I'm not quite sure this works

and not being a mathematician I can't quite explain why, but in essence it stands to reason that there will be a higher percentage of spend on the more succesful players as they were, initially, more expensive players. Surely you have to apply some sort of weighting in these calculations? btw I'm not picking fault deliberately as there's a lot I agree with (though I wouldn't personally put Leon in the successes, and Ashton's biggest success was in making us a profit as ultimately his contribution mattered diddly sqauttity do on the pitch).

Posted By: camcan on September 28th 2006 at 13:12:01

Message Thread

Worthy's transfer record (easy copy for Archant) (NCFC) - Old Git, Sep 28, 13:01:42
- Comment (NCFC) - The King of Prussia, Sep 28, 13:25:46
  - Dunno (NCFC) - Old Git, Sep 28, 13:39:37
- Disagree with some (NCFC) - matgore, Sep 28, 13:25:15
- every manager is hit and miss in the transfer market... (NCFC) - beckford, Sep 28, 13:18:06
- Good analysis... (NCFC) - Barclay_Steve, Sep 28, 13:16:51
  - Completely agree re Jonson and Helveg (NCFC) - Old Git, Sep 28, 13:38:02
- I'm not quite sure this works (NCFC) - camcan, Sep 28, 13:12:01
  - Except that (NCFC) - Old Git, Sep 28, 13:35:22
- just one tiny point (NCFC) - Jonny 5 is alive, Sep 28, 13:11:26
- Thing about Easton and Rivers is that they were integral (NCFC) - Old Gregg, Sep 28, 13:10:33
  - See your point, but (NCFC) - Old Git, Sep 28, 13:36:20
    - i'd probably go for success for them two (NCFC) - megson, Sep 28, 14:11:21
- omg (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 26, Sep 28, 13:10:19
- His transfers are better than his tatics, he's never really lost us money (NCFC) - stringersrevenge, Sep 28, 13:09:37

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.