To me it seems clear
Even if we develop a player in the Chelsea way (i.e. not good enough for us but good enough for someone else) then there will prob not be a big enough transfer fee to make a profit for us.
Ahadme, Fitzpatrick, Hutchinson, Nizet, Power & Thorvaldsson cost AT LEAST £400k in fees to recruit, plus wages. And how much of that did we recoup?
Posted By: Henclrikus on April 1st 2022 at 13:14:41
Message Thread
- Byram and Dimi tomorrow then ?… (NCFC) - loz, Apr 1, 10:48:19
- Still have a chance of staying up tho (NCFC) - ParrotPuncher, Apr 1, 11:29:22
- Yeahbut (NCFC) - Nelsons final flanel, Apr 1, 13:20:25
- Aarons and Williams are out (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Apr 1, 11:54:39
- Must win game (n/m) (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Apr 1, 11:49:56
- Dimi and Williams have different strengths (NCFC) - jamesward, Apr 1, 11:36:30
- So do we go with 3/5 at the back tomorrow? (NCFC) - Maillot Jaune, Apr 1, 12:56:18
- wonder if Williams might want to stay (NCFC) - CWC, Apr 1, 11:43:17
- Having been first-choice in PL, ahead of a £10m player (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Apr 1, 12:16:29
- for his sake I'd hope not too (NCFC) - CWC, Apr 1, 12:25:40
- the squad needs a good strip-down this summer (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Apr 1, 12:35:42
- interesting decisions ahead for sure (NCFC) - CWC, Apr 1, 13:00:29
- To me it seems clear (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Apr 1, 13:14:41
- Some balance...... (NCFC) - usacanary, Apr 1, 15:19:07
- complicated isn't it? (NCFC) - CWC, Apr 1, 13:45:30
- we appear to be talking about different models (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Apr 1, 13:58:43
- are we actually operating the Chelsea model though? (NCFC) - CWC, Apr 1, 14:19:19
- No, because as already stated..... (NCFC) - usacanary, Apr 1, 15:24:11
- we can be running the same model at a lower price point (n/m) (NCFC) - CWC, Apr 1, 15:43:01
- I think their model differs in......... (NCFC) - usacanary, Apr 1, 16:25:42
- we can be running the same model at a lower price point (n/m) (NCFC) - CWC, Apr 1, 15:43:01
- No, because as already stated..... (NCFC) - usacanary, Apr 1, 15:24:11
- Isn't that because any player who isn't good for Norwich (NCFC) - jamesward, Apr 1, 14:04:29
- there is clearly a new model in play at Norwich (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Apr 1, 15:03:09
- We have never been in as good a financial position so.... (NCFC) - usacanary, Apr 1, 15:26:55
- *good enough (n/m) (NCFC) - jamesward, Apr 1, 14:05:20
- there is clearly a new model in play at Norwich (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Apr 1, 15:03:09
- are we actually operating the Chelsea model though? (NCFC) - CWC, Apr 1, 14:19:19
- we appear to be talking about different models (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Apr 1, 13:58:43
- I agree, we haven't really given the model a chance, afterall... (NCFC) - Maillot Jaune, Apr 1, 13:11:12
- To me it seems clear (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Apr 1, 13:14:41
- interesting decisions ahead for sure (NCFC) - CWC, Apr 1, 13:00:29
- the squad needs a good strip-down this summer (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Apr 1, 12:35:42
- for his sake I'd hope not too (NCFC) - CWC, Apr 1, 12:25:40
- If he does, I'd play him right back (assuming Max goes) (NCFC) - jamesward, Apr 1, 11:56:17
- Having been first-choice in PL, ahead of a £10m player (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Apr 1, 12:16:29
- Still have a chance of staying up tho (NCFC) - ParrotPuncher, Apr 1, 11:29:22
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.