But he was not rested. Adams has made it clear he wasn't.
Your post would imply that we can never question the team selection. I disagree. Being a fan and posting on here is all about posting our opinions. I don't "know" anything but my opinion was already that it was a dodgy decision and the quotes from Adams himself appear to confirm it.
Posted By: Jim on October 7th 2014 at 17:27:26
Message Thread
- Just for the avoidance of doubt the Tettmeister was not injured/rested (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 7, 16:16:05
- Still wouldn't have won the game if he played. (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Oct 7, 17:10:58
- Neither of us can know if that is the case (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 7, 17:28:59
- Well if we had dominated the midfield more we may have had even more chances (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 7, 18:06:23
- Were you at the game? (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Oct 7, 18:23:34
- I was at the game yes. We had chances. (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 7, 19:02:00
- Were you at the game? (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Oct 7, 18:23:34
- Yeah but it's highly unlikely he would have turned 1 point into 3 (n/m) (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Oct 7, 17:36:44
- Well if we had dominated the midfield more we may have had even more chances (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 7, 18:06:23
- Neither of us can know if that is the case (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 7, 17:28:59
- My thought is... (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Oct 7, 17:09:22
- You often use the word "worry" in your analysis of Norwich City. (NCFC) - Jim Nasium, Oct 7, 16:39:03
- blimey that would make 99% of the posts on here pointless then (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Oct 7, 17:02:24
- What a silly post (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 7, 16:59:53
- Says the man (NCFC) - Jim Nasium, Oct 7, 17:13:52
- It is a figure of speech yes, I don;t worry about it constantly (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 7, 16:50:21
- As do we all Jim. (NCFC) - Jim Nasium, Oct 7, 17:03:52
- But he was not rested. Adams has made it clear he wasn't. (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 7, 17:27:26
- what does Adams say that implies it was a dodgy decision? Seemed to me he just explained (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Oct 7, 17:42:46
- Sorry I will rephrase. (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 7, 18:11:02
- maybe he just fancied BJ more for that one (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Oct 7, 19:18:21
- to be fair to Jim (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Oct 7, 19:24:37
- of course, totally valid (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Oct 7, 19:27:27
- to be fair to Jim (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Oct 7, 19:24:37
- maybe he just fancied BJ more for that one (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Oct 7, 19:18:21
- Sorry I will rephrase. (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 7, 18:11:02
- what does Adams say that implies it was a dodgy decision? Seemed to me he just explained (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Oct 7, 17:42:46
- But he was not rested. Adams has made it clear he wasn't. (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 7, 17:27:26
- As do we all Jim. (NCFC) - Jim Nasium, Oct 7, 17:03:52
- Howson is good... but Tettey has been epic this season so far. (NCFC) - Bungle, Oct 7, 16:36:27
- I wouldn't worry about it if I were you. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Oct 7, 16:36:23
- But I do Lee, I can;t help it. (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 7, 16:38:19
- Question (NCFC) - bullsch, Oct 7, 16:34:53
- Ha ha, I thought exactly that! (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 7, 17:00:52
- I thought the same (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 7, 16:37:02
- Ironically, BJ gets forward, and has the goals to prove it. (n/m) (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Oct 7, 16:39:27
- Still wouldn't have won the game if he played. (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Oct 7, 17:10:58
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.