conventional seems more sensible

In terms of deterrent though, would think they are more concerned with the emerging nuclear nations, and itchy fingers on those triggers.
Would much rather see us take a step and scrap them though, if Blair wants a legacy he's got one right there.

What's the point anyway? if someone nukes us does it really matter if we can fire back?
In terms of deterrent too, surely the Yanks have enough for both of us?
Suppose there is no guarantee of that they'd back us, and if someone knew we couyldn't retailiate in kind it may make the nuclear option more inviting if we pressed their conventional forces.

I dunno, I don't like them, not entirely convinced we have reached the stage where we don't need them yet though.

Posted By: megson on March 13th 2007 at 14:46:28

Message Thread

Trident (General Chat) - Old Git, Mar 13, 14:31:08
- but billions will be recycled through income tax etc. (n/m) (General Chat) - Commisar_Canary, Mar 13, 16:39:33
- Nuclear weapons are SOOOOOOO (General Chat) - CB41, Mar 13, 15:34:46
- Lovely .... (General Chat) - meeky, Mar 13, 15:09:06
  - Whahey (General Chat) - Clare, Mar 13, 15:21:31
  - hey meeky (General Chat) - Dave in France, Mar 13, 15:10:04
    - Well not really ... (General Chat) - meeky, Mar 13, 15:24:54
      - Should of added ... (General Chat) - meeky, Mar 13, 15:27:19
        
        i've got an idea and i need to know how much it would cost to produce (General Chat) - Dave in France, Mar 13, 15:44:54
        
        Feck! .... (General Chat) - meeky, Mar 13, 15:59:10
        
        flexible plastic, that is (General Chat) - Dave in France, Mar 13, 15:45:21
    - Yeah, he's a pacifist (General Chat) - Old Git, Mar 13, 15:13:27
- conventional seems more sensible (General Chat) - megson, Mar 13, 14:46:28
- Mililtary Industrial Complex, OG. It's all good for business (General Chat) - BerlinCanary, Mar 13, 14:43:15
  - But they could spend the money on other things (General Chat) - Old Git, Mar 13, 14:48:43
    - Well, yes; but nuclear weapons are BIG money (General Chat) - BerlinCanary, Mar 13, 15:40:40
    - Helicopters .... (General Chat) - meeky, Mar 13, 15:10:10
    - "But quite clearly we are not going to be in the business of engaging in large-scale, (General Chat) - Tomblander, Mar 13, 15:03:05
      - Exactly (General Chat) - Old Git, Mar 13, 15:12:31
        
        Meanwhile .... (General Chat) - Tomblander, Mar 13, 15:15:44
    - or a big tv screen on the moon (General Chat) - Dave in France, Mar 13, 14:59:35
  - ... (General Chat) - pants, Mar 13, 14:48:05
    - Great track and great album (n/m) (General Chat) - BerlinCanary, Mar 13, 16:13:10
  - The ideological state apparatus (General Chat) - slater, Mar 13, 14:44:37
- I agree... though for slightly different reasons (General Chat) - slater, Mar 13, 14:40:22
- mastication for the nation? (n/m) (General Chat) - Brandonio, Mar 13, 14:35:26
  - nah, that's Keeley (n/m) (General Chat) - Yellalee, Mar 13, 14:36:46
    - Isn't that masturbation for the nation? (n/m) (General Chat) - Old Git, Mar 13, 14:53:41
      - could be both if you're kinky (n/m) (General Chat) - Yellalee, Mar 13, 14:57:11

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.