No it isn't, f**kwit
Page 102 says "If a defending player steps behind his own goal line in order to place an opponent in an offside position, the referee shall allow play to continue and caution the defender for deliberately leaving the field of play without the refereeās permission when the ball is next out of play."
What Kapl has been quoted as saying is that "article 11.4.1. of the refereeing code stipulated that 'an opposing player cannot be offside when one of the last two defenders has left the field of play'."
Those are DIFFERENT WORDS. They mean DIFFERENT THINGS.
Posted By: Old Git on June 10th 2008 at 13:13:04
Message Thread
- If it's what some of you want, cos I'm a good bloke, I'm wrong about the rule (n/m) (General Chat) - pants, Jun 10, 12:21:09
- It seems that (General Chat) - Cannydc, Jun 10, 12:31:11
- I've just read the Laws of the Game on FIFA's website (General Chat) - yarmyyarmy, Jun 10, 12:26:23
- It's on page 102... (General Chat) - Declan, Jun 10, 12:31:25
- He was pushed. (General Chat) - Cannydc, Jun 10, 12:42:00
- "in order to place an opponent in an offside position" (General Chat) - yarmyyarmy, Jun 10, 12:47:34
- Well, by that rule he definitely *was* offside and Keith Hackett is full of shit. (General Chat) - yarmyyarmy, Jun 10, 12:36:05
- As far as I can see, the rules don't actually say anything about this situation (General Chat) - Tricky Hawes, Jun 10, 12:43:37
- But I thought you were saying it was all so simple? (General Chat) - Old Git, Jun 10, 12:47:27
- well that would clinch it, but where did you see that? (n/m) (General Chat) - Tricky Hawes, Jun 10, 12:50:53
- ah - just seen the ref to that on the beeb website (General Chat) - Tricky Hawes, Jun 10, 12:54:19
- Ridiculous (General Chat) - Old Git, Jun 10, 12:57:47
- Only all over the entire web (General Chat) - Old Git, Jun 10, 12:52:17
- Only no-one can find that quote in any of the rules (n/m) (General Chat) - Holden Caulfield, Jun 10, 12:53:34
- exactly (General Chat) - Tricky Hawes, Jun 10, 12:55:40
- Yes, I'd agree with that - it's massively unclear (General Chat) - Holden Caulfield, Jun 10, 12:59:39
- I guess one thing... (General Chat) - mr carra, Jun 10, 13:10:07
- that's probably true (General Chat) - Tricky Hawes, Jun 10, 13:05:02
- Yes, I'd agree with that - it's massively unclear (General Chat) - Holden Caulfield, Jun 10, 12:59:39
- Nope (General Chat) - Old Git, Jun 10, 12:55:20
- and that bloke is referring to the rule we've all seen (General Chat) - Tricky Hawes, Jun 10, 12:58:14
- Well he's obviously not, actually (General Chat) - Old Git, Jun 10, 13:07:13
- scroll down to page 102 and it's there. (n/m) (General Chat) - Tricky Hawes, Jun 10, 13:08:23
- No it isn't, fuckwit (General Chat) - Old Git, Jun 10, 13:13:04
- oh, acksherly that's a different version to the one I was looking at before (General Chat) - Tricky Hawes, Jun 10, 13:12:36
- Actually, my brother is a qualified ref. (General Chat) - Arizona Bay, Jun 10, 13:21:47
- Oh loo, you've done it again, another admission in breach of WOTB protocol (General Chat) - Old Git, Jun 10, 13:14:36
- (so he obviously is, actually.) (n/m) (General Chat) - Tricky Hawes, Jun 10, 13:08:53
- I might take this to the European Court (General Chat) - Holden Caulfield, Jun 10, 13:08:13
- The noise you just heard was OG falling off his chair at the word "free". (n/m) (General Chat) - Arizona Bay, Jun 10, 13:10:25
- The word "free" causes me physical pain in this context (n/m) (General Chat) - Old Git, Jun 10, 13:13:35
- The noise you just heard was OG falling off his chair at the word "free". (n/m) (General Chat) - Arizona Bay, Jun 10, 13:10:25
- scroll down to page 102 and it's there. (n/m) (General Chat) - Tricky Hawes, Jun 10, 13:08:23
- Well he's obviously not, actually (General Chat) - Old Git, Jun 10, 13:07:13
- and that bloke is referring to the rule we've all seen (General Chat) - Tricky Hawes, Jun 10, 12:58:14
- exactly (General Chat) - Tricky Hawes, Jun 10, 12:55:40
- Only no-one can find that quote in any of the rules (n/m) (General Chat) - Holden Caulfield, Jun 10, 12:53:34
- ah - just seen the ref to that on the beeb website (General Chat) - Tricky Hawes, Jun 10, 12:54:19
- well that would clinch it, but where did you see that? (n/m) (General Chat) - Tricky Hawes, Jun 10, 12:50:53
- But I thought you were saying it was all so simple? (General Chat) - Old Git, Jun 10, 12:47:27
- So will the goal now be dis-allowed? (n/m) (General Chat) - CB41, Jun 10, 12:38:39
- Ah, but see Jim's "ref can do he likes" rule (n/m) (General Chat) - Holden Caulfield, Jun 10, 12:37:47
- As far as I can see, the rules don't actually say anything about this situation (General Chat) - Tricky Hawes, Jun 10, 12:43:37
- And if he'd deliberately jumped in the stand he'd have more than likely been cautioned! (n/m) (General Chat) - Declan, Jun 10, 12:32:12
- He was pushed. (General Chat) - Cannydc, Jun 10, 12:42:00
- It's on page 102... (General Chat) - Declan, Jun 10, 12:31:25
- Oi (n/m) (General Chat) - iwans_ex_dentist, Jun 10, 12:23:42
- scream for cream (General Chat) - pants, Jun 10, 12:24:35
- Tears for Fears (n/m) (General Chat) - iwans_ex_dentist, Jun 10, 12:25:00
- now if we were playing mallets mallet, you'd get a bonk on the head (n/m) (General Chat) - pants, Jun 10, 12:28:35
- Timmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmaaaaaaaaaay (n/m) (General Chat) - iwans_ex_dentist, Jun 10, 12:29:34
- now if we were playing mallets mallet, you'd get a bonk on the head (n/m) (General Chat) - pants, Jun 10, 12:28:35
- Tears for Fears (n/m) (General Chat) - iwans_ex_dentist, Jun 10, 12:25:00
- scream for cream (General Chat) - pants, Jun 10, 12:24:35
- Diddums :-) (n/m) (General Chat) - CB41, Jun 10, 12:22:27
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.