Who supports NCFC because of Delia?

Second time I've read that on here today.

I love the notion that someone might have been weigning up a lifetime of silverware with a Manchester club or a lifetime of failure* with their local club Norwich, and that it was Delia that tipped the balance for them.

(*based on a success criteria of sustained PL football, which of course only a small number of clubs in the current era can lay claim to)

Posted By: CWC on September 3rd 2018 at 20:33:58

Message Thread

It's quite interesting reading the below (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Sep 3, 19:58:25
- Who supports NCFC because of Delia? (NCFC) - CWC, Sep 3, 20:33:58
  - All The Wimmin obviously (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Sep 3, 21:08:58
    - Destiny's child or the pretty one from them? (n/m) (NCFC) - Men without hats, Sep 3, 21:15:27
  - Isn't it more a case that a large percentage of the fan base now (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Sep 3, 20:58:53
    - Para 3, boom (NCFC) - CWC, Sep 3, 21:08:42
      - That's very true. (NCFC) - Men without hats, Sep 3, 21:17:08
        
        Don't not font. (n/m) (NCFC) - Men without hats, Sep 3, 21:17:22
    - Probably true Mec, I come from the older group I spose (NCFC) - Men without hats, Sep 3, 21:08:38
  - I do, I have her back catalogue. (NCFC) - Men without hats, Sep 3, 20:54:00
  - Kevin Bacon? (NCFC) - tim berry, Sep 3, 20:47:26
  - Jamie Oliver? (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Sep 3, 20:35:10
    - Heston Blumminghell (n/m) (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Sep 3, 20:52:25
      - Read that as Bumminghell jumbo! (NCFC) - Men without hats, Sep 3, 21:20:55
    - Gordon Ramsey? (n/m) (NCFC) - Men without hats, Sep 3, 20:51:20
    - Cambridge fan isnt he? (n/m) (NCFC) - CWC, Sep 3, 20:36:55
      - Is he? Would've put him down as Chelsea (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Sep 3, 21:10:36
        
        Not 'hard' enough for wet spsm surely. (NCFC) - Men without hats, Sep 3, 21:19:17
      - It was a rather feeble “celeb chefs sticking together joke” (NCFC) - Old Git, Sep 3, 20:39:56
- I could agree with everything you say (NCFC) - camcan, Sep 3, 20:10:54
  - What is it that is so unpleasant about his posts? I really don’t see it (NCFC) - Jim, Sep 3, 21:32:16
    - He accused me of double standards for no real reason. (NCFC) - APB, Sep 3, 21:41:23
      - I try not to insult anyone. I don’t see the need. I think we all care and (NCFC) - Jim, Sep 3, 21:50:47
        
        I wasn’t referring to you by the way when referring to “others” (NCFC) - Jim, Sep 3, 21:58:39
        
        I don’t mind. (NCFC) - APB, Sep 3, 22:12:00
      - Tbf to Jim I am amazed at his ability (NCFC) - CWC, Sep 3, 21:50:46
        
        Totally agree. (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Sep 3, 22:05:52
  - re-read your own post..... talk about the pot calling kettle black. (NCFC) - usacanary, Sep 3, 20:32:41
    - Good. (NCFC) - camcan, Sep 3, 21:07:22
      - You personally insulted him calling him... (NCFC) - usacanary, Sep 3, 22:26:59
  - Could be wrong but I think he’s a Corbynista (NCFC) - SCC 28, Sep 3, 20:18:08
    - perfect, politics 👌 (NCFC) - Tombs, Sep 3, 20:22:16
      - LOLz (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Sep 3, 20:33:40
      - Ha ha (NCFC) - Old Git, Sep 3, 20:32:12
      - And a Trumper down there ffs ⬇️ (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Sep 3, 20:27:30
        
        There you go Camcan. A perfect illustration of what I (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Sep 3, 20:30:04
        
        SCC was TBF's favourite poster not that long ago (n/m) (NCFC) - camcan, Sep 3, 21:29:40
        
        Jill Stein? (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Sep 3, 20:34:33
    - Not sure you're one to talk about tone i.e. Pants wars. (n/m) (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Sep 3, 20:21:44
      - Well the poster in question might explain it! 🙄 (NCFC) - SCC 28, Sep 3, 20:24:38
  - I don't find him unpleasant in the least. If you want (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Sep 3, 20:17:52
    - ✅ (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Sep 3, 20:28:51
    - Different kind of unpleasant. (NCFC) - avenging canary, Sep 3, 20:23:28
      - yes.... subtle..... instead of..... USAC..... you are a cnut... (NCFC) - usacanary, Sep 3, 20:34:51
        
        Not at a (n/m) (NCFC) - avenging canary, Sep 3, 20:41:53
        
        Not at all. (n/m) (NCFC) - avenging canary, Sep 3, 20:42:16
      - Irony is dead! (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Sep 3, 20:29:09
        
        Irony is double dead. Perhaps the hired help can look it up for you. (n/m) (NCFC) - avenging canary, Sep 3, 20:39:47
        
        Best you have an early night av (NCFC) - Men without hats, Sep 3, 20:46:25
      - Again it's the message that's important. It's just not (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Sep 3, 20:25:52
    - Fair enough (NCFC) - camcan, Sep 3, 20:21:28
      - Oi cammers (NCFC) - Old Git, Sep 3, 20:31:01
        
        Don't really blame you OG, board has been poisoned with politics. (NCFC) - Men without hats, Sep 3, 21:01:54
      - I just wish people in society today would focus more on (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Sep 3, 20:23:08
        
        When the message is delivered in such a way, the messenger is asking for it. (n/m) (NCFC) - avenging canary, Sep 3, 20:24:42
        
        You are joking av, there's a lot worse on here. (NCFC) - Men without hats, Sep 3, 20:57:17
        
        ⬆️ Sanctimonious (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Sep 3, 20:33:24
        
        Nope, but do keep trying (NCFC) - avenging canary, Sep 3, 20:36:47
  - Well said (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Sep 3, 20:11:47
- Kin hell (NCFC) - strap_on sally, Sep 3, 20:10:08
- did you actually just compare yourself with roy keane there? (NCFC) - Tombs, Sep 3, 20:07:51
  - Was exactly what I thought. (NCFC) - avenging canary, Sep 3, 20:20:52
    - ⬆️ condescending (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Sep 3, 20:33:54
      - Nope. (n/m) (NCFC) - avenging canary, Sep 3, 20:34:23
        
        Are you not in ' the clique' OG? (NCFC) - Men without hats, Sep 3, 20:50:18
        
        ⬆️ Racist. For the avoidance of doubt. (n/m) (NCFC) - avenging canary, Sep 3, 21:00:48
        
        Cheers av ! Shouldn't you be in bed - school tomorrow. (n/m) (NCFC) - Men without hats, Sep 3, 21:26:58
        
        ⬆️ absolutely no self awareness (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Sep 3, 20:35:56
- What a c**t (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Sep 3, 20:03:28
  - Not a cunt is he, only scs is qualified to call people that. (n/m) (NCFC) - Men without hats, Sep 3, 20:52:41
  - Classic....slate the messenger rather than the message. (NCFC) - usacanary, Sep 3, 20:37:55
  - *bumptious* cunt (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Sep 3, 20:06:03
    - You can get some cream for that (n/m) (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Sep 3, 20:16:52
      - I think he needs lube...... (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Sep 3, 20:40:41
        
        Chaffers gonna chafe (n/m) (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Sep 3, 21:35:31
      - Ha ha (NCFC) - Old Git, Sep 3, 20:34:40

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.