what does Adams say that implies it was a dodgy decision? Seemed to me he just explained
that Tettey wasn't injured, and that Howsoon was picked ahead of him. Admittedly, the dropped/not dropped thing is a bit opaque, but he doesn't seem as if he's defensive about the decision. To be fair, it probably wouldn't have had any effect on the result of that game if he'd chosen Tettey ahead of Howson. And it's unlikely he'd drop BJ because he's got a few goals where Tettey hasn't.
Posted By: Higher Wrather on October 7th 2014 at 17:42:46
Message Thread
- Just for the avoidance of doubt the Tettmeister was not injured/rested (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 7, 16:16:05
- Still wouldn't have won the game if he played. (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Oct 7, 17:10:58
- Neither of us can know if that is the case (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 7, 17:28:59
- Well if we had dominated the midfield more we may have had even more chances (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 7, 18:06:23
- Were you at the game? (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Oct 7, 18:23:34
- I was at the game yes. We had chances. (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 7, 19:02:00
- Were you at the game? (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Oct 7, 18:23:34
- Yeah but it's highly unlikely he would have turned 1 point into 3 (n/m) (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Oct 7, 17:36:44
- Well if we had dominated the midfield more we may have had even more chances (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 7, 18:06:23
- Neither of us can know if that is the case (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 7, 17:28:59
- My thought is... (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Oct 7, 17:09:22
- You often use the word "worry" in your analysis of Norwich City. (NCFC) - Jim Nasium, Oct 7, 16:39:03
- blimey that would make 99% of the posts on here pointless then (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Oct 7, 17:02:24
- What a silly post (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 7, 16:59:53
- Says the man (NCFC) - Jim Nasium, Oct 7, 17:13:52
- It is a figure of speech yes, I don;t worry about it constantly (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 7, 16:50:21
- As do we all Jim. (NCFC) - Jim Nasium, Oct 7, 17:03:52
- But he was not rested. Adams has made it clear he wasn't. (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 7, 17:27:26
- what does Adams say that implies it was a dodgy decision? Seemed to me he just explained (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Oct 7, 17:42:46
- Sorry I will rephrase. (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 7, 18:11:02
- maybe he just fancied BJ more for that one (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Oct 7, 19:18:21
- to be fair to Jim (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Oct 7, 19:24:37
- of course, totally valid (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Oct 7, 19:27:27
- to be fair to Jim (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Oct 7, 19:24:37
- maybe he just fancied BJ more for that one (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Oct 7, 19:18:21
- Sorry I will rephrase. (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 7, 18:11:02
- what does Adams say that implies it was a dodgy decision? Seemed to me he just explained (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Oct 7, 17:42:46
- But he was not rested. Adams has made it clear he wasn't. (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 7, 17:27:26
- As do we all Jim. (NCFC) - Jim Nasium, Oct 7, 17:03:52
- Howson is good... but Tettey has been epic this season so far. (NCFC) - Bungle, Oct 7, 16:36:27
- I wouldn't worry about it if I were you. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Oct 7, 16:36:23
- But I do Lee, I can;t help it. (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 7, 16:38:19
- Question (NCFC) - bullsch, Oct 7, 16:34:53
- Ha ha, I thought exactly that! (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 7, 17:00:52
- I thought the same (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 7, 16:37:02
- Ironically, BJ gets forward, and has the goals to prove it. (n/m) (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Oct 7, 16:39:27
- Still wouldn't have won the game if he played. (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Oct 7, 17:10:58
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.