A temporary lockdown would have

stopped the rise in its tracks and given them time to sort out track and trace.

It's easier to track and trace with lower numbers of infections. It gets harder and harder when numbers are so high.

I'm pretty sure Whitty said right at the very beginning it might be necessary to have a series of short lockdowns to keep it under control and stop a damaging second / third / fourth wave.

If you fail to keep numbers within reasonable limits then the economic pain, and the effect of people suffering from cancer, heart disease etc because of the strain on the NHS, will be FAR worse than a series of short, properly funded lockdowns.

Posted By: jamesward on October 29th 2020 at 09:37:45


Message Thread


Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.

Log in