I know CWC does not agree with me on this but I think we do. I think that sort of
decision would be unfairly prejudicial to the three relegated clubs who would effectively be forced by such a decision to surrender their shareholding in the premier league.
Posted By: Jim on May 11th 2020 at 17:32:03
Message Thread
- Premier league asking the government to reconsider neutral grounds plan (NCFC) - Duck, May 11, 15:53:54
- Link for original post? (n/m) (NCFC) - Chicken, May 11, 16:56:55
- Also FA chairman Greg Clarke has told the Premier League the FA wouldn’t ratify (NCFC) - Duck, May 11, 16:26:15
- Not really sure how he alone can say that? May change his tune if faced with (NCFC) - Jim, May 11, 16:48:52
- He might do (NCFC) - Duck, May 11, 16:56:05
- Not so sure think of season unfinished bottom 3 have a better legal case... (NCFC) - loz, May 11, 17:01:47
- What legal case? (NCFC) - Duck, May 11, 17:09:33
- I know CWC does not agree with me on this but I think we do. I think that sort of (NCFC) - Jim, May 11, 17:32:03
- I think there's possibly something of an argument (NCFC) - paulg, May 11, 18:22:58
- The key issue, as I understand it, would be whether the act taken is (NCFC) - Jim, May 11, 18:30:39
- It needs to not be unfairly prejudicial (NCFC) - CWC, May 11, 18:39:20
- I never said it did need to be equally unfair to everyone (NCFC) - Jim, May 11, 18:54:14
- Wasnt really suggesting you did (NCFC) - CWC, May 11, 19:01:33
- On that we agree. I suppose it’s just by which pathway we are likely to (NCFC) - Jim, May 11, 19:07:33
- Wasnt really suggesting you did (NCFC) - CWC, May 11, 19:01:33
- Tbh, I have no real ideas about the Prem's constitution (NCFC) - paulg, May 11, 18:43:38
- Yep (NCFC) - CWC, May 11, 18:55:26
- Presumably (NCFC) - paulg, May 11, 20:01:14
- Yep (NCFC) - CWC, May 11, 18:55:26
- I never said it did need to be equally unfair to everyone (NCFC) - Jim, May 11, 18:54:14
- It needs to not be unfairly prejudicial (NCFC) - CWC, May 11, 18:39:20
- The key issue, as I understand it, would be whether the act taken is (NCFC) - Jim, May 11, 18:30:39
- Potentially. (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, May 11, 17:40:39
- I think there's possibly something of an argument (NCFC) - paulg, May 11, 18:22:58
- We’ll see we have a contract for a full season not 29 games ... (NCFC) - loz, May 11, 17:31:10
- Incorrect (NCFC) - Duck, May 11, 17:43:10
- Well it does state that: (NCFC) - Jim, May 11, 17:51:25
- We don;t have a contract but the rules do say 38 games so the rules would (NCFC) - Jim, May 11, 17:33:23
- Exactly sky running with the bottom half of the league don’t want relegation... (NCFC) - loz, May 11, 18:10:04
- All clubs will have top lawyers though, I do agree though that if the (NCFC) - Jim, May 11, 18:24:10
- Exactly sky running with the bottom half of the league don’t want relegation... (NCFC) - loz, May 11, 18:10:04
- Incorrect (NCFC) - Duck, May 11, 17:43:10
- I know CWC does not agree with me on this but I think we do. I think that sort of (NCFC) - Jim, May 11, 17:32:03
- What legal case? (NCFC) - Duck, May 11, 17:09:33
- yeah this (NCFC) - CWC, May 11, 16:58:33
- It’s our only hope IMO (n/m) (NCFC) - Duck, May 11, 17:06:50
- Not so sure think of season unfinished bottom 3 have a better legal case... (NCFC) - loz, May 11, 17:01:47
- Exactly some wealthy clubs down there (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, May 11, 16:53:42
- He might do (NCFC) - Duck, May 11, 16:56:05
- tbf we don't know the context of that opposition (NCFC) - CWC, May 11, 16:34:21
- Not really sure how he alone can say that? May change his tune if faced with (NCFC) - Jim, May 11, 16:48:52
- Not just the "rebel 6" then. Funny that. (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, May 11, 16:14:58
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.