sorry but I'm not applying the wrong test

I am saying one has to query the judgment that "it was more likely than not" that a jury would convict because any reasonable or right thinking jury was never going to convict on the basis of her word against his and with, it appears, little or no other evidence to prove or disprove either party's story.

I accept you could argue that the protection for the accused is that they will get a reasonable jury to hear the case and that reasonable jury will find the accused not guilty as they did in this case and hopefully in most cases that ensures the correct outcome but I am sure that it is not the case all of the time.

Posted By: Jim on September 10th 2013 at 17:00:41


Message Thread


Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.

Log in