oh, acksherly that's a different version to the one I was looking at before
sorry
and maybe you're right that there is a reffing code that goes into this on more detail.
Do we not have a ref on here? Disappointing.
Posted By: Tricky Hawes on June 10th 2008 at 13:12:36
Message Thread
- If it's what some of you want, cos I'm a good bloke, I'm wrong about the rule (n/m) (General Chat) - pants, Jun 10, 12:21:09
- It seems that (General Chat) - Cannydc, Jun 10, 12:31:11
- I've just read the Laws of the Game on FIFA's website (General Chat) - yarmyyarmy, Jun 10, 12:26:23
- It's on page 102... (General Chat) - Declan, Jun 10, 12:31:25
- He was pushed. (General Chat) - Cannydc, Jun 10, 12:42:00
- "in order to place an opponent in an offside position" (General Chat) - yarmyyarmy, Jun 10, 12:47:34
- Well, by that rule he definitely *was* offside and Keith Hackett is full of shit. (General Chat) - yarmyyarmy, Jun 10, 12:36:05
- As far as I can see, the rules don't actually say anything about this situation (General Chat) - Tricky Hawes, Jun 10, 12:43:37
- But I thought you were saying it was all so simple? (General Chat) - Old Git, Jun 10, 12:47:27
- well that would clinch it, but where did you see that? (n/m) (General Chat) - Tricky Hawes, Jun 10, 12:50:53
- ah - just seen the ref to that on the beeb website (General Chat) - Tricky Hawes, Jun 10, 12:54:19
- Ridiculous (General Chat) - Old Git, Jun 10, 12:57:47
- Only all over the entire web (General Chat) - Old Git, Jun 10, 12:52:17
- Only no-one can find that quote in any of the rules (n/m) (General Chat) - Holden Caulfield, Jun 10, 12:53:34
- exactly (General Chat) - Tricky Hawes, Jun 10, 12:55:40
- Yes, I'd agree with that - it's massively unclear (General Chat) - Holden Caulfield, Jun 10, 12:59:39
- I guess one thing... (General Chat) - mr carra, Jun 10, 13:10:07
- that's probably true (General Chat) - Tricky Hawes, Jun 10, 13:05:02
- Yes, I'd agree with that - it's massively unclear (General Chat) - Holden Caulfield, Jun 10, 12:59:39
- Nope (General Chat) - Old Git, Jun 10, 12:55:20
- and that bloke is referring to the rule we've all seen (General Chat) - Tricky Hawes, Jun 10, 12:58:14
- Well he's obviously not, actually (General Chat) - Old Git, Jun 10, 13:07:13
- scroll down to page 102 and it's there. (n/m) (General Chat) - Tricky Hawes, Jun 10, 13:08:23
- No it isn't, fuckwit (General Chat) - Old Git, Jun 10, 13:13:04
- oh, acksherly that's a different version to the one I was looking at before (General Chat) - Tricky Hawes, Jun 10, 13:12:36
- Actually, my brother is a qualified ref. (General Chat) - Arizona Bay, Jun 10, 13:21:47
- Oh loo, you've done it again, another admission in breach of WOTB protocol (General Chat) - Old Git, Jun 10, 13:14:36
- (so he obviously is, actually.) (n/m) (General Chat) - Tricky Hawes, Jun 10, 13:08:53
- I might take this to the European Court (General Chat) - Holden Caulfield, Jun 10, 13:08:13
- The noise you just heard was OG falling off his chair at the word "free". (n/m) (General Chat) - Arizona Bay, Jun 10, 13:10:25
- The word "free" causes me physical pain in this context (n/m) (General Chat) - Old Git, Jun 10, 13:13:35
- The noise you just heard was OG falling off his chair at the word "free". (n/m) (General Chat) - Arizona Bay, Jun 10, 13:10:25
- scroll down to page 102 and it's there. (n/m) (General Chat) - Tricky Hawes, Jun 10, 13:08:23
- Well he's obviously not, actually (General Chat) - Old Git, Jun 10, 13:07:13
- and that bloke is referring to the rule we've all seen (General Chat) - Tricky Hawes, Jun 10, 12:58:14
- exactly (General Chat) - Tricky Hawes, Jun 10, 12:55:40
- Only no-one can find that quote in any of the rules (n/m) (General Chat) - Holden Caulfield, Jun 10, 12:53:34
- ah - just seen the ref to that on the beeb website (General Chat) - Tricky Hawes, Jun 10, 12:54:19
- well that would clinch it, but where did you see that? (n/m) (General Chat) - Tricky Hawes, Jun 10, 12:50:53
- But I thought you were saying it was all so simple? (General Chat) - Old Git, Jun 10, 12:47:27
- So will the goal now be dis-allowed? (n/m) (General Chat) - CB41, Jun 10, 12:38:39
- Ah, but see Jim's "ref can do he likes" rule (n/m) (General Chat) - Holden Caulfield, Jun 10, 12:37:47
- As far as I can see, the rules don't actually say anything about this situation (General Chat) - Tricky Hawes, Jun 10, 12:43:37
- And if he'd deliberately jumped in the stand he'd have more than likely been cautioned! (n/m) (General Chat) - Declan, Jun 10, 12:32:12
- He was pushed. (General Chat) - Cannydc, Jun 10, 12:42:00
- It's on page 102... (General Chat) - Declan, Jun 10, 12:31:25
- Oi (n/m) (General Chat) - iwans_ex_dentist, Jun 10, 12:23:42
- scream for cream (General Chat) - pants, Jun 10, 12:24:35
- Tears for Fears (n/m) (General Chat) - iwans_ex_dentist, Jun 10, 12:25:00
- now if we were playing mallets mallet, you'd get a bonk on the head (n/m) (General Chat) - pants, Jun 10, 12:28:35
- Timmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmaaaaaaaaaay (n/m) (General Chat) - iwans_ex_dentist, Jun 10, 12:29:34
- now if we were playing mallets mallet, you'd get a bonk on the head (n/m) (General Chat) - pants, Jun 10, 12:28:35
- Tears for Fears (n/m) (General Chat) - iwans_ex_dentist, Jun 10, 12:25:00
- scream for cream (General Chat) - pants, Jun 10, 12:24:35
- Diddums :-) (n/m) (General Chat) - CB41, Jun 10, 12:22:27
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.