Eh?
It was stating the obvious both were terror attacks
I asked for evidence he belonged to IS.
You were the one differentiating remember!
Fuckwit
Posted By: SCC 28 on June 19th 2017 at 10:10:55
Message Thread
- Not again! Major incident Finsbury Park... vehicle, pedestrians, one arrest (n/m) (General Chat) - Worthing Yellow, Jun 19, 01:27:18
- On behalf of all white men, I apologise for the dickhead who did it. (General Chat) - bird table, Jun 19, 09:36:01
- White person commits atrocity = mental health problems (General Chat) - pants, Jun 19, 10:25:21
- i think we should round-up and intern all clean-shaven, white men just to be sure though (n/m) (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, Jun 19, 09:57:42
- Yet another terrorist incident (n/m) (General Chat) - SCC 28, Jun 19, 04:19:40
- which terrorist organisation was it? (n/m) (General Chat) - fond, Jun 19, 09:19:42
- he doesn't have to be a member of a particular organisation to be a terrorist (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, Jun 19, 09:45:25
- Has he not paid his subs? (n/m) (General Chat) - norway, Jun 19, 09:50:05
- Which terrorist organisation was the Manchester bomber? (n/m) (General Chat) - SCC 28, Jun 19, 09:23:49
- so called ISIS (n/m) (General Chat) - fond, Jun 19, 09:25:51
- LOL any evidence? (General Chat) - SCC 28, Jun 19, 09:28:50
- ISIS claimed responsibility (General Chat) - fond, Jun 19, 09:31:47
- Fancy that! (General Chat) - SCC 28, Jun 19, 09:34:44
- fine then kindly explain why you leap to conclusion its a terrorist incident (General Chat) - fond, Jun 19, 09:41:37
- Stating the obvious isn't a leap (General Chat) - SCC 28, Jun 19, 09:55:10
- I suggest you familiarise yourself with the distinction between hate crime and terrorism (n/m) (General Chat) - fond, Jun 19, 10:02:42
- Oh yes of course (General Chat) - SCC 28, Jun 19, 10:17:22
- is that really the best you can do? (n/m) (General Chat) - fond, Jun 19, 10:21:25
- he is spot on though (General Chat) - CWC, Jun 19, 12:22:46
- Sounds as if that's exactly what you're suggesting (n/m) (General Chat) - Dandy Highburyman, Jun 19, 11:13:50
- is that really the best you can do? (n/m) (General Chat) - fond, Jun 19, 10:21:25
- Oh yes of course (General Chat) - SCC 28, Jun 19, 10:17:22
- at least be consistent (General Chat) - fond, Jun 19, 09:58:19
- Eh? (General Chat) - SCC 28, Jun 19, 10:10:55
- ROFL (General Chat) - fond, Jun 19, 10:17:19
- *PC KLAXON* (n/m) (General Chat) - norway, Jun 19, 10:18:32
- ROFL (General Chat) - fond, Jun 19, 10:17:19
- Eh? (General Chat) - SCC 28, Jun 19, 10:10:55
- I suggest you familiarise yourself with the distinction between hate crime and terrorism (n/m) (General Chat) - fond, Jun 19, 10:02:42
- Stating the obvious isn't a leap (General Chat) - SCC 28, Jun 19, 09:55:10
- fine then kindly explain why you leap to conclusion its a terrorist incident (General Chat) - fond, Jun 19, 09:41:37
- Fancy that! (General Chat) - SCC 28, Jun 19, 09:34:44
- ISIS claimed responsibility (General Chat) - fond, Jun 19, 09:31:47
- LOL any evidence? (General Chat) - SCC 28, Jun 19, 09:28:50
- so called ISIS (n/m) (General Chat) - fond, Jun 19, 09:25:51
- he doesn't have to be a member of a particular organisation to be a terrorist (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, Jun 19, 09:45:25
- I suspect the word terrorist will soon get hijacked by the PC mob (n/m) (General Chat) - Gob on a Stick, Jun 19, 07:34:41
- Well I think we've found the answer to the "calling people c*nts" problem on the Wrath (General Chat) - mr carra, Jun 19, 07:58:03
- Not you (General Chat) - Gob on a Stick, Jun 19, 07:47:55
- wow. just wow (n/m) (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, Jun 19, 08:15:51
- An act of terror is one designed to inflict terror. (General Chat) - APB, Jun 19, 08:13:39
- it's not terrorist (General Chat) - paulg, Jun 19, 10:01:08
- Presumably the result would be fear among muslims. (General Chat) - APB, Jun 19, 10:45:30
- Seems to me reasonably likely it was "terrorist" (General Chat) - paulg, Jun 19, 10:52:08
- Presumably the result would be fear among muslims. (General Chat) - APB, Jun 19, 10:45:30
- One persons terror is another persons retaliation? (General Chat) - Tombs, Jun 19, 08:21:16
- I've not ever accused you of telling me what to do, btw. (General Chat) - APB, Jun 19, 10:47:20
- it's not terrorist (General Chat) - paulg, Jun 19, 10:01:08
- why on earth not, because they don't target white Christians? (General Chat) - CWC, Jun 19, 08:12:21
- That can't be right (n/m) (General Chat) - Old Git, Jun 19, 09:22:44
- For example (General Chat) - Old Git, Jun 19, 09:26:43
- i was also wondering what the relevance of the christian's race was (General Chat) - Tombs, Jun 19, 09:38:49
- For example (General Chat) - Old Git, Jun 19, 09:26:43
- That can't be right (n/m) (General Chat) - Old Git, Jun 19, 09:22:44
- What retaliatory incidents? (General Chat) - SCC 28, Jun 19, 07:52:33
- Actually .. you're right and I'll take back my reactionary just woke post (General Chat) - Gob on a Stick, Jun 19, 08:13:53
- ? (n/m) (General Chat) - SCC 28, Jun 19, 07:43:29
- which terrorist organisation was it? (n/m) (General Chat) - fond, Jun 19, 09:19:42
- Cunts (n/m) (General Chat) - CROYDONCANARY, Jun 19, 01:51:27
- On behalf of all white men, I apologise for the dickhead who did it. (General Chat) - bird table, Jun 19, 09:36:01
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.