Completely agree with most of that
the response to going behind was refreshing and encouraging - certainly contrasts to most of the times we have gone behind this season.
I don't agree though that Hughton looked to play for a point at home. I think he tried to balance defence and attack, and generally did quite well at home. Away from home the balance was all wrong - particularly in the last few games.
Posted By: Mecagoenti on April 20th 2014 at 17:41:58
Message Thread
- One thought about today. (NCFC) - Bungle, Apr 20, 17:23:11
- we've been like that at home for most of the last two seasons (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Apr 20, 17:26:10
- We really really haven't been like that at home for two seasons. (NCFC) - Yellalee, Apr 20, 17:27:34
- agree that in style we haven't been the same (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Apr 20, 17:28:52
- Have to disagree there. To concede though, we did HAVE to play like that today (NCFC) - Yellalee, Apr 20, 17:37:37
- we did have some similar performances under hughton (NCFC) - matt in london, Apr 20, 17:49:19
- Yep true. That's why I'm being a bit guarded about 'Adams v Hughton' teams - too early (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Apr 20, 17:51:55
- given it's hughton's squad and no time to work with them (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 20, 17:54:18
- Yep, can only assume that. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Apr 20, 17:55:42
- given it's hughton's squad and no time to work with them (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 20, 17:54:18
- Yep true. That's why I'm being a bit guarded about 'Adams v Hughton' teams - too early (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Apr 20, 17:51:55
- Completely agree with most of that (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Apr 20, 17:41:58
- I think 'looking to play for a point' is a statement open to argument, to be honest. (NCFC) - Yellalee, Apr 20, 17:49:08
- hear hear. (n/m) (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Apr 20, 17:41:16
- we did have some similar performances under hughton (NCFC) - matt in london, Apr 20, 17:49:19
- i can't understand how you can be SO wrong about football under Hughton! (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Apr 20, 17:35:34
- thanks for your contribution to the discussion (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Apr 20, 17:36:17
- you're welcome. (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Apr 20, 17:37:55
- thanks for your contribution to the discussion (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Apr 20, 17:36:17
- erm... that is exactly what we did for the majority of home under Hughton (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 20, 17:29:57
- Actually, I think you do as much as he does (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Apr 20, 17:34:59
- OK..... (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Apr 20, 17:48:50
- how many times were we 2-0 down at home under Hughton? (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Apr 20, 17:51:18
- STOP FUCKING DEFENDING HIM YOU FUCKING LOST (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 20, 17:52:44
- Sweary Mikey. Differing views are healthy. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Apr 20, 17:54:12
- he's losing the plot ;) (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 20, 18:51:18
- lol (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 20, 17:54:42
- Sweary Mikey. Differing views are healthy. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Apr 20, 17:54:12
- STOP FUCKING DEFENDING HIM YOU FUCKING LOST (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 20, 17:52:44
- how many times were we 2-0 down at home under Hughton? (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Apr 20, 17:51:18
- No striker under Hughton's Norwich has been able to score for toffee (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 20, 17:48:14
- OK..... (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Apr 20, 17:48:50
- we didn't play for a draw at home (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Apr 20, 17:32:49
- oh dear.... (n/m) (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Apr 20, 17:54:19
- You have the most selective memory ever. (NCFC) - Bungle, Apr 20, 17:41:31
- we didn't play for the draw in any of those (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Apr 20, 17:42:57
- Don't you remember Hughton's comments after the Everton win last season (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 20, 17:44:34
- was that the one when his substitution changed the game? (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Apr 20, 17:47:28
- Yep, it was the one where he told everyone he "would have settled for that" (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 20, 17:49:07
- I think this underlines how much of a hiding to nothing Hughton was on (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Apr 20, 17:52:42
- No, the post match remark was an insight into his mind (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 20, 17:57:21
- HE WAS FUCKING SHIT (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 20, 17:53:08
- vmt (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 20, 17:50:12
- I think this underlines how much of a hiding to nothing Hughton was on (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Apr 20, 17:52:42
- Yep, it was the one where he told everyone he "would have settled for that" (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 20, 17:49:07
- was that the one when his substitution changed the game? (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Apr 20, 17:47:28
- Don't you remember Hughton's comments after the Everton win last season (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 20, 17:44:34
- we didn't play for the draw in any of those (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Apr 20, 17:42:57
- aside from the whole of last season... where we settled for draws game after game (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 20, 17:39:19
- Actually, I think you do as much as he does (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Apr 20, 17:34:59
- Have to disagree there. To concede though, we did HAVE to play like that today (NCFC) - Yellalee, Apr 20, 17:37:37
- Agree completely, Lee. (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Apr 20, 17:28:25
- agree that in style we haven't been the same (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Apr 20, 17:28:52
- We really really haven't been like that at home for two seasons. (NCFC) - Yellalee, Apr 20, 17:27:34
- Yes (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Apr 20, 17:24:29
- we've been like that at home for most of the last two seasons (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Apr 20, 17:26:10
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.