Obviously

But you're trying to make out that Neil hasn't spent a truck load of cash just because we've sold some other players in the meantime.

His 60m is still his 60m - well only know his actual net spend when we look back in a few years and net off what those players get sold for.

Posted By: CWC on March 4th 2017 at 22:15:07

Message Thread

As a few people kept trotting out the numbers of 60M...... (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 4, 21:22:39
- Truly terrible recruitment. worst thing is he doesn't even believe in his own signings (n/m) (NCFC) - roedtonowhere, Mar 4, 21:30:16
  - That is by far the most troubling. (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 4, 21:36:31
- He's still spent $60m on players (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Mar 4, 21:26:32
  - I think net spend is important....... again...... (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 4, 21:41:32
    - Net spend would be relevant when totting up the cost of (NCFC) - CWC, Mar 4, 21:55:06
      - there will always be overlap....... (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 4, 21:59:22
        
        Obviously (NCFC) - CWC, Mar 4, 22:15:07
    - If that's the case then Rafa has spent -£30M at Newcastle (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Mar 4, 21:49:00
      - And that there is the answer (NCFC) - Tombs, Mar 4, 21:58:40
      - Well thats true. And clearly done a good job. (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 4, 21:57:12
  - Aussie (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Mar 4, 21:34:24
  - US keyboard? $ or £ (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 4, 21:31:42

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.