Players used to cope with it.
As I said right at the start, this was the position until the 1960s, if not later.
Clearly, there are limits to the condition the ball is allowed to get into. Taking lumps out of it is fairly obvious.
The consequences of altering the ball often used to come back to haunt the fielding side. If they went too far and it just became a soft pudding, they'd then get tanked around for a long time.
If you want to look at some of the discussions on this, try to look up some of Boycott's writings. He's in favour of changing the laws for the same reasons I am. Ttry umpiring it or try to take wickets on a flat pitch with no assistance from the ball. In both cases, it's extremely difficult.
Posted By: InTheAbsenceOfAHorse on August 23rd 2006 at 11:21:07
Message Thread
- Haha - Woolmer wants cheating made legal (General Chat) - WorthyHatesFans, Aug 23, 10:07:14
- I've done umpiring exams..... (General Chat) - InTheAbsenceOfAHorse, Aug 23, 10:14:31
- Yeah, I think that because it's too hard to tell if someone's (General Chat) - WorthyHatesFans, Aug 23, 10:28:20
- There's a clear difference. (General Chat) - InTheAbsenceOfAHorse, Aug 23, 10:32:46
- Is it too batsman friendly? (General Chat) - WorthyHatesFans, Aug 23, 10:40:24
- Look at Test averages. (General Chat) - InTheAbsenceOfAHorse, Aug 23, 10:48:35
- I think it's totally fine and about right (General Chat) - WorthyHatesFans, Aug 23, 10:53:49
- You're entitled to that opinion...... (General Chat) - InTheAbsenceOfAHorse, Aug 23, 10:55:38
- Anal probably (General Chat) - WorthyHatesFans, Aug 23, 10:56:52
- You're entitled to that opinion...... (General Chat) - InTheAbsenceOfAHorse, Aug 23, 10:55:38
- I think it's totally fine and about right (General Chat) - WorthyHatesFans, Aug 23, 10:53:49
- Look at Test averages. (General Chat) - InTheAbsenceOfAHorse, Aug 23, 10:48:35
- Indeed (General Chat) - BerlinCanary, Aug 23, 10:35:27
- Because it would make batting for lower middle order and tail (General Chat) - WorthyHatesFans, Aug 23, 10:43:20
- No...... (General Chat) - InTheAbsenceOfAHorse, Aug 23, 10:50:33
- Actually, why not just bite huge chunks out of the ball? (General Chat) - WorthyHatesFans, Aug 23, 10:58:08
- You haven't addressed any of the problems I highlighted (n/m) (General Chat) - WorthyHatesFans, Aug 23, 10:54:26
- Whereas you have clearly tackled my evidence...... (General Chat) - InTheAbsenceOfAHorse, Aug 23, 11:01:05
- Your rule change woul.d literally mean teams could take (General Chat) - WorthyHatesFans, Aug 23, 11:10:18
- Players used to cope with it. (General Chat) - InTheAbsenceOfAHorse, Aug 23, 11:21:07
- So you'd have a new rule that permits only certain degrees of gouging? (n/m) (General Chat) - WorthyHatesFans, Aug 23, 11:33:24
- I've done both, thanks (n/m) (General Chat) - WorthyHatesFans, Aug 23, 11:24:48
- Players used to cope with it. (General Chat) - InTheAbsenceOfAHorse, Aug 23, 11:21:07
- Your rule change woul.d literally mean teams could take (General Chat) - WorthyHatesFans, Aug 23, 11:10:18
- Whereas you have clearly tackled my evidence...... (General Chat) - InTheAbsenceOfAHorse, Aug 23, 11:01:05
- No...... (General Chat) - InTheAbsenceOfAHorse, Aug 23, 10:50:33
- Because it would make batting for lower middle order and tail (General Chat) - WorthyHatesFans, Aug 23, 10:43:20
- Is it too batsman friendly? (General Chat) - WorthyHatesFans, Aug 23, 10:40:24
- There's a clear difference. (General Chat) - InTheAbsenceOfAHorse, Aug 23, 10:32:46
- Yeah, I think that because it's too hard to tell if someone's (General Chat) - WorthyHatesFans, Aug 23, 10:28:20
- I've done umpiring exams..... (General Chat) - InTheAbsenceOfAHorse, Aug 23, 10:14:31
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.