He's still spent $60m on players
Posted By: thirsty work on March 4th 2017 at 21:26:32
Message Thread
- As a few people kept trotting out the numbers of 60M...... (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 4, 21:22:39
- Truly terrible recruitment. worst thing is he doesn't even believe in his own signings (n/m) (NCFC) - roedtonowhere, Mar 4, 21:30:16
- That is by far the most troubling. (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 4, 21:36:31
- He's still spent $60m on players (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Mar 4, 21:26:32
- I think net spend is important....... again...... (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 4, 21:41:32
- Net spend would be relevant when totting up the cost of (NCFC) - CWC, Mar 4, 21:55:06
- there will always be overlap....... (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 4, 21:59:22
- If that's the case then Rafa has spent -£30M at Newcastle (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Mar 4, 21:49:00
- And that there is the answer (NCFC) - Tombs, Mar 4, 21:58:40
- Well thats true. And clearly done a good job. (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 4, 21:57:12
- Net spend would be relevant when totting up the cost of (NCFC) - CWC, Mar 4, 21:55:06
- Aussie (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Mar 4, 21:34:24
- US keyboard? $ or £ (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 4, 21:31:42
- I think net spend is important....... again...... (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 4, 21:41:32
- Truly terrible recruitment. worst thing is he doesn't even believe in his own signings (n/m) (NCFC) - roedtonowhere, Mar 4, 21:30:16
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.