held the line admirably with O'Neill against Arsenal
I like the guy, he's a great footballer and unselfish, whereas Mulumbu appears to be making a comeback from retirement and Tettey is erratic, and suspended in any case. Howson is s**t in centre mid or wide right, but looks better in the Wes role or behind striker, however you want to describe it.
Our 4-4-1-1 has been truly sussed and lacks power in the wes role; he can hardly take a corner let alone score from 20-30 yards; lacks aerial strength and finishing when Jerome plays; and pace when Mbok plays.
Naismith and Bamford are the best solution and will give the opposition LOADS to think about. Pace, pressing excellent finishing, and most importantly improvisation.
Posted By: MIKEWALKER on February 4th 2016 at 13:07:53
Message Thread
- team (NCFC) - Nelsons final flanel, Feb 4, 12:42:22
- Good team, only issue that's 5 changes from Saturday. Need stability (n/m) (NCFC) - whoareya1, Feb 4, 16:31:30
- This for me (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Feb 4, 15:20:00
- Time for Ruddy to come back in. (n/m) (NCFC) - Kirrie, Feb 4, 13:13:29
- Rudd has a tendency to parry the ball straight back our rather than sideways.... (NCFC) - Kirrie, Feb 4, 13:20:54
- Blimey that's harsh! (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 4, 13:26:59
- Or tip it over the bar (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Feb 4, 13:30:42
- From shin height??!! (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 4, 13:34:16
- Yep! Super Hands (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Feb 4, 13:40:54
- From shin height??!! (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 4, 13:34:16
- Or tip it over the bar (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Feb 4, 13:30:42
- Blimey that's harsh! (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 4, 13:26:59
- based on what Kirrie? Rudd has not done much wrong that I can see (n/m) (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Feb 4, 13:15:23
- Behave. (n/m) (NCFC) - MIKEWALKER, Feb 4, 13:15:21
- DoY agrees with me too! (n/m) (NCFC) - Kirrie, Feb 4, 13:23:17
- Rudd has a tendency to parry the ball straight back our rather than sideways.... (NCFC) - Kirrie, Feb 4, 13:20:54
- Team (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 4, 13:02:19
- Don't think Olsson deserves to be dropped tbh (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Feb 4, 13:15:54
- Nor do I, but horses for courses (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 4, 13:21:13
- Fair point. Agree about trying to get Wes in for his creativity upfront (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Feb 4, 13:25:35
- He looked full of running on Tuesday. Him and Brady play well together. (n/m) (NCFC) - MIKEWALKER, Feb 4, 13:16:31
- I never understood him being dropped in the first place (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Feb 4, 13:18:15
- Nor do I, but horses for courses (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 4, 13:21:13
- I like that. (n/m) (NCFC) - Pixelman, Feb 4, 13:12:10
- Don't think Olsson deserves to be dropped tbh (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Feb 4, 13:15:54
- I would put Naismith on the right Wes in the middle (NCFC) - hoolahan, Feb 4, 13:00:41
- Sticking with Pinto, why spend millions on him if we're going to shit out early doors, so: (NCFC) - MIKEWALKER, Feb 4, 12:58:58
- Agree about Pinto. He looked shell-shocked. Watching from B-block in the LB, I got a good (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Feb 4, 13:05:01
- Dorrans? (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 4, 13:00:32
- held the line admirably with O'Neill against Arsenal (NCFC) - MIKEWALKER, Feb 4, 13:07:53
- He started the season well (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 4, 13:22:52
- Man of the match Vs Man city tbf (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Feb 4, 13:02:23
- He was dogshit in that game (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 4, 13:02:46
- The expert on canary call... (NCFC) - loz, Feb 4, 13:11:29
- Yep, and everyone else at the game said he was shit (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 4, 13:21:52
- many people like coldplay and muse. So what? (n/m) (NCFC) - MIKEWALKER, Feb 4, 13:36:32
- Yep, and everyone else at the game said he was shit (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 4, 13:21:52
- The expert on canary call... (NCFC) - loz, Feb 4, 13:11:29
- He was dogshit in that game (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 4, 13:02:46
- held the line admirably with O'Neill against Arsenal (NCFC) - MIKEWALKER, Feb 4, 13:07:53
- Well.... (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Feb 4, 12:54:05
- Wes has to start (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 4, 12:50:30
- Spot on that, though would like to see Wes at some point (n/m) (NCFC) - phelans tash, Feb 4, 12:47:54
- Not sure pinto and Redmond right side would offer much protection (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Feb 4, 12:49:54
- Terrifying prospect (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 4, 12:52:44
- Whoever played RM recently hasn't provided cover. Starting to think it's a planned tactic! (NCFC) - JD3, Feb 4, 12:58:01
- Terrifying prospect (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 4, 12:52:44
- Not sure pinto and Redmond right side would offer much protection (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Feb 4, 12:49:54
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.