I don't think worthington is proactive

because if huckerby, (one of our best attacking players ) is being marked by at least two players and is there for almost out the game you would move him or give him a free role so that the defense can't keep up with the changes so then leaving bigger gaps to explore.

What was the theory behind putting a 6foot plus attacker on the right so we have more strikers on the pitch i believe a change needed to be in the centre of the field rather thean the right. the midfield starting line up there again wasn't positive enough (charlton is not a midfield player)

Sorry if i am going on first time and worthington irrates me

Posted By: wreka on August 7th 2005 at 11:31:15

Message Thread

I don't think worthington is proactive (NCFC) - wreka, Aug 7, 11:31:15
- He doesn't seem to be able to change a game in progress (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Aug 7, 12:23:27
  - At least when he did change it was positive... (NCFC) - Swiss Yellow, Aug 7, 12:31:47
    - Putting Thorne on seemed dumb to me - just means we are left with a hit & hope tactic (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Aug 7, 13:03:01
      - I was thinking during the match that we needed to change things (NCFC) - Swiss Yellow, Aug 7, 13:19:42
        
        No, Charlton's not a winger any more than he's a midfielder (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Aug 7, 13:29:41
    - After 80 mins is not positive (NCFC) - inutero, Aug 7, 12:38:54
      - I'll agree that the change was too late... (NCFC) - Swiss Yellow, Aug 7, 12:47:26

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.