Nor do I, but horses for courses

and it's basically because Villa are weak going forward so for this game it's a way to get Wes in the team to link up with Naismith again, which he did very well against Liverpool.

We were dynamite going forward in that game, but without Wes and Redmond (even though he drifts out of games) against Spurs we were utterly toothless, with no movement and none of the short interchanges that did for Liverpool.

Got to attack Villa and play our creative players. If not Brady at left back, then leave Brady out and keep Olsson there.

Posted By: duke of york on February 4th 2016 at 13:21:13

Message Thread

team (NCFC) - Nelsons final flanel, Feb 4, 12:42:22
- Good team, only issue that's 5 changes from Saturday. Need stability (n/m) (NCFC) - whoareya1, Feb 4, 16:31:30
- This for me (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Feb 4, 15:20:00
- Time for Ruddy to come back in. (n/m) (NCFC) - Kirrie, Feb 4, 13:13:29
  - Rudd has a tendency to parry the ball straight back our rather than sideways.... (NCFC) - Kirrie, Feb 4, 13:20:54
    - Blimey that's harsh! (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 4, 13:26:59
      - Or tip it over the bar (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Feb 4, 13:30:42
        
        From shin height??!! (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 4, 13:34:16
        
        Yep! Super Hands (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Feb 4, 13:40:54
  - based on what Kirrie? Rudd has not done much wrong that I can see (n/m) (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Feb 4, 13:15:23
  - Behave. (n/m) (NCFC) - MIKEWALKER, Feb 4, 13:15:21
    - DoY agrees with me too! (n/m) (NCFC) - Kirrie, Feb 4, 13:23:17
- Team (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 4, 13:02:19
  - Don't think Olsson deserves to be dropped tbh (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Feb 4, 13:15:54
    - Nor do I, but horses for courses (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 4, 13:21:13
      - Fair point. Agree about trying to get Wes in for his creativity upfront (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Feb 4, 13:25:35
    - He looked full of running on Tuesday. Him and Brady play well together. (n/m) (NCFC) - MIKEWALKER, Feb 4, 13:16:31
      - I never understood him being dropped in the first place (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Feb 4, 13:18:15
  - I like that. (n/m) (NCFC) - Pixelman, Feb 4, 13:12:10
- I would put Naismith on the right Wes in the middle (NCFC) - hoolahan, Feb 4, 13:00:41
- Sticking with Pinto, why spend millions on him if we're going to shit out early doors, so: (NCFC) - MIKEWALKER, Feb 4, 12:58:58
  - Agree about Pinto. He looked shell-shocked. Watching from B-block in the LB, I got a good (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Feb 4, 13:05:01
  - Dorrans? (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 4, 13:00:32
    - held the line admirably with O'Neill against Arsenal (NCFC) - MIKEWALKER, Feb 4, 13:07:53
      - He started the season well (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 4, 13:22:52
    - Man of the match Vs Man city tbf (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Feb 4, 13:02:23
      - He was dogshit in that game (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 4, 13:02:46
        
        The expert on canary call... (NCFC) - loz, Feb 4, 13:11:29
        
        Yep, and everyone else at the game said he was shit (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 4, 13:21:52
        
        many people like coldplay and muse. So what? (n/m) (NCFC) - MIKEWALKER, Feb 4, 13:36:32
- Well.... (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Feb 4, 12:54:05
- Wes has to start (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 4, 12:50:30
  - Or Wisdom (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 4, 12:53:20
- Spot on that, though would like to see Wes at some point (n/m) (NCFC) - phelans tash, Feb 4, 12:47:54
  - Not sure pinto and Redmond right side would offer much protection (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Feb 4, 12:49:54
    - Terrifying prospect (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 4, 12:52:44
      - Whoever played RM recently hasn't provided cover. Starting to think it's a planned tactic! (NCFC) - JD3, Feb 4, 12:58:01

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.