keep seeing references to an improved performance

But compared to what?

The performances of recent weeks maybe but the recent 5 0 win against the same s**t team no.

It reminded me a lot of the performances at the start of the season where we were winning games but not really playing that well. Some thought we'd kick on and hit top gear but it never happened and now we are reduced to applauding goalless draws.

Expectations really are low and that's exactly what this board wants.

Posted By: Chalk Hill Bitter on January 1st 2017 at 10:56:45

Message Thread

AN has to go but yesterday I thought he got tactics correct however wtf (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Jan 1, 10:04:54
- keep seeing references to an improved performance (NCFC) - Chalk Hill Bitter, Jan 1, 10:56:45
  - The point is we created enough clear chances to win easily (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Jan 1, 11:31:54
- Did he really though? (NCFC) - Jim, Jan 1, 10:17:59
  - I'm far from happy they were proper shite and strangely shit scared of us but if (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Jan 1, 10:21:34
    - Crossed my mind too then I remembered it was Jerome (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Jan 1, 10:56:37
    - True. I did wonder if he was missing on purpose to get rid (NCFC) - Jim, Jan 1, 10:47:30
      - He's not good enough to miss on purpose ffs (n/m) (NCFC) - lurd, Jan 1, 10:57:28
        
        If he tried to miss it would go in (n/m) (NCFC) - colincanary, Jan 1, 10:59:56
        
        Ha! Not a bad idea that. (n/m) (NCFC) - DrDublin, Jan 1, 11:06:52
- The game needed Wes at his best ... (NCFC) - Gob on a Stick, Jan 1, 10:15:30
  - He missed 4/5 decent chances that one off his shin was hilariously embarrassing (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Jan 1, 10:22:56

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.