heres why I am guessing the Cuffley article was pulled
I have no proof, this is all hypothetical and purely guessing.
If as I suggest above that something could have happened and the saud person was allowed to walk.
If someone close to the situation explained the nature of what happened behind the scenes to Archant, it would make the article both innacurate and inappropriate.
It would also make the statement by the club "wholly appropriate"
I worked at a place when I was a kid and a guy was allowed/suggested/told to "resign" rather than the police being involved in the situation.
He had worked there 15 years so I am guessing this played into the management decision.
Posted By: usacanary on March 4th 2011 at 20:24:35
Message Thread
- Anyone get a chance to read the David Cuffley article before it vanished? (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 4, 19:41:17
- why do folk *have* to know? for what purpose exactly, to titillate all the billy no-mates? (NCFC) - Tombs, Mar 4, 20:09:46
- well said (NCFC) - emmaroyds, Mar 4, 20:17:20
- shame it had to be said really (NCFC) - Tombs, Mar 4, 20:20:10
- Not unsurprisingly.......tombs totally misses the point. (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 4, 20:30:32
- that's ok, i'm not fussed with you at all. (NCFC) - Tombs, Mar 4, 20:35:19
- ^^^^ owned and tilted.................a rare combo. (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 4, 20:36:31
- don't diss the tombs I'm his right hand man in waiting and I'll (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Mar 4, 20:35:00
- Tell your mate to leave the thinking to the big boys. (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 4, 20:37:50
- this is how it starts (n/m) (NCFC) - emmaroyds, Mar 4, 20:31:41
- errr.... McNally unhappy with article.........Article pulled by Archant........ (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 4, 20:35:39
- why should we be concerned? (NCFC) - emmaroyds, Mar 4, 20:41:44
- errr.... McNally unhappy with article.........Article pulled by Archant........ (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 4, 20:35:39
- that's ok, i'm not fussed with you at all. (NCFC) - Tombs, Mar 4, 20:35:19
- Not unsurprisingly.......tombs totally misses the point. (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 4, 20:30:32
- shame it had to be said really (NCFC) - Tombs, Mar 4, 20:20:10
- well said (NCFC) - emmaroyds, Mar 4, 20:17:20
- From what I can gather (NCFC) - emmaroyds, Mar 4, 19:46:15
- Having read the article before it was pulled (NCFC) - KentonCanary, Mar 4, 20:56:50
- well, they've pulled it now, so presumably they acknowledged it was out of place (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Mar 4, 19:48:00
- Or were they forced too?........Did one board member phone another! (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 4, 19:57:59
- dunno, possibly. Wouldn't think so though (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Mar 4, 20:09:58
- Or were they forced too?........Did one board member phone another! (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 4, 19:57:59
- nothing offensive just stating that the clubs 1 paragragh statement was not (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Mar 4, 19:43:56
- So why was it pulled? (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 4, 19:54:17
- It was pulled because McNasty got on their case (NCFC) - emmaroyds, Mar 4, 20:00:40
- If he didnt want a fuss he shouldnt have used twitter (n/m) (NCFC) - samcd84, Mar 4, 20:39:01
- seems the only way people comunicate these days (NCFC) - emmaroyds, Mar 4, 20:45:00
- But its bollocks........... (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 4, 20:14:00
- yes Platt could have trousered the 25m for all we know (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Mar 4, 20:17:54
- 'Personal reasons' meant no party wanted to make a fuss. Cuffley made a fuss. He was asked (NCFC) - matchdaypie, Mar 4, 20:52:21
- yes Platt could have trousered the 25m for all we know (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Mar 4, 20:17:54
- If he didnt want a fuss he shouldnt have used twitter (n/m) (NCFC) - samcd84, Mar 4, 20:39:01
- The problem was McNally's tweets stirred the pot consdierably (NCFC) - samcd84, Mar 4, 19:58:12
- But that seems weird because.......... (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 4, 20:10:42
- that's a hell of a lot of speculation (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Mar 4, 20:17:56
- Maybe Cuffley should have contacted the club first. (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 4, 20:26:24
- you could have a point there (NCFC) - emmaroyds, Mar 4, 20:15:09
- heres why I am guessing the Cuffley article was pulled (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 4, 20:24:35
- that's a hell of a lot of speculation (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Mar 4, 20:17:56
- *in the circumstances* curious phrase - more questions than answers etc (NCFC) - norway, Mar 4, 20:01:18
- But that seems weird because.......... (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 4, 20:10:42
- It was pulled because McNasty got on their case (NCFC) - emmaroyds, Mar 4, 20:00:40
- So why was it pulled? (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 4, 19:54:17
- why do folk *have* to know? for what purpose exactly, to titillate all the billy no-mates? (NCFC) - Tombs, Mar 4, 20:09:46
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.