aided by citv
Posted By: pants on October 10th 2008 at 10:22:37
Message Thread
- What's the deal with Hoolahan? (NCFC) - big member, Oct 10, 10:13:05
- Here's my groat's worth (NCFC) - camcan, Oct 10, 11:32:28
- Sounds a bit like Croft (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Oct 10, 11:42:44
- Spot on. (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Oct 10, 11:35:53
- I am similarly perplexed. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Oct 10, 10:26:25
- lol. Is he a little hucks like, in that does he really have a position? (NCFC) - megson, Oct 10, 10:33:17
- I wondered about centre-mid, alongside Clingan, or Fotheringham, if he ever remembers how (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Oct 10, 10:56:25
- He played really well in the pre-season friendlies. (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Oct 10, 11:01:53
- Could be the future. Too attacking for Roeder though? (NCFC) - megson, Oct 10, 11:08:19
- I have it on reasonable authority that (NCFC) - big member, Oct 10, 11:13:31
- reasonable authority (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Oct 10, 11:24:37
- bit better than that (NCFC) - big member, Oct 10, 11:45:32
- Yet, many were all so damning of Grant for being the nice guy and pandering to players? (NCFC) - pants, Oct 10, 11:24:22
- were they?? (NCFC) - Charles21, Oct 10, 11:42:25
- But when did Grant ever criticise the better players? (NCFC) - pants, Oct 10, 11:44:46
- Youssef Safri (n/m) (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Oct 10, 11:55:22
- Croft - through the press, before he'd even informed Croft of his displeasure. (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Oct 10, 11:51:26
- Cureton (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Oct 10, 11:50:46
- wasn't that roeder? (n/m) (NCFC) - megson, Oct 10, 11:44:32
- or am i getting all mixed up again? (n/m) (NCFC) - megson, Oct 10, 11:45:33
- No, that was Grant (NCFC) - Charles21, Oct 10, 11:50:32
- ah yes, hadn't he got 2 or something? went for the hat trick when a pass was on? (NCFC) - megson, Oct 10, 12:05:33
- After the 5-2 v Barnet - slated Curo for going for a hat-trick. (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Oct 10, 11:51:42
- I'm glad with a new man around, Cureton has really shown him since (NCFC) - pants, Oct 10, 12:12:49
- There's a lot of shit in that post...firstly... (NCFC) - Brandonio, Oct 10, 12:25:34
- He got his number of games wrong, means at this point (NCFC) - megson, Oct 10, 12:31:08
- ah right - a 100% record at home...I remember when that used to happen (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Oct 10, 12:35:09
- Look, he's probably being harsh on him, but NW WAS under pressure. (NCFC) - megson, Oct 10, 12:42:39
- ah right - a 100% record at home...I remember when that used to happen (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Oct 10, 12:35:09
- hazey memory, five games in then when we lost to forest (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Oct 10, 12:30:44
- In 2002/03, he got about 300k to spend, and look at the season we had... (NCFC) - Brandonio, Oct 10, 12:29:19
- a season of denial really (NCFC) - pants, Oct 10, 12:35:22
- what would you rather? (NCFC) - Charles21, Oct 10, 12:48:29
- keep twisting (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Oct 10, 12:51:50
- keep not answering valud points (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Oct 10, 12:54:20
- valid (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Oct 10, 12:54:27
- What's the point when you're just twisting my views? (NCFC) - pants, Oct 10, 12:56:18
- just forget it (NCFC) - Charles21, Oct 10, 13:12:34
- good (NCFC) - pants, Oct 10, 13:15:02
- what did you want them to say then?? (NCFC) - Charles21, Oct 10, 13:28:07
- I wanted them to be realistic (NCFC) - pants, Oct 10, 14:22:35
- Sad times!! (NCFC) - Charles21, Oct 10, 16:22:23
- 05/06 I mean (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Oct 10, 14:25:48
- I wanted them to be realistic (NCFC) - pants, Oct 10, 14:22:35
- what did you want them to say then?? (NCFC) - Charles21, Oct 10, 13:28:07
- good (NCFC) - pants, Oct 10, 13:15:02
- just forget it (NCFC) - Charles21, Oct 10, 13:12:34
- What's the point when you're just twisting my views? (NCFC) - pants, Oct 10, 12:56:18
- valid (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Oct 10, 12:54:27
- keep not answering valud points (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Oct 10, 12:54:20
- keep twisting (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Oct 10, 12:51:50
- not really...4pts off going into Wolves game (NCFC) - Brandonio, Oct 10, 12:44:47
- what would you rather? (NCFC) - Charles21, Oct 10, 12:48:29
- I read that as what pants meant, spent little did ok. Or have i got that wrong? (n/m) (NCFC) - megson, Oct 10, 12:34:25
- nope, I meant it as (NCFC) - pants, Oct 10, 12:46:45
- Last three lines of that are interesting, I'd like to see what GR could do (NCFC) - megson, Oct 10, 12:52:03
- nope, I meant it as (NCFC) - pants, Oct 10, 12:46:45
- a season of denial really (NCFC) - pants, Oct 10, 12:35:22
- He got his number of games wrong, means at this point (NCFC) - megson, Oct 10, 12:31:08
- There's a lot of shit in that post...firstly... (NCFC) - Brandonio, Oct 10, 12:25:34
- that's the one (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Oct 10, 11:55:00
- I'm glad with a new man around, Cureton has really shown him since (NCFC) - pants, Oct 10, 12:12:49
- No, that was Grant (NCFC) - Charles21, Oct 10, 11:50:32
- or am i getting all mixed up again? (n/m) (NCFC) - megson, Oct 10, 11:45:33
- But when did Grant ever criticise the better players? (NCFC) - pants, Oct 10, 11:44:46
- were they?? (NCFC) - Charles21, Oct 10, 11:42:25
- I believe there may be something in that, like you say its a shame, (NCFC) - megson, Oct 10, 11:16:56
- True, and he's supposed to be a professional, and should act like one (NCFC) - pants, Oct 10, 11:25:48
- I really wouldn't attach too much importance on what players are saying in the papers (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Oct 10, 11:32:46
- what players are saying in the papers (NCFC) - camcan, Oct 10, 11:40:15
- was Wesold picked because he was Irish and it was the Irish Daily Mail doing the asking? (n/m) (NCFC) - blindasabat, Oct 10, 11:45:32
- that would be logical (NCFC) - camcan, Oct 10, 11:49:13
- was Wesold picked because he was Irish and it was the Irish Daily Mail doing the asking? (n/m) (NCFC) - blindasabat, Oct 10, 11:45:32
- Totally, but if he did sound off (NCFC) - pants, Oct 10, 11:39:07
- what players are saying in the papers (NCFC) - camcan, Oct 10, 11:40:15
- Exactly, if IF he was dropped for being late, doesn't mean there has to be a bust up (NCFC) - megson, Oct 10, 11:28:18
- snot exciting though is it? (NCFC) - pants, Oct 10, 11:38:31
- I really wouldn't attach too much importance on what players are saying in the papers (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Oct 10, 11:32:46
- True, and he's supposed to be a professional, and should act like one (NCFC) - pants, Oct 10, 11:25:48
- i'm no great fan of Alan, but i do believe him on this (NCFC) - blindasabat, Oct 10, 11:16:46
- ohh hadn't seen that, fair enough then. (NCFC) - megson, Oct 10, 11:17:42
- reasonable authority (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Oct 10, 11:24:37
- Bristol (n/m) (NCFC) - blindasabat, Oct 10, 11:09:06
- I have it on reasonable authority that (NCFC) - big member, Oct 10, 11:13:31
- Could be the future. Too attacking for Roeder though? (NCFC) - megson, Oct 10, 11:08:19
- He played really well in the pre-season friendlies. (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Oct 10, 11:01:53
- I wondered about centre-mid, alongside Clingan, or Fotheringham, if he ever remembers how (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Oct 10, 10:56:25
- what's with the cunty answer? (NCFC) - Rofl_Harris, Oct 10, 10:31:15
- Cunty answer? Me? (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Oct 10, 10:38:14
- seeing as most of the Pants Massive hasn't seen him actually play for us... (NCFC) - Rofl_Harris, Oct 10, 11:01:37
- Result. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Oct 10, 11:07:12
- I'm not entirely sure why the whole 'not seen him play' thing matters (NCFC) - megson, Oct 10, 11:10:22
- Result. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Oct 10, 11:07:12
- Isn't the real irony... (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Oct 10, 10:47:31
- haha, I was wondering when I'd get a mention (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Oct 10, 11:03:16
- One man's irony is another man's c**ty (NCFC) - Nelsons final flanel, Oct 10, 10:43:09
- Merkins don't get irony, but they do get c**nty. (NCFC) - jafski, Oct 10, 10:50:14
- seeing as most of the Pants Massive hasn't seen him actually play for us... (NCFC) - Rofl_Harris, Oct 10, 11:01:37
- That's not his point though was it? Not saying he hasn't struggled (NCFC) - megson, Oct 10, 10:34:22
- yes but (NCFC) - blindasabat, Oct 10, 10:40:41
- True, ROEDER OUT. (NCFC) - megson, Oct 10, 10:49:42
- yes but (NCFC) - blindasabat, Oct 10, 10:40:41
- Cunty answer? Me? (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Oct 10, 10:38:14
- lol (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Oct 10, 10:27:02
- lol. Is he a little hucks like, in that does he really have a position? (NCFC) - megson, Oct 10, 10:33:17
- Don't believe the rumours, it's a smear campaign (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Oct 10, 10:20:24
- aided by citv (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Oct 10, 10:22:37
- Roeder cannot obviously handle him Wes is a great player (n/m) (NCFC) - colincanary, Oct 10, 10:14:47
- Depends if you interpret rumour as fact I guess (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Oct 10, 10:14:39
- whaddya mean? (NCFC) - blindasabat, Oct 10, 10:18:36
- Here's my groat's worth (NCFC) - camcan, Oct 10, 11:32:28
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.