You mistake me having you on ignore

with me skimming through and ignoring what you're saying

I know the only purpose you have is to set me off, so why would I indulge myself in taking anything you have to say seriously

If you think that's great, and it's all that matters, cool

I only replied to the above, cos you went to the highest level of pompousity to try and get a reaction, cos you're that desperate

Well played, you got it

Posted By: pants on April 21st 2009 at 18:24:19

Message Thread

See Towergate are really f**ked then! (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 21, 13:59:01
- I wouldn't discount him yet (NCFC) - Ben, Apr 21, 14:59:41
- Cullum can go fuck himself, put your money where your mouth is you lip licking cunt (n/m) (NCFC) - stringersrevenge, Apr 21, 14:44:31
  - Yes obviously it was all to get a few cheap column inches in the f**king EDP! (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 21, 14:52:09
    - Show me the money? That should hav (n/m) (NCFC) - stringersrevenge, Apr 21, 14:55:16
      - e been the EDP headline followed by fuck off then you gimp (NCFC) - stringersrevenge, Apr 21, 14:56:30
        
        Timing was not great but what can you do when they won't talk to you! (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 21, 15:10:14
        
        how did they not talk to him? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 21, 15:10:56
        
        because they never f**king met him! (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 21, 15:42:23
        
        I think its was more being talked at, than talking to. (n/m) (NCFC) - megson, Apr 21, 15:13:18
    - agreed (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 21, 14:53:02
      - Enough agreeing already (NCFC) - stringersrevenge, Apr 21, 14:57:43
        
        greed (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 21, 15:01:06
  - agreed (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 21, 14:48:04
- He promised he wouldn't see us go down though (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Apr 21, 14:05:25
  - He's going to shut his eyes (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Apr 21, 14:27:52
  - he said he wouldn't see us go down the tubes (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Apr 21, 14:09:05
- we need to get over this Cullum thing (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 21, 13:59:34
  - Rubbish - he is (and always has been) our main hope (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 21, 14:17:28
  - Err, why? (NCFC) - Old Git, Apr 21, 14:04:25
    - Agree with now, our board have no excuses, if they have the club at heart (NCFC) - pants, Apr 21, 14:07:17
      - Most sensible pants post EVER. (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 21, 14:29:49
      - Wierd, i still feel an instinctive reaction to wade in and defend the club on the Cullum (NCFC) - megson, Apr 21, 14:14:34
        
        Takes two to tango (NCFC) - Old Git, Apr 21, 14:25:57
        
        Its does. (NCFC) - megson, Apr 21, 14:41:55
        
        You ahve to take a risk or two (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 21, 14:51:36
        
        Yep, i can see the sense in that, and like i say, i'd welcome him (NCFC) - megson, Apr 21, 14:55:54
        
        agree with that (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Apr 21, 14:20:23
      - But the point about relegation is that it may well mean the board/Delia won't be ABLE (NCFC) - Old Git, Apr 21, 14:13:22
        
        I feel slightly guilty saying this (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 21, 14:15:46
        
        ego te absolvo (NCFC) - Old Git, Apr 21, 14:27:27
        
        I felt like this the season we sacked Worthington, that it might not (NCFC) - pants, Apr 21, 14:22:59
        
        we should have sacked worthington when we left the prem (NCFC) - camcan, Apr 21, 14:52:54
        
        Without hindsight I completely and utterly disagree (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 21, 15:06:09
        
        except (NCFC) - camcan, Apr 21, 15:30:21
        
        with hindsight i agree, at the time though i'd have said it was the right thing to at (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Apr 21, 15:02:58
        
        Hindsight shows CC is right, I was in Ralf's camp at the time though (NCFC) - megson, Apr 21, 15:09:07
        
        that should have been almost a third of the next season (NCFC) - megson, Apr 21, 15:12:38
        
        Burnley was the 10th league game (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Apr 21, 15:15:58
        
        Well there you go then. Had they sacked him after 9, the planets would have re-alligned (NCFC) - megson, Apr 21, 15:28:14
        
        I thought Worthington was in last chance saloon when he took us down (NCFC) - pants, Apr 21, 15:01:57
        
        Actually, that's about right. (n/m) (NCFC) - megson, Apr 21, 14:25:41
        
        I just remember like below, games like Burnley at home (NCFC) - pants, Apr 21, 14:36:19
        
        And you know what? I'd probably take that squad now. As bad as it was (NCFC) - megson, Apr 21, 14:44:46
        
        For me, we found out just what it was about (NCFC) - pants, Apr 21, 14:55:16
        
        it was Roeder's valuation of Taylor (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Apr 21, 15:06:07
        
        any evidence for these "promises"? (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 21, 15:00:18
        
        I do think that promise was a joke, and all parties intended for it to be seen as such, (NCFC) - megson, Apr 21, 14:58:45
        
        See in the middle of all the spin (NCFC) - pants, Apr 21, 15:06:45
        
        But if it was Roeder walking away....... (NCFC) - megson, Apr 21, 15:11:57
        
        I've seen it too many times with us now (NCFC) - pants, Apr 21, 15:19:28
        
        or we could've broken the bank for someone like Billy Sharp (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 21, 15:23:51
        
        Yeah, but all transfers are like that, there is a degree of punt in them all (NCFC) - megson, Apr 21, 15:37:41
        
        the thing with all of these though (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 21, 15:13:57
        
        All true, can't deny it. Suppose that's part of what makes the game interesting (NCFC) - megson, Apr 21, 15:14:59
        
        yeah I'm happy to discuss (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 21, 15:20:43
        
        I agree on the cullum thing too, and i could be wrong, but like you (NCFC) - megson, Apr 21, 15:30:40
        
        Equally when fans feel they've got their way, the same conclusions become ridiculous (NCFC) - pants, Apr 21, 15:51:17
        
        Yeah, as much as your constant use of that issue irks me, you have a point, (NCFC) - megson, Apr 21, 15:57:38
        
        cool (NCFC) - pants, Apr 21, 16:20:46
        
        In a bitchy sense (NCFC) - pants, Apr 21, 16:45:44
        
        "but is still going round most threads of mine and replying." (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Apr 21, 17:10:58
        
        I think he means me actually (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 21, 17:34:28
        
        "And I know he can read what I'm saying so that's all that matters." (NCFC) - pants, Apr 21, 18:16:23
        
        well if I'm being ignored and you can't read it (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 21, 18:20:08
        
        You mistake me having you on ignore (NCFC) - pants, Apr 21, 18:24:19
        
        I don't mistake anything (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 21, 18:28:46
        
        "please reply pants, please, please reply, I need this, it's like food (NCFC) - pants, Apr 21, 18:31:30
        
        I think the Henville bloke became an issue (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 21, 16:04:54
        
        Gunn arrived in the middle of a transfer window (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Apr 21, 16:16:23
        
        True, but the stick isn't in the right proportions for me. As I said, was non plussed (NCFC) - megson, Apr 21, 16:15:58
        
        agree (NCFC) - pants, Apr 21, 16:23:02
        
        lol (n/m) (NCFC) - megson, Apr 21, 16:40:27
        
        Killen has been a failure (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 21, 15:54:45
        
        yeah I'm happy to discuss (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 21, 15:19:51
        
        just because you don't like an answer it doesn't mean that it's automatically spin (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Apr 21, 15:10:54
        
        thank you (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 21, 15:12:15
        
        because we don't have the money? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 21, 15:08:29
        
        we are never happy (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 21, 14:47:52
        
        i think that's the one positive that we're all clinging to should relegation happen (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Apr 21, 14:19:41
        
        and the 20% rebate of course... (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 21, 14:22:30
        
        not us non-season ticket holders (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Apr 21, 14:24:39
        
        DoY is the master rebater though (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Apr 21, 14:41:22

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.