n/m) (NCFC) - derbyshire canary, Feb 8, 17:39:06
- agreed - it seems to be a confidence issue more than anything (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 8, 17:37:40
- half agree with you (NCFC) - matgore, Feb 8, 17:37:07
- looks like a little boy lost. Booked for a ludicrous challenge, has lost all confidence, (NCFC) - bobble, Feb 8, 17:39:11
- i desparately want him to do well but he doesnt look confident (NCFC) - matt in london, Feb 8, 17:43:26
- vimto, he seems a lovely chap and wants to do well for us, a goal will set him going! (n/m) (NCFC) - bobble, Feb 8, 17:49:00
- i desparately want him to do well but he doesnt look confident (NCFC) - matt in london, Feb 8, 17:43:26
- looks like a little boy lost. Booked for a ludicrous challenge, has lost all confidence, (NCFC) - bobble, Feb 8, 17:39:11
- Disaster of a signing (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 8, 17:44:51
- Is the person interviewing Hoots on Sky at the moment a giant? He's really having to look (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Feb 8, 17:30:39
- Hoot's is only 5' 7" (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 8, 17:31:12
- He is a bit titchy but the way he's looking up makes me think the interviewer was standing (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Feb 8, 17:32:25
- Hoot's is only 5' 7" (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 8, 17:31:12
- Sheep Derby? Swans to keep Cardiff down? Cardiff to keep Swans poor run going? (Other Football) - South_West_Canary, Feb 8, 17:24:00
- Draw would be ace (Other Football) - phrankin, Feb 8, 17:27:32
- Today is a great result regardless of what has gone before (NCFC) - norway, Feb 8, 17:12:19
- Yep, spot on. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, Feb 8, 17:21:26
- difference is we did have a go and could have won it (NCFC) - eddie, Feb 8, 17:14:20
- I'd have been an outer even if we'd won (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 8, 17:25:58
- lol (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 8, 17:43:25
- we had arguably the best chances. (n/m) (NCFC) - bobble, Feb 8, 17:19:59
- A lot to do with injuries... I can't imagine a side with Gutierrez and Snod doing the same (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 8, 17:16:10
- I'd have been an outer even if we'd won (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 8, 17:25:58
- ^ This (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Feb 8, 17:13:58
- Happy and annoyed we're so poor up front (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 8, 17:23:46
- Agreed (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Feb 8, 17:15:36
- We always look a lot, lot harder to beat when Tettey plays (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Feb 8, 17:11:50
- Tettey was the kind of players who know when to foul the player (NCFC) - XXL16, Feb 8, 17:18:58
- Yeah, Martin made a bad mistake and then Tettey took a yellow for the team (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Feb 8, 17:23:13
- Been a big blow him missing for so long. Still not sure Hoots has been able to play what (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Feb 8, 17:15:17
- Has to be a three with Tettey, Fer and Howson. (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Feb 8, 17:16:48
- what news on Howson? (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 8, 17:19:16
- Sorry, don't rate Howson much he dunt create nuffin and he is no good at defendun (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Feb 8, 17:18:59
- I think he is badly used by Hughton. (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 8, 17:22:14
- Yep, that looks a very decent midfield (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 8, 17:17:22
- Has to be a three with Tettey, Fer and Howson. (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Feb 8, 17:16:48
- Does the simple things!! Passes forward, just looks motivated and up for it... (NCFC) - hoolahan, Feb 8, 17:14:28
- He's a hustler and a bustler and a in yer facer! (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Feb 8, 17:15:54
- I think the opposition take one look at him and don't fancy their chances so back off (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Feb 8, 17:17:26
- He's a hustler and a bustler and a in yer facer! (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Feb 8, 17:15:54
- Tettey was the kind of players who know when to foul the player (NCFC) - XXL16, Feb 8, 17:18:58
- Wolfal looks like a player who thinks that he isn't good enough (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Feb 8, 17:05:32
- That Iwan Roberts was shit, wasn't he? (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, Feb 8, 17:12:16
- was awful for a season yes. Mike Sheron too... and Peter Thorne (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 8, 17:14:38
- Exactly. So why the hell are people writing RVW off already? (NCFC) - Arganth, Feb 8, 17:23:42
- There are no bigger pictures with RVW. He's appalling. And physically, never mind anything (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Feb 8, 17:34:45
- Because he has been really rubbish... (and keeps getting picked) (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 8, 17:29:13
- aaaaand so was Iwan in his first season. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, Feb 8, 17:34:59
- yep, he was fat and unfit. But there are no guarantees (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 8, 17:50:41
- Yes he could. (NCFC) - Arganth, Feb 8, 17:58:53
- yep, he was fat and unfit. But there are no guarantees (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 8, 17:50:41
- aaaaand so was Iwan in his first season. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, Feb 8, 17:34:59
- Exactly. So why the hell are people writing RVW off already? (NCFC) - Arganth, Feb 8, 17:23:42
- was awful for a season yes. Mike Sheron too... and Peter Thorne (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 8, 17:14:38
- And given that - given his body language even on the bench when Hoops was injured (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Feb 8, 17:07:33
- he needs a loan out (NCFC) - matgore, Feb 8, 17:06:51
- he just needs what all strikers need in a bad run.. (NCFC) - colincanary, Feb 8, 17:08:12
- dunno, I think he's not going to come good, at least not for us (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 8, 17:21:30
- I was thinking the same, shame we can't send him on loon for a month (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 8, 17:07:47
- Even a few U21 games might help (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Feb 8, 17:09:47
- he just needs what all strikers need in a bad run.. (NCFC) - colincanary, Feb 8, 17:08:12
- That Iwan Roberts was shit, wasn't he? (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, Feb 8, 17:12:16
- cant work out how rvw is ahead of becchio at the moment (NCFC) - earlydoors, Feb 8, 17:05:20
- I thougth Becchio would have held the ball up better today (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 8, 17:44:27
- The only reason can be his price tag... (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 8, 17:06:37
- Price tag (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Feb 8, 17:06:19
- Man City looked like they thought they only had to turn up to win (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Feb 8, 17:02:41
- they were awful on the day... desperate for a goal and they had one player in the box (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 8, 17:03:50
- Yeah, don't think it was because our players were brill but cos Man City didn't turn up (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Feb 8, 17:08:19
- We were excellent in defence. But that is how you can get results against top sides (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 8, 17:10:44
- True (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Feb 8, 17:12:31
- We were excellent in defence. But that is how you can get results against top sides (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 8, 17:10:44
- Yeah, don't think it was because our players were brill but cos Man City didn't turn up (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Feb 8, 17:08:19
- they were awful on the day... desperate for a goal and they had one player in the box (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 8, 17:03:50
- Good performance, should have won (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 8, 16:57:25
- RvW should have scored and Pilks should have pulled the ball back for RvW (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Feb 8, 17:07:00
- disagree... Man City never properly threatened (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 8, 17:09:41
- VMT (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 8, 16:58:35
- Lol (n/m) (NCFC) - derbyshire canary, Feb 8, 16:58:10
- RvW should have scored and Pilks should have pulled the ball back for RvW (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Feb 8, 17:07:00
- Brilliant result, brilliant display, best of Hughton. (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Feb 8, 16:54:18
- well deserved draw (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 8, 16:56:50
- Just a shame we didn't win (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 8, 16:56:36
- the only downside, the league table looks worse than before the match (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 8, 16:55:56
- It was always going to. We expected to lose. Palace played brom, both couldn't lose. (n/m) (NCFC) - Tony Martin, Feb 8, 16:57:29
- Matters not. Did what we had to. (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Feb 8, 16:56:27
- Agree. Would have looked worse if we'd lost! (n/m) (NCFC) - derbyshire canary, Feb 8, 16:57:12
- Well done lads! (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Feb 8, 16:53:42
- no - they did but we played well (n/m) (NCFC) - matgore, Feb 8, 16:56:14
- a lot down to our organised defense... just a shame we are so shit at scoring (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 8, 16:54:28
- Great Point today. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 8, 16:53:14
- Hughton ordering players back.... Yawn. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 8, 16:52:25
- cant really criticise him much today surely? (n/m) (NCFC) - earlydoors, Feb 8, 16:53:00
- why not? he is a hugely negative individual (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 8, 16:53:46
- pot, kettle, black (n/m) (NCFC) - earlydoors, Feb 8, 16:56:56
- I'm not manager of the football club (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 8, 16:59:10
- pot, kettle, black (n/m) (NCFC) - earlydoors, Feb 8, 16:56:56
- why not? he is a hugely negative individual (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 8, 16:53:46
- cant really criticise him much today surely? (n/m) (NCFC) - earlydoors, Feb 8, 16:53:00
- Becchio would have put that chance away... (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 8, 16:51:30
- RvW...... just wow, how did he miss it. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 8, 16:48:18
- Was behind him (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Feb 8, 17:06:18
- Because he's crap (n/m) (NCFC) - Tony Martin, Feb 8, 16:49:23
- because he's not very good (n/m) (NCFC) - earlydoors, Feb 8, 16:48:56
- Come on CIty!!!!! (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 8, 16:47:09
- VMT (n/m) (NCFC) - derbyshire canary, Feb 8, 16:47:33
- How has RvW looked? (n/m) (NCFC) - Adster, Feb 8, 16:43:36
- missed a sitter (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 8, 16:46:48
- again (n/m) (NCFC) - John in Texas, Feb 8, 16:48:16
- missed a sitter (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 8, 16:46:48