Net spend would be relevant when totting up the cost of
Those he bought compared to what he/we sell them for.
Not sure it's at that relevant where talking about selling players bought by someone else, unless he had done something to improve the value of said player.
Posted By: CWC on March 4th 2017 at 21:55:06
Message Thread
- As a few people kept trotting out the numbers of 60M...... (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 4, 21:22:39
- Truly terrible recruitment. worst thing is he doesn't even believe in his own signings (n/m) (NCFC) - roedtonowhere, Mar 4, 21:30:16
- That is by far the most troubling. (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 4, 21:36:31
- He's still spent $60m on players (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Mar 4, 21:26:32
- I think net spend is important....... again...... (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 4, 21:41:32
- Net spend would be relevant when totting up the cost of (NCFC) - CWC, Mar 4, 21:55:06
- there will always be overlap....... (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 4, 21:59:22
- If that's the case then Rafa has spent -£30M at Newcastle (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Mar 4, 21:49:00
- And that there is the answer (NCFC) - Tombs, Mar 4, 21:58:40
- Well thats true. And clearly done a good job. (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 4, 21:57:12
- Net spend would be relevant when totting up the cost of (NCFC) - CWC, Mar 4, 21:55:06
- Aussie (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Mar 4, 21:34:24
- US keyboard? $ or £ (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 4, 21:31:42
- I think net spend is important....... again...... (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 4, 21:41:32
- Truly terrible recruitment. worst thing is he doesn't even believe in his own signings (n/m) (NCFC) - roedtonowhere, Mar 4, 21:30:16
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.