True. I did wonder if he was missing on purpose to get rid
Of the manager when he stuck that one over.
Murphy's was a very, very good chance as well.
Posted By: Jim on January 1st 2017 at 10:47:30
Message Thread
- AN has to go but yesterday I thought he got tactics correct however wtf (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Jan 1, 10:04:54
- keep seeing references to an improved performance (NCFC) - Chalk Hill Bitter, Jan 1, 10:56:45
- The point is we created enough clear chances to win easily (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Jan 1, 11:31:54
- Did he really though? (NCFC) - Jim, Jan 1, 10:17:59
- I'm far from happy they were proper shite and strangely shit scared of us but if (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Jan 1, 10:21:34
- Crossed my mind too then I remembered it was Jerome (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Jan 1, 10:56:37
- True. I did wonder if he was missing on purpose to get rid (NCFC) - Jim, Jan 1, 10:47:30
- He's not good enough to miss on purpose ffs (n/m) (NCFC) - lurd, Jan 1, 10:57:28
- If he tried to miss it would go in (n/m) (NCFC) - colincanary, Jan 1, 10:59:56
- Ha! Not a bad idea that. (n/m) (NCFC) - DrDublin, Jan 1, 11:06:52
- If he tried to miss it would go in (n/m) (NCFC) - colincanary, Jan 1, 10:59:56
- He's not good enough to miss on purpose ffs (n/m) (NCFC) - lurd, Jan 1, 10:57:28
- I'm far from happy they were proper shite and strangely shit scared of us but if (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Jan 1, 10:21:34
- The game needed Wes at his best ... (NCFC) - Gob on a Stick, Jan 1, 10:15:30
- He missed 4/5 decent chances that one off his shin was hilariously embarrassing (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Jan 1, 10:22:56
- keep seeing references to an improved performance (NCFC) - Chalk Hill Bitter, Jan 1, 10:56:45
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.