I fell for that too, I thought at the time Andy Hughes was good

but Andy Hughes of 2002/03 was good, not the one from 03-05, which is why Reading fans laughed their heads off when we signed him

Posted By: pants on November 24th 2006 at 15:56:19

Message Thread

BRING BACK WORTHY!!! BRING BACK WORTHY!!!!! (NCFC) - hairyolaf, Nov 24, 15:23:50
- lola, marginally better. You mean our away form success increased about 10000% (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Nov 24, 15:31:58
  - maybe a shortterm boost in confidence? (NCFC) - hairyolaf, Nov 24, 15:46:44
    - it's hard to judge grant with worthy's players, I like Chadwick and it's unfortunate (NCFC) - pants, Nov 24, 15:53:52
      - im not anti Grant (NCFC) - hairyolaf, Nov 24, 16:22:00
        
        Fair enough, but worthy signed all those players (NCFC) - pants, Nov 24, 16:45:02
        
        while the problems wit the players is fair (NCFC) - megson, Nov 24, 16:33:01
        
        worthy was a victim of his own success (NCFC) - hairyolaf, Nov 24, 16:43:17
        
        when others were available and norwich had the resources to buy better (NCFC) - pants, Nov 24, 16:52:08
        
        etuhu has turned out to be the player the worthy thought (NCFC) - hairyolaf, Nov 24, 17:11:39
- Maybe is he is fo fixed on buying shit players (NCFC) - conker, Nov 24, 15:25:04
  - i agree hughes has been playing shit but if you look at the pedigree he was'nt a gamble (n/m) (NCFC) - hairyolaf, Nov 24, 15:29:55
    - hughes was meant to be the new holt (NCFC) - hairyolaf, Nov 24, 15:37:28
      - Ask ANY Reading fan about Andy Hughes (NCFC) - duke of york, Nov 24, 16:07:19
      - I fell for that too, I thought at the time Andy Hughes was good (NCFC) - pants, Nov 24, 15:56:19
      - he IS the new Holt (NCFC) - mr carra, Nov 24, 15:48:39

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.