Anyone get a chance to read the David Cuffley article before it vanished?

What was so offensive that it needed to be pulled?

Reading all the various Archant twitters...... ist obvious the silence is very telling......

Why doesnt a person in the know come on here and post anonymously about the story behind the story...........

Posted By: usacanary on March 4th 2011 at 19:41:17

Message Thread

Anyone get a chance to read the David Cuffley article before it vanished? (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 4, 19:41:17
- why do folk *have* to know? for what purpose exactly, to titillate all the billy no-mates? (NCFC) - Tombs, Mar 4, 20:09:46
  - well said (NCFC) - emmaroyds, Mar 4, 20:17:20
    - shame it had to be said really (NCFC) - Tombs, Mar 4, 20:20:10
      - Not unsurprisingly.......tombs totally misses the point. (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 4, 20:30:32
        
        that's ok, i'm not fussed with you at all. (NCFC) - Tombs, Mar 4, 20:35:19
        
        ^^^^ owned and tilted.................a rare combo. (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 4, 20:36:31
        
        don't diss the tombs I'm his right hand man in waiting and I'll (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Mar 4, 20:35:00
        
        Tell your mate to leave the thinking to the big boys. (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 4, 20:37:50
        
        grrrrrr (n/m) (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Mar 4, 20:39:08
        
        this is how it starts (n/m) (NCFC) - emmaroyds, Mar 4, 20:31:41
        
        errr.... McNally unhappy with article.........Article pulled by Archant........ (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 4, 20:35:39
        
        why should we be concerned? (NCFC) - emmaroyds, Mar 4, 20:41:44
- From what I can gather (NCFC) - emmaroyds, Mar 4, 19:46:15
  - Having read the article before it was pulled (NCFC) - KentonCanary, Mar 4, 20:56:50
  - well, they've pulled it now, so presumably they acknowledged it was out of place (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Mar 4, 19:48:00
    - Or were they forced too?........Did one board member phone another! (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 4, 19:57:59
      - dunno, possibly. Wouldn't think so though (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Mar 4, 20:09:58
- nothing offensive just stating that the clubs 1 paragragh statement was not (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Mar 4, 19:43:56
  - So why was it pulled? (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 4, 19:54:17
    - It was pulled because McNasty got on their case (NCFC) - emmaroyds, Mar 4, 20:00:40
      - If he didnt want a fuss he shouldnt have used twitter (n/m) (NCFC) - samcd84, Mar 4, 20:39:01
        
        seems the only way people comunicate these days (NCFC) - emmaroyds, Mar 4, 20:45:00
      - But its bollocks........... (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 4, 20:14:00
        
        yes Platt could have trousered the 25m for all we know (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Mar 4, 20:17:54
        
        'Personal reasons' meant no party wanted to make a fuss. Cuffley made a fuss. He was asked (NCFC) - matchdaypie, Mar 4, 20:52:21
    - The problem was McNally's tweets stirred the pot consdierably (NCFC) - samcd84, Mar 4, 19:58:12
      - But that seems weird because.......... (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 4, 20:10:42
        
        that's a hell of a lot of speculation (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Mar 4, 20:17:56
        
        Maybe Cuffley should have contacted the club first. (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 4, 20:26:24
        
        you could have a point there (NCFC) - emmaroyds, Mar 4, 20:15:09
        
        heres why I am guessing the Cuffley article was pulled (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 4, 20:24:35
      - *in the circumstances* curious phrase - more questions than answers etc (NCFC) - norway, Mar 4, 20:01:18

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.