Dereham deco worth 30m..

... that’s crazy money... also max worth 45m... gotta take that hey?

Posted By: Lager top on January 3rd 2020 at 04:39:41

Message Thread

Dereham deco worth 30m.. (NCFC) - Lager top, Jan 3, 04:39:41
- WW2 (NCFC) - APB, Jan 3, 09:57:16
- I'm guessing nobody is going to pay £40m+ for Max once we're relegated (NCFC) - mr carra, Jan 3, 09:07:50
  - Yup, best price will be in Jan. (n/m) (NCFC) - MORDENCANARY, Jan 3, 09:38:03
- And this, bluntly, (NCFC) - Cardiff Canary, Jan 3, 08:36:15
  - It just means we won’t be buying much British (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 3, 09:38:44
    - We can’t not though, with the home-grown rule. (n/m) (NCFC) - APB, Jan 3, 09:58:14
      - We can buy a bit of course (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 3, 10:04:11
        
        Young, hungry new Maddisons... (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Jan 3, 10:23:18
        
        Anyone ripping it up in League One? (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 3, 10:30:57
        
        Not nearby, no (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Jan 3, 10:34:21
        
        They rate Downes highly... (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 3, 10:37:56
- I'd want more for Toddy (NCFC) - Kangol Canary, Jan 3, 08:20:24
  - Easy to see how PL TV money doesn’t go that far these days! (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jan 3, 08:25:34
    - But we didn't spend ANY money (NCFC) - Kangol Canary, Jan 3, 09:11:00
      - Wages! Bonuses! Loan fees! (NCFC) - CWC, Jan 3, 10:36:14
- What would we hope to get for each of our young stars? (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jan 3, 07:30:49
  - What scares be more about this is (NCFC) - CWC, Jan 3, 10:23:18
    - VMT (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jan 3, 10:41:12
  - wont get so much for them if/when we're relegated (NCFC) - pab, Jan 3, 07:43:06
    - I would sell now (NCFC) - Kangol Canary, Jan 3, 08:32:56
      - Depends (NCFC) - Cardiff Canary, Jan 3, 08:47:39
    - Maybe, but it depends on how many clubs want to sign them (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jan 3, 07:45:15
  - Why does the Cantwell fee seem high ?... (NCFC) - loz, Jan 3, 07:34:59
    - I still think we undersold Maddison (NCFC) - CWC, Jan 3, 10:17:51
      - I understand why too. Because nobody was prepared to pay more. (NCFC) - mr carra, Jan 3, 10:24:58
        
        Part of the issue was our need to sell (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jan 3, 10:52:19
        
        Makes no difference... (NCFC) - mr carra, Jan 3, 11:05:05
        
        That’s not true (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jan 3, 11:36:35
        
        Yes indeed (NCFC) - CWC, Jan 3, 10:34:54
    - Because Maddison is a lot better than Cantwell, in my opinion (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jan 3, 07:43:52
      - Well that's why Maddison is being quoted at about £80m now (NCFC) - mr carra, Jan 3, 09:10:21
        
        Yes, I understand that (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jan 3, 10:16:12
        
        And to reiterate... (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jan 3, 10:24:05
        
        We didn't achieve what we have by 'competing' at that (NCFC) - mr carra, Jan 3, 10:28:29
      - Cantwell has done more for us at a higher level than Maddison (NCFC) - Kangol Canary, Jan 3, 08:31:15
        
        Yeah - I’m not complaining. Someone can give us £100m if they want to (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jan 3, 08:32:16
      - Martin Peters cost us £50K. Anything more than that is madness (n/m) (NCFC) - watfordcanary, Jan 3, 08:21:09
      - The point remains though ... (NCFC) - loz, Jan 3, 07:55:08
        
        I think I said that in my original post (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jan 3, 07:56:46
- Sell him for that and that’s the academy justified and paid for, for years (NCFC) - Tony Martin, Jan 3, 06:07:23

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.