We also know why we are so indebted fro previous accounts.

And you can't blame the entire current board for it.

Also the "Jayson Blair" argument of how come teams with a smaller crowd/turnover than us are better than us is very facile. Teams do well due to a great deal of factors, how the team is managed, how and where the money spent etc etc. Otherwise Man City would have won the Premier League as they spent the most. I agree that in time cash rises to the top, but because we so monumentally f**ked up our finances, we ain't got any. We had a large wage bill going on s**t players, not a smaller one going on decent players like other clubs.

I don't think anyone ever thought that a new manager every year was the answer. They thought, this manager isn't good enough and we need a better one, but kep making the wrong appointments, seemingly until now.

Likewise certain members of the old board were inept, I think so far, McNally Bowkett have demonstrated they are not inept, possibly the opposite, we finally have people in charge who can get us going in the right direction.

Hindsight is a wonderful thing and who knows we may look back on the appointment of McNally as the worst thing in our history.

I somehow doubt it though.

Posted By: jafski on June 7th 2010 at 13:15:05

Message Thread

What are everyone's thoughts on the signings so far? (NCFC) - jafski, Jun 7, 11:25:14
- WE WILL WIN (n/m) (NCFC) - fareastcanary, Jun 7, 19:14:50
- meh. (n/m) (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Jun 7, 12:06:10
- Overall going mostly by fans opinions of the Clubs they have left to join us (NCFC) - lovely old job, Jun 7, 11:37:31
  - Re: Foxy (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, Jun 7, 11:45:08
    - Mulryne was excellent until Dailly broke his leg, after that he lost the little pace he (NCFC) - lovely old job, Jun 7, 11:46:07
      - Yes. My point is, though, is that Fox is attributed to have all the same skills Mulryne ha (n/m) (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, Jun 7, 11:47:02
        
        d (n/m) (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, Jun 7, 11:47:12
  - Crofts, I forgot about him! Too many signings, everyone should be on holiday. (n/m) (NCFC) - jafski, Jun 7, 11:41:37
- I don't expect too many cash signings (NCFC) - pants, Jun 7, 11:36:55
  - I wouldn't get hung up on the big screen thing too much, I think it was a bit of a throw (NCFC) - jafski, Jun 7, 11:48:36
  - Our board has only been in place for a year. (NCFC) - lurd, Jun 7, 11:40:56
    - Meet the board (NCFC) - pants, Jun 7, 12:09:51
      - For 3 of the 6, including the Chairman and Chief Exec, it's less than year, isn't it? (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jun 7, 12:14:10
        
        Whether or not it's more or less than a year, this is in SUBSTANCE a very new board (NCFC) - Old Git, Jun 7, 12:22:21
        
        Yes, so whilst soe of the current board have been on the board for longer, this board has (NCFC) - jafski, Jun 7, 12:20:30
        
        I think plenty of alarm bells went off (NCFC) - pants, Jun 7, 12:53:58
        
        How do you know it cost us that? Was it us or the promoter? I don't know how it works so I (NCFC) - jafski, Jun 7, 13:01:57
        
        We also know why we are so indebted fro previous accounts. (NCFC) - jafski, Jun 7, 13:15:05
        
        Isn't a lot of this conjecture though? (NCFC) - pants, Jun 7, 14:23:48
        
        No you misunderstand my point. I was talking about prior to now. (NCFC) - jafski, Jun 7, 14:40:06
        
        good post, I agree (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jun 7, 13:39:40
        
        Erm, I'm guessing cos we cancelled it (NCFC) - pants, Jun 7, 13:11:39
        
        Did we cancel it? (n/m) (NCFC) - jafski, Jun 7, 13:15:20
        
        Yeah, cos we want to put the 1100 more seats in (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jun 7, 13:16:45
        
        We cancelled it, or the promoter due to lack of interest and that was the story put out to (NCFC) - jafski, Jun 7, 13:21:02
        
        I haven't seen any official stories about lack of interest (NCFC) - pants, Jun 7, 13:35:18
        
        OH JUST FUCK OFF (n/m) (NCFC) - lurd, Jun 7, 13:43:41
        
        1100 x 22 matches (min) x say ?15 (conservative) = ?363,000 turnover for one season. (NCFC) - jafski, Jun 7, 13:39:37
        
        Yes, I appreciate that (NCFC) - pants, Jun 7, 13:42:19
        
        this is a fair point once it's confirmed we owe somebody some money (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jun 7, 13:48:12
        
        Tru dat. But commercially, if it became obvious that Tom wasn't going to sell out it may (NCFC) - jafski, Jun 7, 13:47:49
        
        The guy is worth about ?200m (NCFC) - pants, Jun 7, 13:23:12
        
        The concert had only sold around 3000 tickets. (NCFC) - lurd, Jun 7, 13:28:55
        
        I've stuck to the facts (NCFC) - pants, Jun 7, 13:39:53
        
        The offical line is that it's "Postponed" (NCFC) - lurd, Jun 7, 13:45:19
        
        It's Not Unusual. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, Jun 7, 13:47:56
        
        Are we reverting back to rational debate now? (NCFC) - pants, Jun 7, 13:47:39
        
        I'll tell you what, if you promise not to mention this until it's confirmed (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jun 7, 13:50:24
        
        Nah, it's fine, it will come out eventually (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jun 7, 13:53:41
        
        They probably wighed up any cost and looked at it against revenue from seats and decided (NCFC) - jafski, Jun 7, 13:30:26
        
        But he hadn't had he? Sales were going badly weren't they? (n/m) (NCFC) - jafski, Jun 7, 13:27:17
        
        Yes but was it us or the promoter? (NCFC) - lurd, Jun 7, 13:20:11
        
        Their will have been consquences to postponing it (NCFC) - pants, Jun 7, 13:21:58
        
        The promoter hires the ground. (NCFC) - lurd, Jun 7, 13:08:11
        
        oooooooooooo missus (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Jun 7, 12:22:40
        
        Oooh you are awful... (n/m) (NCFC) - jafski, Jun 7, 12:24:29
        
        ........ (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Jun 7, 12:27:33
        
        McNasty could give me a new feel any time he wanted (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Jun 7, 12:26:25
        
        He could massage my double entry to elicit a dividend anytime he wanted. (n/m) (NCFC) - jafski, Jun 7, 12:31:04
        
        He could slide into my seat without a season ticket (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Jun 7, 12:42:19
        
        He could value my assets and strip out anything required (n/m) (NCFC) - camcan, Jun 7, 12:46:24
        
        He could budg-et in many different ways (n/m) (NCFC) - camcan, Jun 7, 12:48:37
        
        He could make an unauthorised approach for my prized assets (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Jun 7, 13:00:24
        
        He could orally discipline my staff member. (n/m) (NCFC) - jafski, Jun 7, 13:03:35
        
        He could do a 360' appraisal and work out some issues (n/m) (NCFC) - camcan, Jun 7, 13:08:53
        
        ? (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jun 7, 13:55:58
        
        couldn't be arsed (n/m) (NCFC) - camcan, Jun 7, 14:02:52
  - "froogle" (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jun 7, 11:39:53
    - ahem (NCFC) - pants, Jun 7, 11:49:35
- I know what you mean.. (NCFC) - loz, Jun 7, 11:35:13
  - Re Cody (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, Jun 7, 11:38:11
    - a loan would be good.. (NCFC) - loz, Jun 7, 11:43:11
- Think Lambert is going to go defensive TBH (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jun 7, 11:31:42
  - If Rusty is off we need another destructive player in there unless Smithy is going to sit. (n/m) (NCFC) - jafski, Jun 7, 11:34:11
    - Personally think Smith is great at that role (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jun 7, 11:35:46
      - We need an alternative though. (n/m) (NCFC) - jafski, Jun 7, 11:38:52

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.