Is that right though?

For instance, I don't think any NCFC players will be reading this thread.

But if I tweeted any of them saying they were s**t and it was their fault that we didn't beat Reading or Wigan, they're more likely then to read it.

Ergo, the issue is with the 'opinion expressers' rather than the 'moaners'.

Posted By: 702 on April 16th 2019 at 16:42:19

Message Thread

Hard to hold ya tongue with some topics. (NCFC) - SexyBennett, Apr 16, 16:24:52
- Let’s be honest it’s mostly nerves I think (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Apr 16, 17:57:19
- Show me any other team in this division where (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 16, 17:09:12
  - Jim. (NCFC) - SexyBennett, Apr 16, 17:57:06
    - I just think it’s unrealistic for them not to expect comments (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 16, 18:08:58
      - Ps. I don’t really see why they would be confused. It’s very simple really (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 16, 18:19:28
        
        "People at the club" should also know that, generally speaking (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 16, 18:23:16
        
        Very simple indeed. (n/m) (NCFC) - SexyBennett, Apr 16, 18:22:56
        
        Pps but I do still think it’s all been blown out of proportion as there is very little (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 16, 18:22:12
        
        You’ve ignored every word of my reply directly to you. (NCFC) - SexyBennett, Apr 16, 18:24:27
        
        Sorry which one? (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 16, 18:39:48
        
        If you mean the post above I’ve not ignored it, I’ve replied to what you said (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 16, 18:48:05
  - Doubt he's taking about this forum There's been moaning at games. Absolutely no need (n/m) (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Apr 16, 17:29:34
    - I think that’s fair (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Apr 16, 17:46:03
  - Why do we have to compare ourselves to them? (n/m) (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Apr 16, 17:10:44
    - What do people expect Norwich fans to be unlike every other set of football fans who (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 16, 17:13:16
      - I don’t think you hear or see some of the stuff that goes on. (NCFC) - APB, Apr 16, 17:25:58
        
        Still no different to any other team though (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 16, 17:30:44
        
        But that’s not really relevant, is it? (NCFC) - APB, Apr 16, 17:34:59
        
        I guess not (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 16, 17:36:38
        
        Absolutely. (NCFC) - APB, Apr 16, 17:40:13
- Poor guy, wait until we get to the Prem. It will be FUCKING MISERABLE (n/m) (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Apr 16, 16:59:09
- Fans should not have opinions. (NCFC) - Men without hats, Apr 16, 16:50:04
  - My feeling is, fans can have opinions but they have to accept that this might (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Apr 16, 17:09:24
    - Right so the club decrees no more opinions from fans. Down with that sort of thing. (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 16, 17:41:01
      - No - but don’t take it to the stands on matchday (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Apr 16, 17:47:10
        
        I don’t. I’ve not heard anyone else doing it either. I thought the support at the last (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 16, 17:50:24
        
        someone said that some moron int eh upper Barclay shouted "fuck off Cantwell you're shit" (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Apr 16, 18:42:16
    - Admittedly I'm not on twitter (NCFC) - Men without hats, Apr 16, 17:39:24
    - Got you (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 16, 17:30:14
    - 👏👏👏👏👏 (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Apr 16, 17:10:35
- could play our strongest team (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Apr 16, 16:39:33
  - So are you guaranteeing that our "strongest team" would (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Apr 16, 16:44:18
  - Which is? If it involves dropping TC then it's a square peg in a round hole (NCFC) - 702, Apr 16, 16:43:50
    - Not really is it. Cantwell is no more a wide player than Vrancic (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 16, 16:52:32
      - TC did lay well earlier in the season wide left. But (NCFC) - canary_wharf, Apr 16, 17:00:12
      - Played well on the left, I'd start him there with Onel on the right against Wednesday (n/m) (NCFC) - 702, Apr 16, 16:54:30
        
        I wouldn’t mind that as long as Leitner or Vrancic are next to Trybull (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 16, 16:59:04
    - don't know (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Apr 16, 16:45:18
- Amen (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Man, Apr 16, 16:38:52
- Could not agree more. (NCFC) - norway, Apr 16, 16:31:32
  - There's barely any fucking grumbling! (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 16, 16:34:26
    - People moaning about people moaning about people moaning about players (NCFC) - Kangol Canary, Apr 16, 16:50:38
      - Stop moaning (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Apr 16, 16:52:23
    - Is that right though? (NCFC) - 702, Apr 16, 16:42:19
      - But what happens more is that someone comments on twitter (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 16, 17:06:17
    - It's just so tiresome and repetitive though. It's being (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Apr 16, 16:40:33
      - Yep. (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Apr 16, 16:44:02
    - An ITK is indicating that there is and that the squad is bemused. (NCFC) - norway, Apr 16, 16:36:07
      - An ITK? Pray tell us who Norway? (NCFC) - Men without hats, Apr 16, 16:43:42
        
        Sexybennett is an ITK. Are you not familiar with this board? (NCFC) - norway, Apr 16, 16:48:11
      - Why do the squad even know about it? Because of f**king (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 16, 16:39:25
        
        Maybe they see it on twitter. (NCFC) - norway, Apr 16, 16:43:22
        
        You really are a stirrer at times! (n/m) (NCFC) - Men without hats, Apr 16, 16:44:54
        
        No matter how much you chase me around, I'm not going to fuck you. Sorry. (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Apr 16, 16:49:21
        
        👀 (n/m) (NCFC) - APB, Apr 16, 17:03:58
        
        Sad to see (NCFC) - norway, Apr 16, 17:08:54
      - Because it's been fanned by those fans moaning (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 16, 16:37:50
        
        Well again, that's your interpretation of the sum total of *all* online selection chat (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Apr 16, 16:40:36
        
        So now a tiny number of utter bellends (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 16, 16:43:38
        
        Again... I'm deferring to the ITK on this. (NCFC) - norway, Apr 16, 16:46:10
        
        Neither am I (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 16, 16:49:13
        
        ... (NCFC) - 702, Apr 16, 16:52:48
        
        Classic example. A so called superior fan copying in Cantwell to a thread where (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 16, 17:12:04
        
        There's an example which backs up my point (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 16, 16:56:02
        
        ie. Connor has highlighted something to him (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 16, 16:57:38
        
        Yep, absolutely. (NCFC) - 702, Apr 16, 17:04:04
        
        I wouldn't play him, but if Farke does then I'll be hoping he has (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 16, 17:08:00
        
        I wouldn't play him, not because he's not good enough, but because I want more experience (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Apr 16, 17:31:16
        
        Completely agree. 100%. Fucking awful tweet tbh. (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Apr 16, 16:56:54
        
        I simply don't know. (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Apr 16, 16:50:06
        
        Amazed you think there might be. But whatever. (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 16, 16:51:02
        
        I get that - my baseline position though (NCFC) - norway, Apr 16, 16:53:58
        
        In general I agree (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 16, 16:58:40
        
        👍 (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Apr 16, 16:59:43
        
        Agreed (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 16, 16:40:01

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.