contributes little; talks obvious bollocks

jerry hall would be a pretty good candidate.
Also - this would be my tactic in the opening rounds - it might be possible to gather more evidence re probable traitors as time passes. It is also tactic that incentivises contribution - works against the "under the radar" approach which can be very effective. Basically, it's quite annoying that in some series, the winners are just the idiots left over at the end because they're too plonkerish to appear to be likely traitors, and the faithfuls have banished people who "would be good traitors" (ie are in fact good faithfuls

Posted By: paulg on October 15th 2026 at 14:55:22

Message Thread

a modest proposal for destabilising the traitors... (General Chat) - Tombs, Oct 15, 12:38:11
- Why not double down and pinch both neighbours for extra carnage (n/m) (General Chat) - footymadman, Oct 15, 22:16:01
- My proposal if I were to be on it (General Chat) - Charles21, Oct 15, 13:26:48
  - that seems to be a pretty good tactic if you could get half the group together alone (General Chat) - Tombs, Oct 15, 13:36:21
    - I've always thought (General Chat) - paulg, Oct 15, 13:45:41
      - what makes a "bad faithful"? (General Chat) - Charles21, Oct 15, 14:12:00
        
        contributes little; talks obvious bollocks (General Chat) - paulg, Oct 15, 14:55:22
      - that has some merit (General Chat) - Tombs, Oct 15, 14:01:14
- machiavellian (General Chat) - Tombs, Oct 15, 12:40:44

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.