And full backs that can't defend for toffee
Posted By: BINMEN8R on November 20th 2016 at 09:49:10
Message Thread
- Personally I can't stand 4-4-2 but for a team that insists on (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Nov 20, 09:32:31
- Our formation can't become 4-3-3 (NCFC) - norway, Nov 20, 10:21:07
- *I said Brady in the text but meant Jacob* (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Nov 20, 10:22:08
- We have to win the ball back as we give it away so frequently (NCFC) - Gob on a Stick, Nov 20, 09:40:44
- Yep that too...new manager req'd. (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Nov 20, 09:46:59
- Wasn't yesterday intended to be a bit more of a 4-4-2? (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Nov 20, 09:37:44
- And full backs that can't defend for toffee (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Nov 20, 09:49:10
- To be fair, most of those issues transcend the formation (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Nov 20, 10:09:45
- And full backs that can't defend for toffee (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Nov 20, 09:49:10
- Our formation can't become 4-3-3 (NCFC) - norway, Nov 20, 10:21:07
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.