everything gets shoved through under section 106

developers and landowners get to shaft people's mental and physical health and wellbeing and dry f**k the environment and make lots of lovely profit via ugly intrusive developments and then, f**k me, that cycle way doesn't get built that old peoples care facility is halved in size etc etc.

still, a f**king big tower block eh.

Posted By: Tombs on December 6th 2018 at 18:07:25

Message Thread

Anglia Square redevelopment plans approved. (General Chat) - Bungle, Dec 6, 16:27:43
- the problem is.... (General Chat) - rosarios_school_tie, Dec 6, 17:33:20
  - It’s true that there is a presumption in favour of sustainable development but (General Chat) - Jim, Dec 6, 18:51:31
  - everything gets shoved through under section 106 (General Chat) - Tombs, Dec 6, 18:07:25
- what a shit scheme that is, obviously backhanders to the councillors to get it passed (n/m) (General Chat) - fareastcanary, Dec 6, 16:37:20
  - 767 objected 120 supported, fucking incredible (n/m) (General Chat) - Tombs, Dec 6, 16:38:51
- that is such a bullshit decision (n/m) (General Chat) - Tombs, Dec 6, 16:35:00
  - still, another Shoe Zone. (n/m) (General Chat) - Higher Wrather, Dec 6, 16:49:06
    - pop up shops in shipping containers under the flyover (General Chat) - Tombs, Dec 6, 16:54:07
      - To be fair, those sort of "box parks" have been very popular down in that there London and (General Chat) - Jim, Dec 6, 17:01:45
        
        Too many words. (n/m) (General Chat) - protheroe fitzgibbon, Dec 6, 18:02:21
        
        with £271M at your disposal I reckon virtually anyone could draw up a better revamp (n/m) (General Chat) - Worzel Scrimmage, Dec 6, 17:27:16

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.