I was at the game yes. We had chances.

We always will with the attacking players we have. But we never had the same level of control of proceedings as we did against Charlton because the Howson/Johnson combo does not control a midfield.

I do think Tetts would have made a difference because having him sitting in front of the back 4 gives other players even more freedom to roam and attack, especially Wes.

Anyway we can never prove it so we will have to see what Adams does in future. Against Fulham I hope he goes back to 4-2-3-1 and plays both Tettey and Johnson as the 2.

Posted By: Jim on October 7th 2014 at 19:02:00

Message Thread

Just for the avoidance of doubt the Tettmeister was not injured/rested (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 7, 16:16:05
- Still wouldn't have won the game if he played. (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Oct 7, 17:10:58
  - Neither of us can know if that is the case (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 7, 17:28:59
    - Well if we had dominated the midfield more we may have had even more chances (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 7, 18:06:23
      - Were you at the game? (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Oct 7, 18:23:34
        
        I was at the game yes. We had chances. (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 7, 19:02:00
    - Yeah but it's highly unlikely he would have turned 1 point into 3 (n/m) (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Oct 7, 17:36:44
- My thought is... (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Oct 7, 17:09:22
- You often use the word "worry" in your analysis of Norwich City. (NCFC) - Jim Nasium, Oct 7, 16:39:03
  - blimey that would make 99% of the posts on here pointless then (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Oct 7, 17:02:24
  - What a silly post (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 7, 16:59:53
    - Says the man (NCFC) - Jim Nasium, Oct 7, 17:13:52
  - It is a figure of speech yes, I don;t worry about it constantly (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 7, 16:50:21
    - As do we all Jim. (NCFC) - Jim Nasium, Oct 7, 17:03:52
      - But he was not rested. Adams has made it clear he wasn't. (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 7, 17:27:26
        
        what does Adams say that implies it was a dodgy decision? Seemed to me he just explained (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Oct 7, 17:42:46
        
        Sorry I will rephrase. (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 7, 18:11:02
        
        maybe he just fancied BJ more for that one (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Oct 7, 19:18:21
        
        to be fair to Jim (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Oct 7, 19:24:37
        
        of course, totally valid (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Oct 7, 19:27:27
- Howson is good... but Tettey has been epic this season so far. (NCFC) - Bungle, Oct 7, 16:36:27
  - Agreed (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 7, 17:00:10
- I wouldn't worry about it if I were you. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Oct 7, 16:36:23
  - But I do Lee, I can;t help it. (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 7, 16:38:19
- Question (NCFC) - bullsch, Oct 7, 16:34:53
  - Ha ha, I thought exactly that! (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 7, 17:00:52
  - I thought the same (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 7, 16:37:02
    - Ironically, BJ gets forward, and has the goals to prove it. (n/m) (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Oct 7, 16:39:27

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.