McNasty could give me a new feel any time he wanted

Posted By: Old Git on June 7th 2010 at 12:26:25

Message Thread

What are everyone's thoughts on the signings so far? (NCFC) - jafski, Jun 7, 11:25:14
- WE WILL WIN (n/m) (NCFC) - fareastcanary, Jun 7, 19:14:50
- meh. (n/m) (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Jun 7, 12:06:10
- Overall going mostly by fans opinions of the Clubs they have left to join us (NCFC) - lovely old job, Jun 7, 11:37:31
  - Re: Foxy (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, Jun 7, 11:45:08
    - Mulryne was excellent until Dailly broke his leg, after that he lost the little pace he (NCFC) - lovely old job, Jun 7, 11:46:07
      - Yes. My point is, though, is that Fox is attributed to have all the same skills Mulryne ha (n/m) (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, Jun 7, 11:47:02
        
        d (n/m) (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, Jun 7, 11:47:12
  - Crofts, I forgot about him! Too many signings, everyone should be on holiday. (n/m) (NCFC) - jafski, Jun 7, 11:41:37
- I don't expect too many cash signings (NCFC) - pants, Jun 7, 11:36:55
  - I wouldn't get hung up on the big screen thing too much, I think it was a bit of a throw (NCFC) - jafski, Jun 7, 11:48:36
  - Our board has only been in place for a year. (NCFC) - lurd, Jun 7, 11:40:56
    - Meet the board (NCFC) - pants, Jun 7, 12:09:51
      - For 3 of the 6, including the Chairman and Chief Exec, it's less than year, isn't it? (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jun 7, 12:14:10
        
        Whether or not it's more or less than a year, this is in SUBSTANCE a very new board (NCFC) - Old Git, Jun 7, 12:22:21
        
        Yes, so whilst soe of the current board have been on the board for longer, this board has (NCFC) - jafski, Jun 7, 12:20:30
        
        I think plenty of alarm bells went off (NCFC) - pants, Jun 7, 12:53:58
        
        How do you know it cost us that? Was it us or the promoter? I don't know how it works so I (NCFC) - jafski, Jun 7, 13:01:57
        
        We also know why we are so indebted fro previous accounts. (NCFC) - jafski, Jun 7, 13:15:05
        
        Isn't a lot of this conjecture though? (NCFC) - pants, Jun 7, 14:23:48
        
        No you misunderstand my point. I was talking about prior to now. (NCFC) - jafski, Jun 7, 14:40:06
        
        good post, I agree (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jun 7, 13:39:40
        
        Erm, I'm guessing cos we cancelled it (NCFC) - pants, Jun 7, 13:11:39
        
        Did we cancel it? (n/m) (NCFC) - jafski, Jun 7, 13:15:20
        
        Yeah, cos we want to put the 1100 more seats in (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jun 7, 13:16:45
        
        We cancelled it, or the promoter due to lack of interest and that was the story put out to (NCFC) - jafski, Jun 7, 13:21:02
        
        I haven't seen any official stories about lack of interest (NCFC) - pants, Jun 7, 13:35:18
        
        OH JUST FUCK OFF (n/m) (NCFC) - lurd, Jun 7, 13:43:41
        
        1100 x 22 matches (min) x say ?15 (conservative) = ?363,000 turnover for one season. (NCFC) - jafski, Jun 7, 13:39:37
        
        Yes, I appreciate that (NCFC) - pants, Jun 7, 13:42:19
        
        this is a fair point once it's confirmed we owe somebody some money (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jun 7, 13:48:12
        
        Tru dat. But commercially, if it became obvious that Tom wasn't going to sell out it may (NCFC) - jafski, Jun 7, 13:47:49
        
        The guy is worth about ?200m (NCFC) - pants, Jun 7, 13:23:12
        
        The concert had only sold around 3000 tickets. (NCFC) - lurd, Jun 7, 13:28:55
        
        I've stuck to the facts (NCFC) - pants, Jun 7, 13:39:53
        
        The offical line is that it's "Postponed" (NCFC) - lurd, Jun 7, 13:45:19
        
        It's Not Unusual. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, Jun 7, 13:47:56
        
        Are we reverting back to rational debate now? (NCFC) - pants, Jun 7, 13:47:39
        
        I'll tell you what, if you promise not to mention this until it's confirmed (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jun 7, 13:50:24
        
        Nah, it's fine, it will come out eventually (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jun 7, 13:53:41
        
        They probably wighed up any cost and looked at it against revenue from seats and decided (NCFC) - jafski, Jun 7, 13:30:26
        
        But he hadn't had he? Sales were going badly weren't they? (n/m) (NCFC) - jafski, Jun 7, 13:27:17
        
        Yes but was it us or the promoter? (NCFC) - lurd, Jun 7, 13:20:11
        
        Their will have been consquences to postponing it (NCFC) - pants, Jun 7, 13:21:58
        
        The promoter hires the ground. (NCFC) - lurd, Jun 7, 13:08:11
        
        oooooooooooo missus (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Jun 7, 12:22:40
        
        Oooh you are awful... (n/m) (NCFC) - jafski, Jun 7, 12:24:29
        
        ........ (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Jun 7, 12:27:33
        
        McNasty could give me a new feel any time he wanted (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Jun 7, 12:26:25
        
        He could massage my double entry to elicit a dividend anytime he wanted. (n/m) (NCFC) - jafski, Jun 7, 12:31:04
        
        He could slide into my seat without a season ticket (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Jun 7, 12:42:19
        
        He could value my assets and strip out anything required (n/m) (NCFC) - camcan, Jun 7, 12:46:24
        
        He could budg-et in many different ways (n/m) (NCFC) - camcan, Jun 7, 12:48:37
        
        He could make an unauthorised approach for my prized assets (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Jun 7, 13:00:24
        
        He could orally discipline my staff member. (n/m) (NCFC) - jafski, Jun 7, 13:03:35
        
        He could do a 360' appraisal and work out some issues (n/m) (NCFC) - camcan, Jun 7, 13:08:53
        
        ? (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jun 7, 13:55:58
        
        couldn't be arsed (n/m) (NCFC) - camcan, Jun 7, 14:02:52
  - "froogle" (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jun 7, 11:39:53
    - ahem (NCFC) - pants, Jun 7, 11:49:35
- I know what you mean.. (NCFC) - loz, Jun 7, 11:35:13
  - Re Cody (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, Jun 7, 11:38:11
    - a loan would be good.. (NCFC) - loz, Jun 7, 11:43:11
- Think Lambert is going to go defensive TBH (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jun 7, 11:31:42
  - If Rusty is off we need another destructive player in there unless Smithy is going to sit. (n/m) (NCFC) - jafski, Jun 7, 11:34:11
    - Personally think Smith is great at that role (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jun 7, 11:35:46
      - We need an alternative though. (n/m) (NCFC) - jafski, Jun 7, 11:38:52

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.