I get that - my baseline position though

is that there really should be no moaning whatsoever because we are top and incredible.

But I know that's not realistic.

Posted By: norway on April 16th 2019 at 16:53:58

Message Thread

Hard to hold ya tongue with some topics. (NCFC) - SexyBennett, Apr 16, 16:24:52
- Let’s be honest it’s mostly nerves I think (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Apr 16, 17:57:19
- Show me any other team in this division where (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 16, 17:09:12
  - Jim. (NCFC) - SexyBennett, Apr 16, 17:57:06
    - I just think it’s unrealistic for them not to expect comments (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 16, 18:08:58
      - Ps. I don’t really see why they would be confused. It’s very simple really (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 16, 18:19:28
        
        "People at the club" should also know that, generally speaking (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 16, 18:23:16
        
        Very simple indeed. (n/m) (NCFC) - SexyBennett, Apr 16, 18:22:56
        
        Pps but I do still think it’s all been blown out of proportion as there is very little (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 16, 18:22:12
        
        You’ve ignored every word of my reply directly to you. (NCFC) - SexyBennett, Apr 16, 18:24:27
        
        Sorry which one? (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 16, 18:39:48
        
        If you mean the post above I’ve not ignored it, I’ve replied to what you said (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 16, 18:48:05
  - Doubt he's taking about this forum There's been moaning at games. Absolutely no need (n/m) (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Apr 16, 17:29:34
    - I think that’s fair (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Apr 16, 17:46:03
  - Why do we have to compare ourselves to them? (n/m) (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Apr 16, 17:10:44
    - What do people expect Norwich fans to be unlike every other set of football fans who (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 16, 17:13:16
      - I don’t think you hear or see some of the stuff that goes on. (NCFC) - APB, Apr 16, 17:25:58
        
        Still no different to any other team though (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 16, 17:30:44
        
        But that’s not really relevant, is it? (NCFC) - APB, Apr 16, 17:34:59
        
        I guess not (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 16, 17:36:38
        
        Absolutely. (NCFC) - APB, Apr 16, 17:40:13
- Poor guy, wait until we get to the Prem. It will be FUCKING MISERABLE (n/m) (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Apr 16, 16:59:09
- Fans should not have opinions. (NCFC) - Men without hats, Apr 16, 16:50:04
  - My feeling is, fans can have opinions but they have to accept that this might (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Apr 16, 17:09:24
    - Right so the club decrees no more opinions from fans. Down with that sort of thing. (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 16, 17:41:01
      - No - but don’t take it to the stands on matchday (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Apr 16, 17:47:10
        
        I don’t. I’ve not heard anyone else doing it either. I thought the support at the last (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 16, 17:50:24
        
        someone said that some moron int eh upper Barclay shouted "fuck off Cantwell you're shit" (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Apr 16, 18:42:16
    - Admittedly I'm not on twitter (NCFC) - Men without hats, Apr 16, 17:39:24
    - Got you (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 16, 17:30:14
    - 👏👏👏👏👏 (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Apr 16, 17:10:35
- could play our strongest team (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Apr 16, 16:39:33
  - So are you guaranteeing that our "strongest team" would (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Apr 16, 16:44:18
  - Which is? If it involves dropping TC then it's a square peg in a round hole (NCFC) - 702, Apr 16, 16:43:50
    - Not really is it. Cantwell is no more a wide player than Vrancic (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 16, 16:52:32
      - TC did lay well earlier in the season wide left. But (NCFC) - canary_wharf, Apr 16, 17:00:12
      - Played well on the left, I'd start him there with Onel on the right against Wednesday (n/m) (NCFC) - 702, Apr 16, 16:54:30
        
        I wouldn’t mind that as long as Leitner or Vrancic are next to Trybull (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 16, 16:59:04
    - don't know (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Apr 16, 16:45:18
- Amen (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Man, Apr 16, 16:38:52
- Could not agree more. (NCFC) - norway, Apr 16, 16:31:32
  - There's barely any fucking grumbling! (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 16, 16:34:26
    - People moaning about people moaning about people moaning about players (NCFC) - Kangol Canary, Apr 16, 16:50:38
      - Stop moaning (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Apr 16, 16:52:23
    - Is that right though? (NCFC) - 702, Apr 16, 16:42:19
      - But what happens more is that someone comments on twitter (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 16, 17:06:17
    - It's just so tiresome and repetitive though. It's being (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Apr 16, 16:40:33
      - Yep. (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Apr 16, 16:44:02
    - An ITK is indicating that there is and that the squad is bemused. (NCFC) - norway, Apr 16, 16:36:07
      - An ITK? Pray tell us who Norway? (NCFC) - Men without hats, Apr 16, 16:43:42
        
        Sexybennett is an ITK. Are you not familiar with this board? (NCFC) - norway, Apr 16, 16:48:11
      - Why do the squad even know about it? Because of f**king (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 16, 16:39:25
        
        Maybe they see it on twitter. (NCFC) - norway, Apr 16, 16:43:22
        
        You really are a stirrer at times! (n/m) (NCFC) - Men without hats, Apr 16, 16:44:54
        
        No matter how much you chase me around, I'm not going to fuck you. Sorry. (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Apr 16, 16:49:21
        
        👀 (n/m) (NCFC) - APB, Apr 16, 17:03:58
        
        Sad to see (NCFC) - norway, Apr 16, 17:08:54
      - Because it's been fanned by those fans moaning (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 16, 16:37:50
        
        Well again, that's your interpretation of the sum total of *all* online selection chat (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Apr 16, 16:40:36
        
        So now a tiny number of utter bellends (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 16, 16:43:38
        
        Again... I'm deferring to the ITK on this. (NCFC) - norway, Apr 16, 16:46:10
        
        Neither am I (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 16, 16:49:13
        
        ... (NCFC) - 702, Apr 16, 16:52:48
        
        Classic example. A so called superior fan copying in Cantwell to a thread where (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 16, 17:12:04
        
        There's an example which backs up my point (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 16, 16:56:02
        
        ie. Connor has highlighted something to him (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 16, 16:57:38
        
        Yep, absolutely. (NCFC) - 702, Apr 16, 17:04:04
        
        I wouldn't play him, but if Farke does then I'll be hoping he has (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 16, 17:08:00
        
        I wouldn't play him, not because he's not good enough, but because I want more experience (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Apr 16, 17:31:16
        
        Completely agree. 100%. Fucking awful tweet tbh. (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Apr 16, 16:56:54
        
        I simply don't know. (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Apr 16, 16:50:06
        
        Amazed you think there might be. But whatever. (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 16, 16:51:02
        
        I get that - my baseline position though (NCFC) - norway, Apr 16, 16:53:58
        
        In general I agree (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 16, 16:58:40
        
        👍 (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Apr 16, 16:59:43
        
        Agreed (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 16, 16:40:01

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.