I'll agree that the change was too late...
but it did change the midfield from a 4 to a 3, giving the nopposition something else to think about, this time it didn't work but if Ashton's header had of gone in none of us would have been even questioning these changes
Posted By: Swiss Yellow on August 7th 2005 at 12:47:26
Message Thread
- I don't think worthington is proactive (NCFC) - wreka, Aug 7, 11:31:15
- He doesn't seem to be able to change a game in progress (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Aug 7, 12:23:27
- At least when he did change it was positive... (NCFC) - Swiss Yellow, Aug 7, 12:31:47
- Putting Thorne on seemed dumb to me - just means we are left with a hit & hope tactic (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Aug 7, 13:03:01
- I was thinking during the match that we needed to change things (NCFC) - Swiss Yellow, Aug 7, 13:19:42
- No, Charlton's not a winger any more than he's a midfielder (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Aug 7, 13:29:41
- I was thinking during the match that we needed to change things (NCFC) - Swiss Yellow, Aug 7, 13:19:42
- After 80 mins is not positive (NCFC) - inutero, Aug 7, 12:38:54
- I'll agree that the change was too late... (NCFC) - Swiss Yellow, Aug 7, 12:47:26
- Putting Thorne on seemed dumb to me - just means we are left with a hit & hope tactic (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Aug 7, 13:03:01
- At least when he did change it was positive... (NCFC) - Swiss Yellow, Aug 7, 12:31:47
- He doesn't seem to be able to change a game in progress (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Aug 7, 12:23:27
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.