I'm not sure your analysis is correct about Roeder
Personally I think we would have gone down if he'd stayed; we were just getting worse and worse. That we went down anyway doesn't really change that.
But I think you're half right - the board seems to be s**t scared of appearing to not listen to the fans lest they appear out of touch. Hanging on way too long with Worthy might also have made them trigger happy since. That said, I really can't argue with the sacking of Roeder (or Grant for that matter)
I fear for next season though. My expectations are that we'll struggle from the off and we might take years to rebuild; but seems to me that a substantial proportion think we're going to walk it because "we're too big for L1" and we'll continue to chuck big sums of money (that we can ill afford) at crap players instead of rebuilding. I don't think Gunn's the man for either job really so I expect sometime before Christmas there will be calls for him to be sacked. And the worst thing? They'll probably be right...
Posted By: BerlinCanary on June 4th 2009 at 13:59:29
Message Thread
- Might be WW2 - just seen we are back in the ressies league next season (NCFC) - KentonCanary, Jun 4, 10:17:58
- Part of the Roeder Revolution (NCFC) - Cart Gap Disco, Jun 4, 10:22:31
- Those sacked hardly won academy awards either (NCFC) - pants, Jun 4, 10:48:03
- Is that why people fall out with you? (NCFC) - Cart Gap Disco, Jun 4, 11:07:13
- I'll never understand the vitriolic way we purge managers out (NCFC) - pants, Jun 4, 11:11:16
- I welcomed Roeders attempt to reform the club assuming that (NCFC) - Cart Gap Disco, Jun 4, 11:27:19
- I guess, and I might have agreed but (NCFC) - pants, Jun 4, 11:32:24
- Fair enough... (NCFC) - Cart Gap Disco, Jun 4, 11:41:53
- This is what I liked (NCFC) - pants, Jun 4, 12:00:38
- I agree regarding Gunn (NCFC) - Charles21, Jun 4, 11:53:43
- Yeah it is potentially as catastrophic as Grant (NCFC) - Cart Gap Disco, Jun 4, 11:59:22
- I agree with that in hindsight (NCFC) - pants, Jun 4, 12:25:39
- it's difficult though (NCFC) - Charles21, Jun 4, 12:01:07
- I agree and fans are much less patient than they used to be (NCFC) - Cart Gap Disco, Jun 4, 12:05:08
- Yeah it is potentially as catastrophic as Grant (NCFC) - Cart Gap Disco, Jun 4, 11:59:22
- Fair enough... (NCFC) - Cart Gap Disco, Jun 4, 11:41:53
- I guess, and I might have agreed but (NCFC) - pants, Jun 4, 11:32:24
- I'll never understand the vitriol managers pour in the fans' direction (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Jun 4, 11:14:29
- Oh come off it (NCFC) - Charles21, Jun 4, 11:16:57
- I was trolling (NCFC) - duke of york, Jun 4, 11:18:18
- Oh come off it (NCFC) - Charles21, Jun 4, 11:16:57
- The answer would be for the board to appoint the right man in the first place. (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Jun 4, 11:14:26
- oh dear (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jun 4, 11:17:43
- Whats the matter? Small chunk of poo just run down your leg? (n/m) (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Jun 4, 11:21:32
- perhaps, but if it did it came from your mouth (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jun 4, 11:22:49
- Thats the most hypocritical post ever considering you talk more shit (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Jun 4, 11:24:01
- what one posts on other subjects is not relevant here (NCFC) - Charles21, Jun 4, 11:26:02
- Point proven - Thank you (n/m) (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Jun 4, 11:27:48
- what one posts on other subjects is not relevant here (NCFC) - Charles21, Jun 4, 11:26:02
- Thats the most hypocritical post ever considering you talk more shit (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Jun 4, 11:24:01
- perhaps, but if it did it came from your mouth (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jun 4, 11:22:49
- Whats the matter? Small chunk of poo just run down your leg? (n/m) (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Jun 4, 11:21:32
- oh dear (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jun 4, 11:17:43
- I welcomed Roeders attempt to reform the club assuming that (NCFC) - Cart Gap Disco, Jun 4, 11:27:19
- I'll never understand the vitriolic way we purge managers out (NCFC) - pants, Jun 4, 11:11:16
- ... (NCFC) - Tombs, Jun 4, 11:05:11
- Time to move on i feel (NCFC) - HoofinHughes, Jun 4, 10:55:48
- which loan players couldn't play? (NCFC) - Charles21, Jun 4, 10:54:48
- could Jonathan Grounds play? (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Jun 4, 11:06:02
- He wasn't playing vs Charlton (NCFC) - Charles21, Jun 4, 11:09:32
- And the morale of the story is............... (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Jun 4, 11:04:53
- except one knew how to keep us in this division (NCFC) - pants, Jun 4, 11:12:26
- I think you've forgotten the run of form (NCFC) - duke of york, Jun 4, 11:15:23
- Is that time machine available on freeware? (NCFC) - pants, Jun 4, 11:17:35
- Well, we were weren't we? (NCFC) - duke of york, Jun 4, 11:18:59
- When the basis of a point of view stems from knowing the future (NCFC) - pants, Jun 4, 11:23:07
- isn't your entire reasoning "roeder would have kept us up" (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jun 4, 11:24:48
- 10 words 1 lie (NCFC) - pants, Jun 4, 11:41:09
- So you don't think Roeder would have kept us up? (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Jun 4, 12:37:38
- I don't know do I? (NCFC) - pants, Jun 4, 13:41:28
- I'm not sure your analysis is correct about Roeder (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Jun 4, 13:59:29
- I do think that if we hadn't lost Hooly and Crofty (NCFC) - duke of york, Jun 4, 13:44:44
- losing them to was a massive blow (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jun 4, 13:48:21
- I don't know do I? (NCFC) - pants, Jun 4, 13:41:28
- I'm glad to hear it ends here (NCFC) - Charles21, Jun 4, 11:46:53
- You chucked in one mooohasive assumption (NCFC) - pants, Jun 4, 12:03:11
- ok, lets forget it then (NCFC) - Charles21, Jun 4, 12:08:12
- fair enough (NCFC) - pants, Jun 4, 12:22:45
- look it's fine (NCFC) - Charles21, Jun 4, 12:46:06
- cool, we'll see (NCFC) - pants, Jun 4, 13:34:30
- look it's fine (NCFC) - Charles21, Jun 4, 12:46:06
- fair enough (NCFC) - pants, Jun 4, 12:22:45
- ok, lets forget it then (NCFC) - Charles21, Jun 4, 12:08:12
- You chucked in one mooohasive assumption (NCFC) - pants, Jun 4, 12:03:11
- So you don't think Roeder would have kept us up? (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Jun 4, 12:37:38
- 10 words 1 lie (NCFC) - pants, Jun 4, 11:41:09
- isn't your entire reasoning "roeder would have kept us up" (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jun 4, 11:24:48
- here's the table... (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Jun 4, 11:19:56
- When the basis of a point of view stems from knowing the future (NCFC) - pants, Jun 4, 11:23:07
- Well, we were weren't we? (NCFC) - duke of york, Jun 4, 11:18:59
- Is that time machine available on freeware? (NCFC) - pants, Jun 4, 11:17:35
- Is that the on ewho has a hadbit of keeping them up one year and taking tehm down the next (n/m) (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Jun 4, 11:15:08
- *Really should proof read!! lol (n/m) (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Jun 4, 11:15:24
- I think you've forgotten the run of form (NCFC) - duke of york, Jun 4, 11:15:23
- moral (NCFC) - Tombs, Jun 4, 11:07:25
- Thanks PC. Promotion to inspector if you keep this up!!! (n/m) (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Jun 4, 11:09:57
- just doing my job sir (NCFC) - Tombs, Jun 4, 11:11:19
- lol (n/m) (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Jun 4, 11:11:36
- just doing my job sir (NCFC) - Tombs, Jun 4, 11:11:19
- Thanks PC. Promotion to inspector if you keep this up!!! (n/m) (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Jun 4, 11:09:57
- except one knew how to keep us in this division (NCFC) - pants, Jun 4, 11:12:26
- could Jonathan Grounds play? (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Jun 4, 11:06:02
- Is that why people fall out with you? (NCFC) - Cart Gap Disco, Jun 4, 11:07:13
- Those sacked hardly won academy awards either (NCFC) - pants, Jun 4, 10:48:03
- Part of the Roeder Revolution (NCFC) - Cart Gap Disco, Jun 4, 10:22:31
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.