In a b***hy sense
I'm just playing the game that I said we'd go down if we sacked Roeder, and many said I was talking s**t
Now we look like we are, or that it hasn't gone how people thought it would getting the legends back here, that's why I'm doing it in a b***hy way
Because, it's the same b***hy way Lupoli not being in the squad meant that he and other players hated Roeder (because one poster on here said so, yet when Gunn was in charge, Lupoli said he wasn't sticking around because we sacked Roeder, and he didn't like how we unstable and crumbling. I agree with Lupoli in that sense, it's kind of why I said we'd go down if we sacked Roeder, because we never lay in the bed we've made. When we finally do, we'll finally realise it's been long over due)
I could quit the whole fact stuff, but then again, others could quit the whole huckerby thing, or any other bandwagon thing
Roeder's my gem I keep for when they make me angry
I'm just sorry you wrote a detailed post feeling you had to explain it to me. I'm just being a tosser for the sake of others who are a tosser to me regularly, and have tosser viewpoints about former players (like Henville), or have tosser views about Alan Lee at me like many did, but now think he's great and have always rated him, yet I was a cock for rating him, when he was actually s**t, etc etc :)
This is an on and on and on and on thing, but that's how this site rumbles on. There's a poster on here that knows from the other day, and even said that they thought I'd be ignoring him from now on, but is still going round most threads of mine and replying. Why? Because he knows I'm ignoring him, and doesn't want me to. It's the same reason selwyn keeps asking me how big my willy is (because I haven't replied to him for ages and he doesn't like it)
I have all this daily from about 5 or 6 people, all anchoring after it. Yeah I play the victim, but these people know the way to start me off, is to pretend they're up for a reasoned debate about stuff. Once they get smug, they know I don't like it, and then it escalates. Then I get the blame at the end
It's a real shame it's come to all that, but I just have to ignore what looks like an innocent conversation, because it's not what's on the table at all
Also, if I ever point out what someone is doing, that's just a jackpot to many on here, because that's a definitely bite and it all starts. Then at the end, I get the blame
So I'm telling you this cos you're probably one of the nicest on here, and you mean well, and you know all of the above anyway. I'm just moving away slowly from what I'm supposed to do on here every day (ie, throw a big hollywood hissy fit for entertainment), and I'm doing my own laughs to counteract the constant bickering I get, which I'm not allowed to defend myself against
Hope this helps meggers. I need my releases on here just like the trolls or others do
Posted By: pants on April 21st 2009 at 16:45:44
Message Thread
- See Towergate are really f**ked then! (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 21, 13:59:01
- I wouldn't discount him yet (NCFC) - Ben, Apr 21, 14:59:41
- Cullum can go fuck himself, put your money where your mouth is you lip licking cunt (n/m) (NCFC) - stringersrevenge, Apr 21, 14:44:31
- Yes obviously it was all to get a few cheap column inches in the f**king EDP! (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 21, 14:52:09
- Show me the money? That should hav (n/m) (NCFC) - stringersrevenge, Apr 21, 14:55:16
- e been the EDP headline followed by fuck off then you gimp (NCFC) - stringersrevenge, Apr 21, 14:56:30
- Timing was not great but what can you do when they won't talk to you! (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 21, 15:10:14
- how did they not talk to him? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 21, 15:10:56
- because they never f**king met him! (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 21, 15:42:23
- I think its was more being talked at, than talking to. (n/m) (NCFC) - megson, Apr 21, 15:13:18
- how did they not talk to him? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 21, 15:10:56
- Timing was not great but what can you do when they won't talk to you! (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 21, 15:10:14
- e been the EDP headline followed by fuck off then you gimp (NCFC) - stringersrevenge, Apr 21, 14:56:30
- agreed (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 21, 14:53:02
- Enough agreeing already (NCFC) - stringersrevenge, Apr 21, 14:57:43
- Show me the money? That should hav (n/m) (NCFC) - stringersrevenge, Apr 21, 14:55:16
- agreed (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 21, 14:48:04
- Yes obviously it was all to get a few cheap column inches in the f**king EDP! (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 21, 14:52:09
- He promised he wouldn't see us go down though (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Apr 21, 14:05:25
- He's going to shut his eyes (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Apr 21, 14:27:52
- he said he wouldn't see us go down the tubes (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Apr 21, 14:09:05
- we need to get over this Cullum thing (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 21, 13:59:34
- Rubbish - he is (and always has been) our main hope (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 21, 14:17:28
- Err, why? (NCFC) - Old Git, Apr 21, 14:04:25
- Agree with now, our board have no excuses, if they have the club at heart (NCFC) - pants, Apr 21, 14:07:17
- Most sensible pants post EVER. (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 21, 14:29:49
- Wierd, i still feel an instinctive reaction to wade in and defend the club on the Cullum (NCFC) - megson, Apr 21, 14:14:34
- Takes two to tango (NCFC) - Old Git, Apr 21, 14:25:57
- Its does. (NCFC) - megson, Apr 21, 14:41:55
- You ahve to take a risk or two (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 21, 14:51:36
- Yep, i can see the sense in that, and like i say, i'd welcome him (NCFC) - megson, Apr 21, 14:55:54
- You ahve to take a risk or two (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 21, 14:51:36
- Its does. (NCFC) - megson, Apr 21, 14:41:55
- agree with that (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Apr 21, 14:20:23
- Takes two to tango (NCFC) - Old Git, Apr 21, 14:25:57
- But the point about relegation is that it may well mean the board/Delia won't be ABLE (NCFC) - Old Git, Apr 21, 14:13:22
- I feel slightly guilty saying this (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 21, 14:15:46
- ego te absolvo (NCFC) - Old Git, Apr 21, 14:27:27
- I felt like this the season we sacked Worthington, that it might not (NCFC) - pants, Apr 21, 14:22:59
- we should have sacked worthington when we left the prem (NCFC) - camcan, Apr 21, 14:52:54
- Without hindsight I completely and utterly disagree (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 21, 15:06:09
- with hindsight i agree, at the time though i'd have said it was the right thing to at (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Apr 21, 15:02:58
- Hindsight shows CC is right, I was in Ralf's camp at the time though (NCFC) - megson, Apr 21, 15:09:07
- that should have been almost a third of the next season (NCFC) - megson, Apr 21, 15:12:38
- Burnley was the 10th league game (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Apr 21, 15:15:58
- Well there you go then. Had they sacked him after 9, the planets would have re-alligned (NCFC) - megson, Apr 21, 15:28:14
- Burnley was the 10th league game (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Apr 21, 15:15:58
- that should have been almost a third of the next season (NCFC) - megson, Apr 21, 15:12:38
- Hindsight shows CC is right, I was in Ralf's camp at the time though (NCFC) - megson, Apr 21, 15:09:07
- I thought Worthington was in last chance saloon when he took us down (NCFC) - pants, Apr 21, 15:01:57
- Actually, that's about right. (n/m) (NCFC) - megson, Apr 21, 14:25:41
- I just remember like below, games like Burnley at home (NCFC) - pants, Apr 21, 14:36:19
- And you know what? I'd probably take that squad now. As bad as it was (NCFC) - megson, Apr 21, 14:44:46
- For me, we found out just what it was about (NCFC) - pants, Apr 21, 14:55:16
- it was Roeder's valuation of Taylor (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Apr 21, 15:06:07
- any evidence for these "promises"? (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 21, 15:00:18
- I do think that promise was a joke, and all parties intended for it to be seen as such, (NCFC) - megson, Apr 21, 14:58:45
- See in the middle of all the spin (NCFC) - pants, Apr 21, 15:06:45
- But if it was Roeder walking away....... (NCFC) - megson, Apr 21, 15:11:57
- I've seen it too many times with us now (NCFC) - pants, Apr 21, 15:19:28
- or we could've broken the bank for someone like Billy Sharp (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 21, 15:23:51
- Yeah, but all transfers are like that, there is a degree of punt in them all (NCFC) - megson, Apr 21, 15:37:41
- or we could've broken the bank for someone like Billy Sharp (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 21, 15:23:51
- the thing with all of these though (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 21, 15:13:57
- All true, can't deny it. Suppose that's part of what makes the game interesting (NCFC) - megson, Apr 21, 15:14:59
- yeah I'm happy to discuss (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 21, 15:20:43
- I agree on the cullum thing too, and i could be wrong, but like you (NCFC) - megson, Apr 21, 15:30:40
- Equally when fans feel they've got their way, the same conclusions become ridiculous (NCFC) - pants, Apr 21, 15:51:17
- Yeah, as much as your constant use of that issue irks me, you have a point, (NCFC) - megson, Apr 21, 15:57:38
- cool (NCFC) - pants, Apr 21, 16:20:46
- In a bitchy sense (NCFC) - pants, Apr 21, 16:45:44
- "but is still going round most threads of mine and replying." (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Apr 21, 17:10:58
- I think he means me actually (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 21, 17:34:28
- "And I know he can read what I'm saying so that's all that matters." (NCFC) - pants, Apr 21, 18:16:23
- well if I'm being ignored and you can't read it (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 21, 18:20:08
- You mistake me having you on ignore (NCFC) - pants, Apr 21, 18:24:19
- I don't mistake anything (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 21, 18:28:46
- "please reply pants, please, please reply, I need this, it's like food (NCFC) - pants, Apr 21, 18:31:30
- I don't mistake anything (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 21, 18:28:46
- You mistake me having you on ignore (NCFC) - pants, Apr 21, 18:24:19
- well if I'm being ignored and you can't read it (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 21, 18:20:08
- "And I know he can read what I'm saying so that's all that matters." (NCFC) - pants, Apr 21, 18:16:23
- I think he means me actually (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 21, 17:34:28
- "but is still going round most threads of mine and replying." (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Apr 21, 17:10:58
- In a bitchy sense (NCFC) - pants, Apr 21, 16:45:44
- I think the Henville bloke became an issue (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 21, 16:04:54
- Gunn arrived in the middle of a transfer window (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Apr 21, 16:16:23
- True, but the stick isn't in the right proportions for me. As I said, was non plussed (NCFC) - megson, Apr 21, 16:15:58
- cool (NCFC) - pants, Apr 21, 16:20:46
- Killen has been a failure (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 21, 15:54:45
- Yeah, as much as your constant use of that issue irks me, you have a point, (NCFC) - megson, Apr 21, 15:57:38
- Equally when fans feel they've got their way, the same conclusions become ridiculous (NCFC) - pants, Apr 21, 15:51:17
- I agree on the cullum thing too, and i could be wrong, but like you (NCFC) - megson, Apr 21, 15:30:40
- yeah I'm happy to discuss (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 21, 15:19:51
- yeah I'm happy to discuss (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 21, 15:20:43
- All true, can't deny it. Suppose that's part of what makes the game interesting (NCFC) - megson, Apr 21, 15:14:59
- I've seen it too many times with us now (NCFC) - pants, Apr 21, 15:19:28
- just because you don't like an answer it doesn't mean that it's automatically spin (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Apr 21, 15:10:54
- because we don't have the money? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 21, 15:08:29
- But if it was Roeder walking away....... (NCFC) - megson, Apr 21, 15:11:57
- See in the middle of all the spin (NCFC) - pants, Apr 21, 15:06:45
- we are never happy (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 21, 14:47:52
- For me, we found out just what it was about (NCFC) - pants, Apr 21, 14:55:16
- And you know what? I'd probably take that squad now. As bad as it was (NCFC) - megson, Apr 21, 14:44:46
- I just remember like below, games like Burnley at home (NCFC) - pants, Apr 21, 14:36:19
- we should have sacked worthington when we left the prem (NCFC) - camcan, Apr 21, 14:52:54
- i think that's the one positive that we're all clinging to should relegation happen (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Apr 21, 14:19:41
- and the 20% rebate of course... (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 21, 14:22:30
- not us non-season ticket holders (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Apr 21, 14:24:39
- DoY is the master rebater though (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Apr 21, 14:41:22
- not us non-season ticket holders (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Apr 21, 14:24:39
- and the 20% rebate of course... (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 21, 14:22:30
- I feel slightly guilty saying this (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 21, 14:15:46
- Agree with now, our board have no excuses, if they have the club at heart (NCFC) - pants, Apr 21, 14:07:17
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.