fair enough
The only reason I block out you and others, is because of the above, you rashly package up my point of view as a solid "that's what he thinks" and then you run with it
It's not just you, but then, it's not just you who I avoid replying to because of this
That gets taken to the next level that I cannot reason with people, so I go off in a huff. That's not the case in the slightest
Yes I'm stubborn, yes I have my viewpoint that I think is mine, but I don't run off with other peoples opinion and mock it. I just give out mine and try to expand on it
If you and others translate it into something to mock, then I back away from trying to reason with you and others
I've explained this many times to various users, but they still do it (you still do it)
I have nothing immensely personal over it, it's just a working solution, as I've tried over a number of years to reason round it, and it only spirals into groups going "yeah but this is pants" or "what he means is" etc etc
I find it a shame that run with scc to the point of if going round in circles, and I find it a shame that I'm just pigeoned holed as "is this why you end up arguing with people on here"
I don't, I just have an opinion, one that others regularly like to batten down or belittle. When I know that's happening, I walk away. When I walk away, it turns into "pants can't be an adult about it"
I translate that over time as trolling, as it's only other users way of saying "come on pants, play the game, you are the jester after all, entertain us"
Posted By: pants on June 4th 2009 at 12:22:45
Message Thread
- Might be WW2 - just seen we are back in the ressies league next season (NCFC) - KentonCanary, Jun 4, 10:17:58
- Part of the Roeder Revolution (NCFC) - Cart Gap Disco, Jun 4, 10:22:31
- Those sacked hardly won academy awards either (NCFC) - pants, Jun 4, 10:48:03
- Is that why people fall out with you? (NCFC) - Cart Gap Disco, Jun 4, 11:07:13
- I'll never understand the vitriolic way we purge managers out (NCFC) - pants, Jun 4, 11:11:16
- I welcomed Roeders attempt to reform the club assuming that (NCFC) - Cart Gap Disco, Jun 4, 11:27:19
- I guess, and I might have agreed but (NCFC) - pants, Jun 4, 11:32:24
- Fair enough... (NCFC) - Cart Gap Disco, Jun 4, 11:41:53
- This is what I liked (NCFC) - pants, Jun 4, 12:00:38
- I agree regarding Gunn (NCFC) - Charles21, Jun 4, 11:53:43
- Yeah it is potentially as catastrophic as Grant (NCFC) - Cart Gap Disco, Jun 4, 11:59:22
- I agree with that in hindsight (NCFC) - pants, Jun 4, 12:25:39
- it's difficult though (NCFC) - Charles21, Jun 4, 12:01:07
- I agree and fans are much less patient than they used to be (NCFC) - Cart Gap Disco, Jun 4, 12:05:08
- Yeah it is potentially as catastrophic as Grant (NCFC) - Cart Gap Disco, Jun 4, 11:59:22
- Fair enough... (NCFC) - Cart Gap Disco, Jun 4, 11:41:53
- I guess, and I might have agreed but (NCFC) - pants, Jun 4, 11:32:24
- I'll never understand the vitriol managers pour in the fans' direction (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Jun 4, 11:14:29
- Oh come off it (NCFC) - Charles21, Jun 4, 11:16:57
- I was trolling (NCFC) - duke of york, Jun 4, 11:18:18
- Oh come off it (NCFC) - Charles21, Jun 4, 11:16:57
- The answer would be for the board to appoint the right man in the first place. (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Jun 4, 11:14:26
- oh dear (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jun 4, 11:17:43
- Whats the matter? Small chunk of poo just run down your leg? (n/m) (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Jun 4, 11:21:32
- perhaps, but if it did it came from your mouth (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jun 4, 11:22:49
- Thats the most hypocritical post ever considering you talk more shit (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Jun 4, 11:24:01
- what one posts on other subjects is not relevant here (NCFC) - Charles21, Jun 4, 11:26:02
- Point proven - Thank you (n/m) (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Jun 4, 11:27:48
- what one posts on other subjects is not relevant here (NCFC) - Charles21, Jun 4, 11:26:02
- Thats the most hypocritical post ever considering you talk more shit (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Jun 4, 11:24:01
- perhaps, but if it did it came from your mouth (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jun 4, 11:22:49
- Whats the matter? Small chunk of poo just run down your leg? (n/m) (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Jun 4, 11:21:32
- oh dear (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jun 4, 11:17:43
- I welcomed Roeders attempt to reform the club assuming that (NCFC) - Cart Gap Disco, Jun 4, 11:27:19
- I'll never understand the vitriolic way we purge managers out (NCFC) - pants, Jun 4, 11:11:16
- ... (NCFC) - Tombs, Jun 4, 11:05:11
- Time to move on i feel (NCFC) - HoofinHughes, Jun 4, 10:55:48
- which loan players couldn't play? (NCFC) - Charles21, Jun 4, 10:54:48
- could Jonathan Grounds play? (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Jun 4, 11:06:02
- He wasn't playing vs Charlton (NCFC) - Charles21, Jun 4, 11:09:32
- And the morale of the story is............... (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Jun 4, 11:04:53
- except one knew how to keep us in this division (NCFC) - pants, Jun 4, 11:12:26
- I think you've forgotten the run of form (NCFC) - duke of york, Jun 4, 11:15:23
- Is that time machine available on freeware? (NCFC) - pants, Jun 4, 11:17:35
- Well, we were weren't we? (NCFC) - duke of york, Jun 4, 11:18:59
- When the basis of a point of view stems from knowing the future (NCFC) - pants, Jun 4, 11:23:07
- isn't your entire reasoning "roeder would have kept us up" (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jun 4, 11:24:48
- 10 words 1 lie (NCFC) - pants, Jun 4, 11:41:09
- So you don't think Roeder would have kept us up? (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Jun 4, 12:37:38
- I don't know do I? (NCFC) - pants, Jun 4, 13:41:28
- I'm not sure your analysis is correct about Roeder (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Jun 4, 13:59:29
- I do think that if we hadn't lost Hooly and Crofty (NCFC) - duke of york, Jun 4, 13:44:44
- losing them to was a massive blow (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jun 4, 13:48:21
- I don't know do I? (NCFC) - pants, Jun 4, 13:41:28
- I'm glad to hear it ends here (NCFC) - Charles21, Jun 4, 11:46:53
- You chucked in one mooohasive assumption (NCFC) - pants, Jun 4, 12:03:11
- ok, lets forget it then (NCFC) - Charles21, Jun 4, 12:08:12
- fair enough (NCFC) - pants, Jun 4, 12:22:45
- look it's fine (NCFC) - Charles21, Jun 4, 12:46:06
- cool, we'll see (NCFC) - pants, Jun 4, 13:34:30
- look it's fine (NCFC) - Charles21, Jun 4, 12:46:06
- fair enough (NCFC) - pants, Jun 4, 12:22:45
- ok, lets forget it then (NCFC) - Charles21, Jun 4, 12:08:12
- You chucked in one mooohasive assumption (NCFC) - pants, Jun 4, 12:03:11
- So you don't think Roeder would have kept us up? (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Jun 4, 12:37:38
- 10 words 1 lie (NCFC) - pants, Jun 4, 11:41:09
- isn't your entire reasoning "roeder would have kept us up" (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jun 4, 11:24:48
- here's the table... (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Jun 4, 11:19:56
- When the basis of a point of view stems from knowing the future (NCFC) - pants, Jun 4, 11:23:07
- Well, we were weren't we? (NCFC) - duke of york, Jun 4, 11:18:59
- Is that time machine available on freeware? (NCFC) - pants, Jun 4, 11:17:35
- Is that the on ewho has a hadbit of keeping them up one year and taking tehm down the next (n/m) (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Jun 4, 11:15:08
- *Really should proof read!! lol (n/m) (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Jun 4, 11:15:24
- I think you've forgotten the run of form (NCFC) - duke of york, Jun 4, 11:15:23
- moral (NCFC) - Tombs, Jun 4, 11:07:25
- Thanks PC. Promotion to inspector if you keep this up!!! (n/m) (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Jun 4, 11:09:57
- just doing my job sir (NCFC) - Tombs, Jun 4, 11:11:19
- lol (n/m) (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Jun 4, 11:11:36
- just doing my job sir (NCFC) - Tombs, Jun 4, 11:11:19
- Thanks PC. Promotion to inspector if you keep this up!!! (n/m) (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Jun 4, 11:09:57
- except one knew how to keep us in this division (NCFC) - pants, Jun 4, 11:12:26
- could Jonathan Grounds play? (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Jun 4, 11:06:02
- Is that why people fall out with you? (NCFC) - Cart Gap Disco, Jun 4, 11:07:13
- Those sacked hardly won academy awards either (NCFC) - pants, Jun 4, 10:48:03
- Part of the Roeder Revolution (NCFC) - Cart Gap Disco, Jun 4, 10:22:31
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.