AN has to go but yesterday I thought he got tactics correct however wtf

was he thinking not changing Jerome for Naismith/Murphy or even Morris at half time & maybe even Pritchard for Wes? He seems intent on making life difficult.

Posted By: BINMEN8R on January 1st 2017 at 10:04:54

Message Thread

AN has to go but yesterday I thought he got tactics correct however wtf (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Jan 1, 10:04:54
- keep seeing references to an improved performance (NCFC) - Chalk Hill Bitter, Jan 1, 10:56:45
  - The point is we created enough clear chances to win easily (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Jan 1, 11:31:54
- Did he really though? (NCFC) - Jim, Jan 1, 10:17:59
  - I'm far from happy they were proper shite and strangely shit scared of us but if (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Jan 1, 10:21:34
    - Crossed my mind too then I remembered it was Jerome (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Jan 1, 10:56:37
    - True. I did wonder if he was missing on purpose to get rid (NCFC) - Jim, Jan 1, 10:47:30
      - He's not good enough to miss on purpose ffs (n/m) (NCFC) - lurd, Jan 1, 10:57:28
        
        If he tried to miss it would go in (n/m) (NCFC) - colincanary, Jan 1, 10:59:56
        
        Ha! Not a bad idea that. (n/m) (NCFC) - DrDublin, Jan 1, 11:06:52
- The game needed Wes at his best ... (NCFC) - Gob on a Stick, Jan 1, 10:15:30
  - He missed 4/5 decent chances that one off his shin was hilariously embarrassing (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Jan 1, 10:22:56

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.