I may be repeating but
Bailey is spot on; many, many fans were determined to make Dean Smith solely culpable for our failings, and yesterday showed how wrong they were.
Wagner's decision to drop Gunn (after using the Cup to have a look at Krul) is a worrying precedent. What exactly had Gunn done to deserve being dropped? I am equally unconvinced by the reinstatement of Onel as a starter.
Dowell's early chance actually went out of play (behind the byeline) yet it appears as though the officials missed this & played on. Can anyone confirm?
KidWatch
Tom Dickson-Peters got his first senior goal yesterday (for Grimsby)
Barden & Berry & Tomkinson all got 90 mins under their belts (2-2, 2-1, 0-0)
Springett got 15 mins (5-0)
Blair & Mair were both victims of K Lynn & Notts Co not naming a sub GK
Posted By: Henclrikus on February 5th 2023 at 15:40:18
Message Thread
- I may be repeating but (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 5, 15:40:18
- Well done wrathers. … 100 posts on this. (NCFC) - Under soil heating, Feb 5, 19:19:11
- It isn’t (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Feb 5, 19:22:15
- Yep the narrative was set tbf (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 5, 19:25:12
- It isn’t (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Feb 5, 19:22:15
- The yo-yo’ing is boring (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Feb 5, 18:35:14
- Lots of opinions about individual games are bullshit (NCFC) - paulg, Feb 5, 18:51:07
- Thanks for the KidWatch, go on TDP (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 5, 18:33:10
- I don't think either keeper is really in Wagners plans (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Feb 5, 17:10:16
- I don't think it's fair to say he doesn't like Angus. (NCFC) - Captain Bligh, Feb 5, 17:26:14
- 3-4 games and you think he doesn't like Gunny? I'm sure an experienced (NCFC) - protheroe fitzgibbon, Feb 5, 17:18:36
- Isn’t Gunn injured ? (n/m) (NCFC) - helvegtheowl, Feb 5, 16:55:34
- Of course…the ‘convenient’ thing to do (NCFC) - MonkeyPuzzle, Feb 5, 16:10:26
- What I came away with yesterday was the time wasted by Deansmith to coach the team into (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Feb 5, 16:07:56
- “Possible” that Burnley have better players? (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Feb 5, 18:36:12
- This "team identity" (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 5, 16:59:44
- That's what I'm frustrated about. He didn't have one and never looked like getting one (n/m) (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Feb 5, 17:21:10
- I wouldn't have been bothered about what style of play he wanted to play in (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Feb 5, 17:31:34
- I am trying to see your p.o.v (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 5, 17:41:47
- Was there not a minutes applause for a fan bang after Burnley got their goal? (NCFC) - Rufus Rednuts, Feb 5, 18:15:41
- 😄 (n/m) (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Feb 5, 18:19:18
- It's possible that if this is the start of a year of pretty awful results and performances (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Feb 5, 18:05:11
- Nails it (NCFC) - Cardiff Canary, Feb 5, 19:13:57
- ABS = Anyone But Smith (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 5, 18:13:37
- Thank you for explaining ABS - actually I'm not really sure that does apply to me (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Feb 5, 18:24:43
- I would be an utter twat if I was defending DS (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 5, 18:43:38
- We won 6 in a row very unconvincingly with smith … (NCFC) - loz, Feb 5, 19:06:14
- The narrative was set early with Smith (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 5, 18:39:42
- I would be an utter twat if I was defending DS (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 5, 18:43:38
- Thank you for explaining ABS - actually I'm not really sure that does apply to me (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Feb 5, 18:24:43
- Top post (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, Feb 5, 18:11:09
- 👍 (n/m) (NCFC) - Under soil heating, Feb 5, 18:09:05
- I don’t get what point you’re trying to make (NCFC) - Under soil heating, Feb 5, 17:54:40
- None of that is controversial (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 5, 19:12:59
- Smith had over a year people did give him a chance ? (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Feb 5, 19:29:47
- Well said 👏 (Do you want to take over as spokesperson for the ABS?) (n/m) (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Feb 5, 18:11:57
- Lol. Maybe I’ll do Sundays-Tuesday, you can do Wed-Frid? (NCFC) - Under soil heating, Feb 5, 18:31:45
- I like it! Job share (n/m) (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Feb 5, 18:35:17
- Lol. Maybe I’ll do Sundays-Tuesday, you can do Wed-Frid? (NCFC) - Under soil heating, Feb 5, 18:31:45
- Agree (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, Feb 5, 18:11:21
- Well, the fans who 'forgave' Krul yesterday (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 5, 18:04:10
- I think then that they must be the sort of fans who always have a go at players who make (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Feb 5, 18:10:24
- He got horrific stick yesterday. (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, Feb 5, 18:11:55
- Not in the immediate aftermath of the goal (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 5, 18:19:07
- No. There was applause. For the girl who died. (NCFC) - norwaay, Feb 5, 18:22:04
- *long* (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, Feb 5, 18:22:26
- Unless you were sitting in the same block of the same stand (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 5, 18:35:11
- I see. (NCFC) - norwaay, Feb 5, 18:44:40
- yes (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 5, 19:06:21
- Tacitly or otherwise (NCFC) - norwaay, Feb 5, 19:38:01
- yes (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 5, 19:06:21
- I see. (NCFC) - norwaay, Feb 5, 18:44:40
- Unless you were sitting in the same block of the same stand (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 5, 18:35:11
- *long* (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, Feb 5, 18:22:26
- No. There was applause. For the girl who died. (NCFC) - norwaay, Feb 5, 18:22:04
- But NOT as horrific as he would have of got if Deansmith was still in charge 😊 (n/m) (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Feb 5, 18:17:52
- Not in the immediate aftermath of the goal (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 5, 18:19:07
- He got horrific stick yesterday. (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, Feb 5, 18:11:55
- I think then that they must be the sort of fans who always have a go at players who make (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Feb 5, 18:10:24
- Exactly we had him for over a year and made us worse … (NCFC) - loz, Feb 5, 18:02:31
- None of that is controversial (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 5, 19:12:59
- Was there not a minutes applause for a fan bang after Burnley got their goal? (NCFC) - Rufus Rednuts, Feb 5, 18:15:41
- I’m fine letting smith go (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 5, 17:34:19
- What is 'The current shambles'? - the loss to table topping Burnley? (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Feb 5, 17:38:24
- I've 180'd on it. I was critical of the DS critics and the talk of identity (NCFC) - Captain Bligh, Feb 5, 19:52:42
- The defending yesterday was utterly abysmal (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 5, 17:49:17
- What is 'The current shambles'? - the loss to table topping Burnley? (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Feb 5, 17:38:24
- I am trying to see your p.o.v (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 5, 17:41:47
- Isn't it entirely possibly (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 5, 17:27:57
- Well if that's the case, I'm not sure why we didn't sack him earlier because (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Feb 5, 17:34:58
- So is the definition of 'shambles' how you perform against Burnley? (n/m) (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Feb 5, 18:13:59
- Was obvious he tried to mage us more pragmatic … (NCFC) - loz, Feb 5, 17:30:08
- Well if that's the case, I'm not sure why we didn't sack him earlier because (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Feb 5, 17:34:58
- I wouldn't have been bothered about what style of play he wanted to play in (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Feb 5, 17:31:34
- A team comfortable in possession … (NCFC) - loz, Feb 5, 17:08:41
- This wasn't a Q for you (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 5, 17:25:42
- Because the other side were perfectly happy for us to have it … (NCFC) - loz, Feb 5, 17:27:36
- Just a couple of small things (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 5, 17:35:39
- Webber kept hold of sinani because smith liked him pre season … (NCFC) - loz, Feb 5, 18:05:31
- Let's see the source for this (n/m) (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 5, 18:09:41
- The source is Dean smith himself … (NCFC) - loz, Feb 5, 18:14:43
- So there is no source for your claim that Webber kept him (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 5, 18:28:32
- Smith regularly picked poor players tbh not sure why you are so stern in your defence of… (NCFC) - loz, Feb 5, 18:46:16
- So there is no source for your claim that Webber kept him (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 5, 18:28:32
- The source is Dean smith himself … (NCFC) - loz, Feb 5, 18:14:43
- Let's see the source for this (n/m) (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 5, 18:09:41
- Do you think we should have stuck with Smith? (n/m) (NCFC) - paulg, Feb 5, 17:42:34
- no (n/m) (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 5, 17:44:17
- So what exactly is your point? (NCFC) - paulg, Feb 5, 17:51:32
- Many, many fans entirely blamed Smith (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 5, 17:54:58
- Smith had over a year Wagner has had 4 games what are you talking about ????? (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Feb 5, 18:06:10
- See above, USH's post. (n/m) (NCFC) - paulg, Feb 5, 17:58:58
- Many, many fans entirely blamed Smith (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 5, 17:54:58
- So what exactly is your point? (NCFC) - paulg, Feb 5, 17:51:32
- no (n/m) (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 5, 17:44:17
- Webber kept hold of sinani because smith liked him pre season … (NCFC) - loz, Feb 5, 18:05:31
- Just a couple of small things (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 5, 17:35:39
- Because the other side were perfectly happy for us to have it … (NCFC) - loz, Feb 5, 17:27:36
- This wasn't a Q for you (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 5, 17:25:42
- That's what I'm frustrated about. He didn't have one and never looked like getting one (n/m) (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Feb 5, 17:21:10
- Krul has been dreadful though (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 5, 16:13:33
- We weren't bad defensively yesterday (NCFC) - paulg, Feb 5, 16:36:31
- Quite important areas though (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 5, 16:40:03
- Very much, and so we lost (NCFC) - paulg, Feb 5, 16:53:30
- We clearly can defend corners (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 5, 17:02:59
- Keeper thing (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 5, 17:22:08
- Assume (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 5, 16:54:32
- We clearly can defend corners (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 5, 17:02:59
- Very much, and so we lost (NCFC) - paulg, Feb 5, 16:53:30
- Quite important areas though (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 5, 16:40:03
- Gunn is injured (NCFC) - Cardiff Canary, Feb 5, 16:21:32
- 67% (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 5, 16:27:48
- And I didn’t think Gunn was injured before (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 5, 16:28:42
- and stayed with Krul even after being shakey (!) at Cov (n/m) (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 5, 16:33:19
- Angus is injured! (n/m) (NCFC) - Captain Bligh, Feb 5, 17:29:02
- He wasn't inj for games at PNE & Coventry (n/m) (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 5, 17:43:43
- We don't know if there were some pre niggles before yesterday (NCFC) - Captain Bligh, Feb 5, 18:58:44
- He wasn't inj for games at PNE & Coventry (n/m) (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 5, 17:43:43
- Angus is injured! (n/m) (NCFC) - Captain Bligh, Feb 5, 17:29:02
- and stayed with Krul even after being shakey (!) at Cov (n/m) (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 5, 16:33:19
- And I didn’t think Gunn was injured before (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 5, 16:28:42
- 67% (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 5, 16:27:48
- We weren't bad defensively yesterday (NCFC) - paulg, Feb 5, 16:36:31
- I don't think many fans solely thought a change of manager would fix issues (NCFC) - seminated_woolly, Feb 5, 15:48:04
- They were very smug after the last 2 league games (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 5, 15:55:00
- Not sure who they are or who was smug (NCFC) - seminated_woolly, Feb 5, 15:58:17
- You haven't been paying attention then (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 5, 16:10:03
- I would say your negative and equally smug view is every bit as tedious (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Feb 5, 18:47:29
- Not sure what you are getting at we at least looked vaguely exciting … (NCFC) - loz, Feb 5, 16:25:16
- The point is clear (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 5, 16:29:44
- That we are a work in progress and there has been some questionable recruitment … (NCFC) - loz, Feb 5, 16:32:28
- He defo should be (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 5, 16:40:45
- That we are a work in progress and there has been some questionable recruitment … (NCFC) - loz, Feb 5, 16:32:28
- The point is clear (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 5, 16:29:44
- It was a relief (NCFC) - Cardiff Canary, Feb 5, 16:24:25
- Missing the point totally (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 5, 16:29:27
- The point was a strawman argument (n/m) (NCFC) - Cardiff Canary, Feb 5, 19:11:00
- how is it a strawman argument? (n/m) (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 5, 20:16:25
- The point was a strawman argument (n/m) (NCFC) - Cardiff Canary, Feb 5, 19:11:00
- Missing the point totally (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 5, 16:29:27
- Not sure what you are getting at we at least looked vaguely exciting … (NCFC) - loz, Feb 5, 16:22:20
- There was a stupid assumption among some that somehow we were a top 2 team being held back (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Feb 5, 18:42:25
- We were regularly beating bang average (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 5, 16:01:30
- You haven't been paying attention then (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 5, 16:10:03
- Not sure who they are or who was smug (NCFC) - seminated_woolly, Feb 5, 15:58:17
- They were very smug after the last 2 league games (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 5, 15:55:00
- Chris Goreham confirmed it had gone out (NCFC) - Cellophane Flowers, Feb 5, 15:47:17
- I still can't see how they missed it (NCFC) - Kangol Canary, Feb 5, 16:22:08
- but did the officials miss it & play on? (n/m) (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 5, 16:05:12
- Yes it hit Pukki who was off the pitch and they played on (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 5, 16:07:16
- Thanks. Armchair Fan 1 - 0 WentToGameFan (n/m) (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 5, 16:51:40
- Yes it hit Pukki who was off the pitch and they played on (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 5, 16:07:16
- Well done wrathers. … 100 posts on this. (NCFC) - Under soil heating, Feb 5, 19:19:11
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.