I've always thought
that the faithfuls should banish bad faithfuls (based on more easily gathered evidence) rather than try (historically, very unsuccessfully) to banish traitors. At least by banishing a useless faithful, you achieve something useful (or not too damaging) - and at the same time, you might by chance get rid of a traitor.
Posted By: paulg on October 15th 2026 at 13:45:41
Message Thread
- a modest proposal for destabilising the traitors... (General Chat) - Tombs, Oct 15, 12:38:11
- Why not double down and pinch both neighbours for extra carnage (n/m) (General Chat) - footymadman, Oct 15, 22:16:01
- My proposal if I were to be on it (General Chat) - Charles21, Oct 15, 13:26:48
- that seems to be a pretty good tactic if you could get half the group together alone (General Chat) - Tombs, Oct 15, 13:36:21
- I've always thought (General Chat) - paulg, Oct 15, 13:45:41
- what makes a "bad faithful"? (General Chat) - Charles21, Oct 15, 14:12:00
- contributes little; talks obvious bollocks (General Chat) - paulg, Oct 15, 14:55:22
- that has some merit (General Chat) - Tombs, Oct 15, 14:01:14
- what makes a "bad faithful"? (General Chat) - Charles21, Oct 15, 14:12:00
- I've always thought (General Chat) - paulg, Oct 15, 13:45:41
- that seems to be a pretty good tactic if you could get half the group together alone (General Chat) - Tombs, Oct 15, 13:36:21
- machiavellian (General Chat) - Tombs, Oct 15, 12:40:44
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.