I understand why too. Because nobody was prepared to pay more.

If someone thought he was an underpriced bargain for that price they would have come in and out outbid Leicester. Nobody did.

Posted By: mr carra on January 3rd 2020 at 10:24:58

Message Thread

Dereham deco worth 30m.. (NCFC) - Lager top, Jan 3, 04:39:41
- WW2 (NCFC) - APB, Jan 3, 09:57:16
- I'm guessing nobody is going to pay £40m+ for Max once we're relegated (NCFC) - mr carra, Jan 3, 09:07:50
  - Yup, best price will be in Jan. (n/m) (NCFC) - MORDENCANARY, Jan 3, 09:38:03
- And this, bluntly, (NCFC) - Cardiff Canary, Jan 3, 08:36:15
  - It just means we won’t be buying much British (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 3, 09:38:44
    - We can’t not though, with the home-grown rule. (n/m) (NCFC) - APB, Jan 3, 09:58:14
      - We can buy a bit of course (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 3, 10:04:11
        
        Young, hungry new Maddisons... (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Jan 3, 10:23:18
        
        Anyone ripping it up in League One? (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 3, 10:30:57
        
        Not nearby, no (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Jan 3, 10:34:21
        
        They rate Downes highly... (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 3, 10:37:56
- I'd want more for Toddy (NCFC) - Kangol Canary, Jan 3, 08:20:24
  - Easy to see how PL TV money doesn’t go that far these days! (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jan 3, 08:25:34
    - But we didn't spend ANY money (NCFC) - Kangol Canary, Jan 3, 09:11:00
      - Wages! Bonuses! Loan fees! (NCFC) - CWC, Jan 3, 10:36:14
- What would we hope to get for each of our young stars? (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jan 3, 07:30:49
  - What scares be more about this is (NCFC) - CWC, Jan 3, 10:23:18
    - VMT (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jan 3, 10:41:12
  - wont get so much for them if/when we're relegated (NCFC) - pab, Jan 3, 07:43:06
    - I would sell now (NCFC) - Kangol Canary, Jan 3, 08:32:56
      - Depends (NCFC) - Cardiff Canary, Jan 3, 08:47:39
    - Maybe, but it depends on how many clubs want to sign them (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jan 3, 07:45:15
  - Why does the Cantwell fee seem high ?... (NCFC) - loz, Jan 3, 07:34:59
    - I still think we undersold Maddison (NCFC) - CWC, Jan 3, 10:17:51
      - I understand why too. Because nobody was prepared to pay more. (NCFC) - mr carra, Jan 3, 10:24:58
        
        Part of the issue was our need to sell (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jan 3, 10:52:19
        
        Makes no difference... (NCFC) - mr carra, Jan 3, 11:05:05
        
        That’s not true (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jan 3, 11:36:35
        
        Yes indeed (NCFC) - CWC, Jan 3, 10:34:54
    - Because Maddison is a lot better than Cantwell, in my opinion (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jan 3, 07:43:52
      - Well that's why Maddison is being quoted at about £80m now (NCFC) - mr carra, Jan 3, 09:10:21
        
        Yes, I understand that (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jan 3, 10:16:12
        
        And to reiterate... (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jan 3, 10:24:05
        
        We didn't achieve what we have by 'competing' at that (NCFC) - mr carra, Jan 3, 10:28:29
      - Cantwell has done more for us at a higher level than Maddison (NCFC) - Kangol Canary, Jan 3, 08:31:15
        
        Yeah - I’m not complaining. Someone can give us £100m if they want to (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jan 3, 08:32:16
      - Martin Peters cost us £50K. Anything more than that is madness (n/m) (NCFC) - watfordcanary, Jan 3, 08:21:09
      - The point remains though ... (NCFC) - loz, Jan 3, 07:55:08
        
        I think I said that in my original post (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jan 3, 07:56:46
- Sell him for that and that’s the academy justified and paid for, for years (NCFC) - Tony Martin, Jan 3, 06:07:23

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.