I do see your point

but was the clause a deal breaker? Can sort of understand it on Earnie, but surely we had the strength with dickson?
I know its not a bad profit, but like i said elsewhere, if the club were buying him i'd like to think they believed he had the ability to become a premiership player, and therefore worth at least £1.5m, and so should of had a higher clause.
If that alone caused him to turn us down then we should of said "thanks but no thanks".

Posted By: megson on July 17th 2007 at 09:04:55


Message Thread


Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.

Log in