My thought is...

As soon as Tettey went off v Charlton the team let in a goal because the Charlton player was allowed so much time and space. Tettey would likely have stopped that. Tettey also allows the more creative players to get forwards.

BJ actually has more vision going forwards than Howson it's just that he lacks the ability to match his vision. When he wins the ball it often goes straight back to the opposition.

Howson isn't good at creating chances and he is rubbish at closing down and winning the ball, so what is the point of him?

I would like to see O'Neil or Odjidja-Ofoe given a chance alongside Tettey.

Posted By: Larry Hagman on October 7th 2014 at 17:09:22

Message Thread

Just for the avoidance of doubt the Tettmeister was not injured/rested (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 7, 16:16:05
- Still wouldn't have won the game if he played. (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Oct 7, 17:10:58
  - Neither of us can know if that is the case (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 7, 17:28:59
    - Well if we had dominated the midfield more we may have had even more chances (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 7, 18:06:23
      - Were you at the game? (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Oct 7, 18:23:34
        
        I was at the game yes. We had chances. (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 7, 19:02:00
    - Yeah but it's highly unlikely he would have turned 1 point into 3 (n/m) (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Oct 7, 17:36:44
- My thought is... (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Oct 7, 17:09:22
- You often use the word "worry" in your analysis of Norwich City. (NCFC) - Jim Nasium, Oct 7, 16:39:03
  - blimey that would make 99% of the posts on here pointless then (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Oct 7, 17:02:24
  - What a silly post (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 7, 16:59:53
    - Says the man (NCFC) - Jim Nasium, Oct 7, 17:13:52
  - It is a figure of speech yes, I don;t worry about it constantly (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 7, 16:50:21
    - As do we all Jim. (NCFC) - Jim Nasium, Oct 7, 17:03:52
      - But he was not rested. Adams has made it clear he wasn't. (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 7, 17:27:26
        
        what does Adams say that implies it was a dodgy decision? Seemed to me he just explained (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Oct 7, 17:42:46
        
        Sorry I will rephrase. (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 7, 18:11:02
        
        maybe he just fancied BJ more for that one (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Oct 7, 19:18:21
        
        to be fair to Jim (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Oct 7, 19:24:37
        
        of course, totally valid (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Oct 7, 19:27:27
- Howson is good... but Tettey has been epic this season so far. (NCFC) - Bungle, Oct 7, 16:36:27
  - Agreed (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 7, 17:00:10
- I wouldn't worry about it if I were you. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Oct 7, 16:36:23
  - But I do Lee, I can;t help it. (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 7, 16:38:19
- Question (NCFC) - bullsch, Oct 7, 16:34:53
  - Ha ha, I thought exactly that! (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 7, 17:00:52
  - I thought the same (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 7, 16:37:02
    - Ironically, BJ gets forward, and has the goals to prove it. (n/m) (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Oct 7, 16:39:27

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.