As you say, Belgian law and court

But applying basic analytical principles ...

The operative part is 5.1: "AZ shall use its Best Reasonable Efforts to manufacture the Initial Europe Doses within the EU for distribution, and to deliver to the Distribution Hubs, following EU marketing authorization" in quantieis and at time which have been redacted.

So the first question is whether AZ has used its Best Reasonable Efforts to do that.

Since Best Reasonable Efforts is defined ENTIRELY by reference to the quality of AZ's "activities and degree of effort ... in the development and manufacture of a Vaccine", they're going to have to show that AZ hasn't made enough effort or hasn't done the right things. It won't be enough for them to say "you could have fulfilled our order by not fulfilling someone else's order". That doesn't show a failure of effort or activity.

Posted By: Old Git on January 29th 2021 at 15:51:59


Message Thread


Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.

Log in