Your rule change woul.d literally mean teams could take
huge chunks out of the ball, with their teeth, specially grown sharp fingernails (don't think they wouldn't!).
You can't have lawlessness and I really don't think you've thought it through.
Who cares if batsmen's averages are higher? That's what the vast majority of people want to see - more runs, more boundaries, and if test match results are being achieved because of the more positive play, then good.
If you take these rules away then the condition of cricket balls after 30 overs would become farcical. There, I've answered. Now you answer how 5/11 of every team could possibly hope to stand a chance against opening bowlers, bowling at 90mph with an old ball with gouges in it and swinging all over the place?
I think your position, and Woolmers, is ludicrous, but you're too stubborn to admit it.
Posted By: WorthyHatesFans on August 23rd 2006 at 11:10:18
Message Thread
- Haha - Woolmer wants cheating made legal (General Chat) - WorthyHatesFans, Aug 23, 10:07:14
- I've done umpiring exams..... (General Chat) - InTheAbsenceOfAHorse, Aug 23, 10:14:31
- Yeah, I think that because it's too hard to tell if someone's (General Chat) - WorthyHatesFans, Aug 23, 10:28:20
- There's a clear difference. (General Chat) - InTheAbsenceOfAHorse, Aug 23, 10:32:46
- Is it too batsman friendly? (General Chat) - WorthyHatesFans, Aug 23, 10:40:24
- Look at Test averages. (General Chat) - InTheAbsenceOfAHorse, Aug 23, 10:48:35
- I think it's totally fine and about right (General Chat) - WorthyHatesFans, Aug 23, 10:53:49
- You're entitled to that opinion...... (General Chat) - InTheAbsenceOfAHorse, Aug 23, 10:55:38
- Anal probably (General Chat) - WorthyHatesFans, Aug 23, 10:56:52
- You're entitled to that opinion...... (General Chat) - InTheAbsenceOfAHorse, Aug 23, 10:55:38
- I think it's totally fine and about right (General Chat) - WorthyHatesFans, Aug 23, 10:53:49
- Look at Test averages. (General Chat) - InTheAbsenceOfAHorse, Aug 23, 10:48:35
- Indeed (General Chat) - BerlinCanary, Aug 23, 10:35:27
- Because it would make batting for lower middle order and tail (General Chat) - WorthyHatesFans, Aug 23, 10:43:20
- No...... (General Chat) - InTheAbsenceOfAHorse, Aug 23, 10:50:33
- Actually, why not just bite huge chunks out of the ball? (General Chat) - WorthyHatesFans, Aug 23, 10:58:08
- You haven't addressed any of the problems I highlighted (n/m) (General Chat) - WorthyHatesFans, Aug 23, 10:54:26
- Whereas you have clearly tackled my evidence...... (General Chat) - InTheAbsenceOfAHorse, Aug 23, 11:01:05
- Your rule change woul.d literally mean teams could take (General Chat) - WorthyHatesFans, Aug 23, 11:10:18
- Players used to cope with it. (General Chat) - InTheAbsenceOfAHorse, Aug 23, 11:21:07
- So you'd have a new rule that permits only certain degrees of gouging? (n/m) (General Chat) - WorthyHatesFans, Aug 23, 11:33:24
- I've done both, thanks (n/m) (General Chat) - WorthyHatesFans, Aug 23, 11:24:48
- Players used to cope with it. (General Chat) - InTheAbsenceOfAHorse, Aug 23, 11:21:07
- Your rule change woul.d literally mean teams could take (General Chat) - WorthyHatesFans, Aug 23, 11:10:18
- Whereas you have clearly tackled my evidence...... (General Chat) - InTheAbsenceOfAHorse, Aug 23, 11:01:05
- No...... (General Chat) - InTheAbsenceOfAHorse, Aug 23, 10:50:33
- Because it would make batting for lower middle order and tail (General Chat) - WorthyHatesFans, Aug 23, 10:43:20
- Is it too batsman friendly? (General Chat) - WorthyHatesFans, Aug 23, 10:40:24
- There's a clear difference. (General Chat) - InTheAbsenceOfAHorse, Aug 23, 10:32:46
- Yeah, I think that because it's too hard to tell if someone's (General Chat) - WorthyHatesFans, Aug 23, 10:28:20
- I've done umpiring exams..... (General Chat) - InTheAbsenceOfAHorse, Aug 23, 10:14:31
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.