if we had announced he was available, could we have started a bidding war?

does the clause mean that we weren't allowed to ask for more for Earnie, and that any club that was interested could put down 3.5 mill, or if there had been two clubs involved could we have pushed up the price.

the clause was there for earnie's benefit, but if you've got two teams bidding for him and they start at 3.5m then the club would benefit too.

Posted By: Dave in France on June 29th 2007 at 22:54:09

Message Thread

Where do we go now? (NCFC) - andrewburwood, Jun 29, 22:43:44
- You just wonder (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Jun 29, 22:53:31
- its not that he been sold,but 4 how much and how the board fucked up (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Jun 29, 22:45:16
  - Common conscensus... (NCFC) - andrewburwood, Jun 29, 22:49:28
    - i hope so too but have no faith in the people running our club at mo (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Jun 29, 22:50:42
      - if we had announced he was available, could we have started a bidding war? (NCFC) - Dave in France, Jun 29, 22:54:09
        
        Not sure, but (NCFC) - andrewburwood, Jun 29, 22:59:15
      - Surely... (NCFC) - andrewburwood, Jun 29, 22:53:57

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.